Suppr超能文献

右美托咪定作为内镜黏膜下剥离术患者辅助镇静剂的系统评价与荟萃分析

Dexmedetomidine as an Adjunctive Sedative in Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Abosheaishaa Hazem, Abdallfatah Abdallfatah, Abdelghany Abdelmalek, Sethi Arshia, Ismail Abdellatif, Mohamed Doha, Aboeldahb Moataz, Abdelhalim Omar, Mohamed Islam, Azzam Ahmed Y, Essibayi Muhammed Amir, Altschul David J, Nassar Mahmoud, Bilal Mohammad

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai / NYC Health + Hospitals, Queens, New York, USA.

Faculty of Medicine, October 6 University, 6 of October City, Giza, Egypt.

出版信息

medRxiv. 2024 Nov 16:2024.11.14.24317324. doi: 10.1101/2024.11.14.24317324.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) allows for curative en-bloc resection of dysplastic gastrointestinal (GI) tract lesions. However, it is associated with postoperative adverse events (AEs) such as pain, bleeding, and perforation. Dexmedetomidine, an α2-receptor agonist, has emerged as a promising adjunct sedative for ESD under moderate sedation, offering anxiolysis and analgesia. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate its efficacy and safety for use in ESD.

METHODS

A comprehensive systematic search was conducted across multiple databases, including Embase, Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science. Studies that involved ESD utilizing dexmedetomidine as an adjunctive medication in combination with other sedatives, were included. Data extraction and risk of bias assessment were independently performed by two reviewers. Meta-analysis was carried out with RevMan using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Eight studies were included in the final analysis. Dexmedetomidine showed no significant difference in en-bloc or complete resection rates compared to controls. Sedation and procedure times were similar between the two groups as well. Dexmedetomidine significantly reduced restlessness (OR 0.15, 95% CI:0.07 to 0.29) and increased bradycardia (OR 7.15, 95% CI 3.17 to 16.11) compared to controls. Upon subgroup analysis, Dexmedetomidine plus Propofol, and Dexmedetomidine plus Midazolam, revealed the same findings regarding restlessness and bradycardia compared to controls which confirmed the adjunctive effects of Dexmedetomidine.

CONCLUSIONS

Dexmedetomidine as an adjunctive sedative appears safe and effective in ESD, reducing restlessness without significant adverse events. The risk of bradycardia is increased, which may be reflective of reduced physiological stress. Future studies should explore optimal dosing and compare Dexmedetomidine with other sedatives in diverse populations.

摘要

引言

内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)可实现对发育异常的胃肠道(GI)病变进行根治性整块切除。然而,它与术后不良事件(AE)相关,如疼痛、出血和穿孔。右美托咪定是一种α2受体激动剂,已成为在中度镇静下用于ESD的一种有前景的辅助镇静剂,具有抗焦虑和镇痛作用。我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估其在ESD中使用的有效性和安全性。

方法

对多个数据库进行了全面的系统检索,包括Embase、Medline、Scopus和Web of Science。纳入了将右美托咪定作为辅助药物与其他镇静剂联合用于ESD的研究。由两名 reviewers 独立进行数据提取和偏倚风险评估。使用RevMan采用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析。

结果

最终分析纳入了八项研究。与对照组相比,右美托咪定在整块切除率或完全切除率方面无显著差异。两组之间的镇静时间和手术时间也相似。与对照组相比,右美托咪定显著降低了躁动(OR 0.15,95% CI:0.07至0.29)并增加了心动过缓(OR 7.15,95% CI 3.17至16.11)。亚组分析显示,与对照组相比,右美托咪定加丙泊酚以及右美托咪定加咪达唑仑在躁动和心动过缓方面显示出相同的结果,这证实了右美托咪定的辅助作用。

结论

右美托咪定作为辅助镇静剂在ESD中似乎是安全有效的,可减少躁动且无明显不良事件。心动过缓的风险增加,这可能反映了生理应激的降低。未来的研究应探索最佳剂量,并在不同人群中将右美托咪定与其他镇静剂进行比较。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcc4/11643290/b4e680f8566c/nihpp-2024.11.14.24317324v2-f0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验