van Mook Walther N K A, van Luijk Scheltus J, O'Sullivan Helen, Wass Valerie, Schuwirth Lambert W, van der Vleuten Cees P M
Department of Intensive Care and Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Eur J Intern Med. 2009 Jul;20(4):e90-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2008.11.011. Epub 2008 Dec 21.
Core medical knowledge has been assessed for over fifty years and technical and communication skills for at least twenty. The assessment of professionalism however has failed to achieve recognition within this time frame. The interest in the assessment of professionalism and professional behaviour thus is a fairly recent development. This article will firstly clarify how professional behaviour assessment relates to other assessment methods using the framework proposed by Miller6. Thereafter a brief overview will be provided of the current "tool box" of methods available to assess professionalism. Data on the validity, reliability, feasibility, acceptability and educational utility of these "tools" as derived from published evidence will be reviewed. Subsequently a general overview of the way forward in the assessment of professionalism and professional behaviour will be given.
核心医学知识的评估已开展五十多年，技术和沟通技能的评估至少也有二十年了。然而，对专业素养的评估在此时间框架内尚未得到认可。因此，对专业素养和职业行为评估的关注是相当近期才出现的发展。本文将首先使用Miller6提出的框架阐明专业行为评估与其他评估方法的关系。此后，将简要概述当前可用于评估专业素养的“工具盒”方法。将审查从已发表证据中得出的这些“工具”在有效性、可靠性、可行性、可接受性和教育效用方面的数据。随后，将对专业素养和职业行为评估的未来方向进行总体概述。
