Suppr超能文献

对于接受重建手术的烧伤儿童,鼻内给予右美托咪定进行术前用药与咪达唑仑效果相当。

Intranasal dexmedetomidine premedication is comparable with midazolam in burn children undergoing reconstructive surgery.

作者信息

Talon Mark D, Woodson Lee C, Sherwood Edward R, Aarsland Asle, McRae Laksmi, Benham Tobin

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia, Shriners Hospital for Children, and Department of Anesthesiology, University of Texas Medical Branch-Galveston, Galveston, Texas 77550, USA.

出版信息

J Burn Care Res. 2009 Jul-Aug;30(4):599-605. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e3181abff90.

Abstract

Preoperative anxiety and emergence delirium in children continue to be common even with midazolam premedication. Midazolam is unpleasant tasting even with a flavored vehicle and as a result, patient acceptance is sometimes poor. As an alternative, we evaluated dexmedetomidine administered intranasally. Dexmedetomidine an alpha-2 adrenergic agonist is tasteless, odorless, and painless when administered by this route. Alpha-2 adrenergic agonists produce sedation, facilitate parental separation, and improve conditions for induction of general anesthesia, while preserving airway reflexes. Institutional review board approval was obtained to study 100 pediatric patients randomized to intranasal dexmedetomidine (2 microg/kg) or oral midazolam (0.5 mg/kg) administered 30 to 45 minutes before the surgery. Subjects received general anesthesia with oxygen, nitrous oxide, isoflurane, and analgesics (0.05-0.1 mg/kg morphine or 0.1 mg/kg methadone). Nurses and anesthetists were blinded to the drug administered and evaluated patients for preoperative sedation, conditions for induction of general anesthesia, emergence from anesthesia, and postoperative pain. Responses of 100 patients (50 dexmedetomidine and 50 midazolam) were analyzed. Dexmedetomidine (P=.003) was more effective than midazolam at inducing sleep preoperatively. Dexmedetomidine and midazolam were comparable for conditions at induction (P>0.05), emergence from anesthesia (P>0.05), or postoperative pain (P>0.05). Both drugs were equieffective in these regards. In pediatric patients, dexmedetomidine 2 microg/kg administered intranasally and midazolam 0.5 mg/kg administered orally produced similar conditions during induction and emergence of anesthesia. Intranasal administration of dexmedetomidine is more effective at inducing sleep and in some circumstances offers a useful alternative to oral midazolam in children.

摘要

即使使用咪达唑仑进行术前用药,儿童术前焦虑和苏醒期谵妄仍然很常见。即使使用调味载体,咪达唑仑的味道也不好,因此患者的接受度有时较差。作为替代方案,我们评估了经鼻给予右美托咪定的效果。右美托咪定是一种α-2肾上腺素能激动剂,通过该途径给药时无味、无臭且无痛。α-2肾上腺素能激动剂可产生镇静作用,促进与父母分离,并改善全身麻醉诱导的条件,同时保留气道反射。本研究获得机构审查委员会批准,对100例儿科患者进行研究,这些患者被随机分为术前30至45分钟经鼻给予右美托咪定(2μg/kg)或口服咪达唑仑(0.5mg/kg)。受试者接受氧气、氧化亚氮、异氟烷和镇痛药(0.05 - 0.1mg/kg吗啡或0.1mg/kg美沙酮)进行全身麻醉。护士和麻醉师对所给予的药物不知情,并对患者的术前镇静情况、全身麻醉诱导条件、麻醉苏醒情况和术后疼痛进行评估。分析了100例患者(50例右美托咪定和50例咪达唑仑)的反应。右美托咪定在术前诱导睡眠方面比咪达唑仑更有效(P = 0.003)。右美托咪定和咪达唑仑在诱导条件(P>0.05)、麻醉苏醒(P>0.05)或术后疼痛(P>0.05)方面相当。在这些方面,两种药物效果相当。在儿科患者中,经鼻给予2μg/kg右美托咪定和口服0.5mg/kg咪达唑仑在麻醉诱导和苏醒期间产生相似的情况。经鼻给予右美托咪定在诱导睡眠方面更有效,在某些情况下为儿童口服咪达唑仑提供了一种有用的替代方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验