Am J Cardiol. 1991 Nov 15;68(13):1263-73. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(91)90229-e.
To resolve the controversies surrounding the antianginal use of chronic, continuous 24-hour transdermal nitroglycerin therapy, a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, parallel-group study was designed. Eligible patients had chronic angina pectoris with symptom-limited, reproducible treadmill tests and were responsive to sublingual nitroglycerin (n = 562). Patients were randomly assigned to placebo or 1 of 7 doses of active treatment (15, 30, 45, 60, 75, 90 and 105 mg/24 hours). In the active drug groups, treatment was initiated with 15 mg/24 hours during the first week of double-blind dosing with subsequent weekly increases until the assigned dose was reached, after which the dose was held constant. Treadmill tests were performed 0, 4 and 24 hours after the initial double-blind patches were applied, after each titration step and after 8 weeks. At the end of double-blind therapy, a sublingual nitroglycerin exercise challenge was repeated. Exercise tolerance in patients using the active patch increased 34 seconds (p less than 0.05) over patients taking placebo 4 hours after the initial application of double-blind therapy, but there was no statistically significant difference in exercise time between placebo and active drug groups by 24 hours after the first application or for the remaining 8 weeks of the trial. Increasing the dose did not overcome the loss of effect. A partial attenuation of the response to a sublingual nitroglycerin challenge seen on exercise tolerance testing also occurred, with patients who received the highest dose showing the greatest attenuation. There were no differences in angina frequency among the groups, although in a post hoc analysis, patients with greater than 7 attacks per week had a reduction in anginal frequency of 6 to 7 attacks per week with active treatment versus 2 attacks per week with placebo. The study showed that (1) tolerance to the exercise effects of continuous transdermal nitroglycerin develops within 24 hours after application; and (2) increasing the dose does not overcome this tolerance. The observation that symptomatic improvement may occur in the absence of increases in exercise tolerance seems deserving of further study.
为解决围绕慢性、持续24小时经皮硝酸甘油治疗抗心绞痛用途的争议,设计了一项双盲、安慰剂对照、随机、平行组研究。符合条件的患者患有慢性心绞痛,症状受限且可重复进行跑步机测试,对舌下硝酸甘油有反应(n = 562)。患者被随机分配至安慰剂组或7种活性治疗剂量之一(15、30、45、60、75、90和105毫克/24小时)。在活性药物组中,双盲给药的第一周以15毫克/24小时开始治疗,随后每周增加剂量直至达到指定剂量,此后剂量保持恒定。在最初应用双盲贴片后0、4和24小时、每次滴定步骤后以及8周后进行跑步机测试。在双盲治疗结束时,重复舌下硝酸甘油运动激发试验。在最初应用双盲治疗4小时后,使用活性贴片的患者的运动耐量比服用安慰剂的患者增加了34秒(p小于0.05),但在首次应用后24小时或试验的其余8周内,安慰剂组和活性药物组之间的运动时间没有统计学上的显著差异。增加剂量并未克服效果丧失。在运动耐量测试中,对舌下硝酸甘油激发试验的反应也出现了部分减弱,接受最高剂量的患者减弱最为明显。各组之间心绞痛频率没有差异,尽管在事后分析中,每周发作超过7次的患者接受活性治疗后心绞痛频率每周减少6至7次,而接受安慰剂治疗的患者每周减少2次。该研究表明:(1)连续经皮硝酸甘油的运动效应耐受性在应用后24小时内出现;(2)增加剂量并不能克服这种耐受性。在运动耐量没有增加的情况下可能出现症状改善这一观察结果似乎值得进一步研究。