Gordon Paul H, Corcia Philippe, Lacomblez Lucette, Pochigaeva Ksenia, Abitbol Jean-Louis, Cudkowicz Merit, Leigh P Nigel, Meininger Vincent
Department of Neurology, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Arch Neurol. 2009 Jun;66(6):758-61. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2009.1.
To examine how respiratory interventions affect survival as an outcome measure and to define survival rate for trials in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
We reviewed the data of 3 phase 3 clinical trials and examined differences in times to death, tracheostomy, and permanent assisted ventilation. We assessed the outcomes with chi(2) and Fisher exact tests for categorical variables and unpaired, 2-tailed t tests for continuous variables. We used Kaplan-Meier methods to estimate the differences in survival times between interventions. A power analysis generated sample size estimates for different end points.
In all, 2077 patients in 2 phase 3 trials of xaliproden and 400 patients in a phase 3 trial of pentoxifylline.
Death or combined death, tracheostomy, or permanent assisted ventilation.
Of 745 deaths, 611 (82.0%) were owing to respiratory failure and 134 (18.0%) to other causes. The use of respiratory interventions across centers ranged from 0% to 6.6% (P = .001) of patients for tracheostomy and 11.1% to 23.1% (P = .05) of patients for noninvasive ventilation. Twelve of 55 patients (21.8%) undergoing tracheostomy had a vital capacity of 50% or more. Mean (SD) survival time was 457.9 (3.1) days using a combined end point and 467.2 (2.9) days with death alone as the outcome (P = .02). An estimated sample size to detect a 10% difference at 18 months between groups was 490 patients per arm for the combined end point and 410 patients for death alone.
Tracheostomy and permanent assisted ventilation are not equivalent to death in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. The use of respiratory interventions differs between centers, leading to variability in combined outcome assessments. The time to the end point can differ significantly depending on its definition, and combining outcomes does not reduce the estimated sample size of a trial. The death rate alone is the least variable and most easily identifiable measure of survival rate in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
以生存作为一项结果指标,研究呼吸干预措施如何影响生存情况,并确定肌萎缩侧索硬化症试验中的生存率。
我们回顾了3项3期临床试验的数据,并研究了死亡时间、气管切开术时间和永久性辅助通气时间的差异。我们采用卡方检验和Fisher精确检验评估分类变量,采用不成对双尾t检验评估连续变量。我们使用Kaplan-Meier方法来估计不同干预措施之间生存时间的差异。通过功效分析得出不同终点的样本量估计值。
共有2项关于利丙双卡因的3期试验中的2077名患者以及1项关于己酮可可碱的3期试验中的400名患者。
死亡或死亡、气管切开术或永久性辅助通气的组合情况。
在745例死亡病例中,6ll例(82.0%)死于呼吸衰竭,134例(18.0%)死于其他原因。各中心气管切开术患者的使用率在0%至6.6%之间(P = 0.001),无创通气患者的使用率在11.1%至23.1%之间(P = 0.05)。接受气管切开术的55例患者中有12例(21.8%)肺活量为50%或更高。采用联合终点时平均(标准差)生存时间为457.9(3.1)天,仅以死亡作为结局时为467.2(2.9)天(P = 0.02)。对于联合终点,估计每组检测18个月时组间10%差异所需的样本量为490例患者;仅以死亡作为结局时为410例患者。
在肌萎缩侧索硬化症中,气管切开术和永久性辅助通气并不等同于死亡。各中心呼吸干预措施的使用情况不同,导致联合结局评估存在差异。根据终点的定义,达到终点的时间可能有显著差异,而且合并结局并不能减少试验的估计样本量。仅死亡率是肌萎缩侧索硬化症中生存率最稳定且最易于识别的指标。