• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[日本版共济失调评估与评分量表(SARA)的可靠性]

[Reliability of the Japanese version of the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA)].

作者信息

Sato Kazunori, Yabe Ichiro, Soma Hiroyuki, Yasui Kenichi, Ito Mizuki, Shimohata Takayoshi, Onodera Osamu, Nakashima Kenji, Sobue Gen, Nishizawa Masatoyo, Sasaki Hidenao

机构信息

Neurology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan.

出版信息

Brain Nerve. 2009 May;61(5):591-5.

PMID:19514520
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS) is widely used as a scale for the assessment of the severity of cerebellar ataxia. However, this scale comprises several items; thus, making the application of this scale is not sufficiently practical to perform daily assessment of ataxic patients. A new rating scale--Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA)--was shown to provide highly reliable assessments; further, the scores on SARA correlated with the ICARS score and the Barthel index. After obtaining the permission, original SARA was translated into Japanese.

OBJECTIVE AND METHODS

To examine the reliability and internal consistency of the Japanese version of the SARA for the assessment of cerebellar ataxia in 66 patients with spinocerebellar degeneration.

RESULTS

Intraclass coefficients (ICC) were observed to be greater than 0.8 except in the case of the inter-rater "finger chase" and "fast alternating hand movement" tests.

CONCLUSIONS

The Japanese version of SARA is highly reliable and very useful for the assessment of cerebellar ataxia on a daily basis.

摘要

背景

国际合作共济失调评定量表(ICARS)被广泛用作评估小脑共济失调严重程度的量表。然而,该量表包含多个项目;因此,应用此量表进行共济失调患者的日常评估不够实用。一种新的评定量表——共济失调评估与评定量表(SARA)——已被证明能提供高度可靠的评估;此外,SARA评分与ICARS评分及巴氏指数相关。经许可后,将原版SARA翻译成了日语。

目的与方法

检验日语版SARA在评估66例脊髓小脑变性患者小脑共济失调方面的信度和内部一致性。

结果

除评定者间“指鼻试验”和“快速轮替动作试验”外,组内相关系数(ICC)均大于0.8。

结论

日语版SARA高度可靠,对小脑共济失调的日常评估非常有用。

相似文献

1
[Reliability of the Japanese version of the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA)].[日本版共济失调评估与评分量表(SARA)的可靠性]
Brain Nerve. 2009 May;61(5):591-5.
2
Usefulness of the Scale for Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA).共济失调评估与评分量表(SARA)的效用
J Neurol Sci. 2008 Mar 15;266(1-2):164-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2007.09.021. Epub 2007 Oct 22.
3
Scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia: development of a new clinical scale.共济失调评估与分级量表:一种新临床量表的制定
Neurology. 2006 Jun 13;66(11):1717-20. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000219042.60538.92.
4
Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Scale for Assessment and Rating of Ataxia.《共济失调评定量表》中文版的信度和效度。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2013;126(11):2045-8.
5
Comparison of three clinical rating scales in Friedreich ataxia (FRDA).三种临床评定量表在弗里德赖希共济失调(FRDA)中的比较。
Mov Disord. 2009 Sep 15;24(12):1779-84. doi: 10.1002/mds.22660.
6
Reliability and validity of the scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia: a study in 64 ataxia patients.共济失调评估与分级量表的信度和效度:一项针对64例共济失调患者的研究
Mov Disord. 2007 Aug 15;22(11):1633-7. doi: 10.1002/mds.21544.
7
Reliability and validity of the International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale: a study in 156 spinocerebellar ataxia patients.国际合作共济失调评定量表的信度和效度:156例脊髓小脑共济失调患者的研究
Mov Disord. 2006 May;21(5):699-704. doi: 10.1002/mds.20781.
8
Reliability and validity of ICARS in focal cerebellar lesions.国际协作共济失调评定量表(ICARS)在局灶性小脑病变中的信度和效度
Mov Disord. 2007 Nov 15;22(15):2162-9. doi: 10.1002/mds.21543.
9
Application of the International Cooperative Ataxia Scale rating in multiple system atrophy.国际合作性共济失调量表评分在多系统萎缩中的应用。
Mov Disord. 2002 Nov;17(6):1248-54. doi: 10.1002/mds.10290.
10
Related factors of ICARS and SARA scores on spinocerebellar ataxia type 3/Machado-Joseph disease.3型脊髓小脑共济失调/马查多-约瑟夫病中ICARS和SARA评分的相关因素
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2011 Jun;36(6):498-503. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7347.2011.06.005.

引用本文的文献

1
L-arginine in patients with spinocerebellar ataxia type 6: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial.6型脊髓小脑共济失调患者使用L-精氨酸:一项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的2期试验。
EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Nov 25;78:102952. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102952. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Cross-Cultural Translation and Validation of the Thai Version of the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA-TH).《共济失调评估与评分量表(泰国版)》(SARA-TH)的跨文化翻译与验证
Ann Rehabil Med. 2024 Oct;48(5):360-368. doi: 10.5535/arm.240061. Epub 2024 Oct 31.
3
Using a mixed-reality headset to elicit and track clinically relevant movement in the clinic.
在临床环境中使用混合现实头显来引发并追踪具有临床相关性的动作。
medRxiv. 2024 Jul 8:2024.07.07.24310049. doi: 10.1101/2024.07.07.24310049.
4
[Scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia (SARA): translation and cultural adaptation to German-speaking areas].[共济失调评估与评分量表(SARA):德语区的翻译与文化调适]
Wien Med Wochenschr. 2024 Apr;174(5-6):111-122. doi: 10.1007/s10354-023-01014-8. Epub 2023 Apr 24.
5
Temporal Dynamics of the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia in Spinocerebellar Ataxias.脊髓小脑共济失调评定量表的时间动态评估。
Mov Disord. 2023 Jan;38(1):35-44. doi: 10.1002/mds.29255. Epub 2022 Oct 23.
6
French Translation and Cross-cultural Adaptation of the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia.《共济失调评估与评定量表》的法译及跨文化调适。
Cerebellum. 2023 Dec;22(6):1118-1122. doi: 10.1007/s12311-022-01484-3. Epub 2022 Oct 8.
7
Effect of rovatirelin in patients with cerebellar ataxia: two randomised double-blind placebo-controlled phase 3 trials.罗替瑞林治疗小脑共济失调患者的疗效:两项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的 3 期临床试验。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2020 Mar;91(3):254-262. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2019-322168. Epub 2020 Jan 14.
8
The Responsiveness of Triaxial Accelerometer Measurement of Gait Ataxia Is Higher than That of the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia in the Early Stages of Spinocerebellar Degeneration.三轴向加速度计测量步态共济失调的反应性高于早期脊髓小脑变性评估和共济失调评分量表。
Cerebellum. 2019 Aug;18(4):721-730. doi: 10.1007/s12311-019-01025-5.
9
Validity and reliability of a pilot scale for assessment of multiple system atrophy symptoms.一种用于评估多系统萎缩症状的初步量表的效度和信度。
Cerebellum Ataxias. 2017 Jul 3;4:11. doi: 10.1186/s40673-017-0067-5. eCollection 2017.
10
A 3-year cohort study of the natural history of spinocerebellar ataxia type 6 in Japan.日本6型脊髓小脑共济失调自然史的3年队列研究。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2014 Jul 23;9:118. doi: 10.1186/s13023-014-0118-4.