Anderson W
History and Sociology of Science Department of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia 19104-6310.
Am J Public Health. 1991 Nov;81(11):1506-17. doi: 10.2105/ajph.81.11.1506.
During the past 5 years, the exchange of sterile needles and syringes for dirty injecting equipment has gained increasing acceptance outside the United States as a potential means of reducing the transmission of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) among intravenous drug users. This article describes the controversy over attempts to establish a needle and syringe exchange scheme in New York City between 1985 and 1991. The response to a health crisis is used as an indicator of patterns of social and institutional practice. Advocates of needle exchanges had reached a stalemate with the promoters of law enforcement, and the strategic reformulation of the policy problem in terms of the research process seemed to offer a solution. The article discusses the practical limitations on designing and carrying out a controversial health promotion policy; the use (under constraint) of a restrictive research process to constitute--rather than simply to guide or monitor--public policy; and the potential ethical hazards of health professionals' seeking a polemical recourse to the clinical trial. The efforts to establish a needle exchange in New York thus illustrate more general problems for AIDS prevention.
在过去五年中,用无菌针头和注射器交换脏的注射器具作为一种减少人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)在静脉注射吸毒者中传播的潜在手段,在美国以外越来越被接受。本文描述了1985年至1991年间在纽约市建立针头和注射器交换计划的尝试中所引发的争议。对健康危机的应对被用作社会和机构实践模式的一个指标。针头交换的倡导者与执法推动者陷入了僵局,而从研究过程的角度对政策问题进行战略重新表述似乎提供了一个解决方案。本文讨论了设计和实施一项有争议的健康促进政策的实际限制;在受限情况下使用限制性研究过程来制定——而不是简单地指导或监督——公共政策;以及健康专业人员寻求将临床试验作为有争议手段的潜在伦理风险。因此,在纽约建立针头交换的努力说明了艾滋病预防方面更普遍的问题。