• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

航空决策中的情境压力:目标诱惑与情境厌恶。

Situational pressures on aviation decision making: goal seduction and situation aversion.

作者信息

Bearman Chris, Paletz Susannah B F, Orasanu Judith

机构信息

University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia.

出版信息

Aviat Space Environ Med. 2009 Jun;80(6):556-60. doi: 10.3357/asem.2363.2009.

DOI:10.3357/asem.2363.2009
PMID:19522367
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The context in which a decision is made can shape the decision process in important ways. Of particular interest here are 'strong' situations, that is, contexts where the situation itself exerts an influence on decision making. Borrowing concepts from field theory and approach/avoidance theory, this paper explores the influence of strong situations on pilot decision making.

METHOD

There were 28 pilots flying in Alaska who were interviewed using a critical incident technique where participants were asked to relate stories about challenging flying situations. A bottom-up qualitative analysis of reported social and psychological pressures revealed a range of types, including strong situations, which are described in this paper.

RESULTS

Strong situations were mentioned in 67% of the interviews and included situations likely to motivate the pilot toward unsafe behavior (goal seduction) and situations likely to motivate the pilot away from safe behavior (situation aversion). Goal seduction situations included rescuing others, meeting a significant other, time-related constraints, financial pressures, and unspecified goal seduction; aversive situations included physical discomfort, not having maintenance or facilities for the airplane, and a lack of basic necessities (e.g., lodging) for the pilot.

DISCUSSION

Goal seduction describes one broad, unspecified influence on pilot decision making, but situation aversion is also an important motivator for some pilots. Goal seduction and situation aversion may well underlie the phenomena of plan continuation errors, the tendency for pilots to continue despite evidence suggesting it is imprudent. This study suggests some specific factors that constrain decision making for pilots in challenging situations.

摘要

引言

做出决策的背景能够以重要方式塑造决策过程。在此特别值得关注的是“强烈”情境,即情境本身对决策产生影响的背景。借鉴场论和趋近/回避理论的概念,本文探讨强烈情境对飞行员决策的影响。

方法

对28名在阿拉斯加飞行的飞行员进行了访谈,采用关键事件技术,要求参与者讲述具有挑战性的飞行情境故事。对所报告的社会和心理压力进行自下而上的定性分析,揭示了一系列类型,包括本文所描述的强烈情境。

结果

67%的访谈中提到了强烈情境,包括可能促使飞行员采取不安全行为的情境(目标诱惑)和可能促使飞行员远离安全行为的情境(情境厌恶)。目标诱惑情境包括营救他人、会见重要他人、与时间相关的限制、经济压力以及未明确的目标诱惑;厌恶情境包括身体不适、飞机缺乏维护或设施,以及飞行员缺乏基本生活必需品(如住宿)。

讨论

目标诱惑描述了对飞行员决策一种广泛的、未明确的影响,但情境厌恶对一些飞行员来说也是一个重要的动机因素。目标诱惑和情境厌恶很可能是计划延续错误现象的潜在原因,即尽管有证据表明继续下去是不明智的,飞行员仍倾向于继续。本研究提出了一些在具有挑战性的情境中限制飞行员决策的具体因素。

相似文献

1
Situational pressures on aviation decision making: goal seduction and situation aversion.航空决策中的情境压力:目标诱惑与情境厌恶。
Aviat Space Environ Med. 2009 Jun;80(6):556-60. doi: 10.3357/asem.2363.2009.
2
Socializing the human factors analysis and classification system: incorporating social psychological phenomena into a human factors error classification system.使人为因素分析和分类系统社会化:将社会心理现象纳入人为因素错误分类系统。
Hum Factors. 2009 Aug;51(4):435-45. doi: 10.1177/0018720809343588.
3
Organizational pressures and mitigating strategies in small commercial aviation: findings from Alaska.小型商业航空中的组织压力与缓解策略:来自阿拉斯加的研究结果
Aviat Space Environ Med. 2009 Dec;80(12):1055-8. doi: 10.3357/asem.2590.2009.
4
A day in the life of a volunteer incident commander: errors, pressures and mitigating strategies.志愿者事故指挥官的一天:失误、压力和缓解策略。
Appl Ergon. 2013 May;44(3):488-95. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2012.10.011. Epub 2012 Dec 27.
5
[The psychological profile of pilots of passenger planes: Analysis of temperamental traits, aggression and risk].[客机飞行员的心理剖析:气质特征、攻击性及风险分析]
Med Pr. 2017 Jul 26;68(5):639-651. doi: 10.13075/mp.5893.00444. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
6
Higher landing accuracy in expert pilots is associated with lower activity in the caudate nucleus.专家飞行员更高的着陆精度与尾状核较低的活动有关。
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 26;9(11):e112607. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112607. eCollection 2014.
7
Situational Pressures that Influence Firefighters' Decision Making about Personal Protective Equipment: A Qualitative Analysis.影响消防员个人防护装备决策的情境压力:一项定性分析。
Am J Health Behav. 2016 Sep;40(5):555-67. doi: 10.5993/AJHB.40.5.2.
8
Flying personal planes: modeling the airport choices of general aviation pilots using stated preference methodology.驾驶私人飞机:运用陈述偏好法对通用航空飞行员的机场选择进行建模。
Hum Factors. 2001 Fall;43(3):392-404. doi: 10.1518/001872001775898232.
9
The effectiveness of airline pilot training for abnormal events.航空公司飞行员异常事件培训的有效性。
Hum Factors. 2013 Jun;55(3):477-85. doi: 10.1177/0018720812466893.
10
Aeronautical decision making: instructor-pilot evaluation of five mnemonic methods.航空决策:教员飞行员对五种记忆方法的评估。
Aviat Space Environ Med. 2005 Dec;76(12):1156-61.

引用本文的文献

1
Decision-Making During High-Risk Events: A Systematic Literature Review.高风险事件中的决策:一项系统文献综述
J Cogn Eng Decis Mak. 2023 Jun;17(2):188-212. doi: 10.1177/15553434221147415. Epub 2023 Jan 17.
2
A Systematic Review of Multilevel Influenced Risk-Taking in Helicopter and Small Airplane Normal Operations.直升机和小型飞机正常作业中的多层次影响冒险行为的系统评价。
Front Public Health. 2022 May 12;10:823276. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.823276. eCollection 2022.
3
Preventing and Investigating Horse-Related Human Injury and Fatality in Work and Non-Work Equestrian Environments: A Consideration of the Workplace Health and Safety Framework.
预防和调查工作和非工作马术环境中与人相关的马伤和死亡:对工作场所健康和安全框架的考虑。
Animals (Basel). 2016 May 6;6(5):33. doi: 10.3390/ani6050033.