DeKeyser Ganz Freda, Fink Naomi Farkash, Raanan Ofra, Asher Miriam, Bruttin Madeline, Nun Maureen Ben, Benbinishty Julie
Hadassah-Hebrew University School of Nursing, Kiryat Hadassah, P.O. Box 12000, Jerusalem.
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2009;41(2):132-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2009.01264.x.
The purpose of this study was to describe the oral-care practices of ICU nurses, to compare those practices with current evidence-based practice, and to determine if the use of evidence-based practice was associated with personal demographic or professional characteristics.
A national survey of oral-care practices of ICU nurses was conducted using a convenience sample of 218 practicing ICU nurses in 2004-05. The survey instrument included questions about demographic and professional characteristics and a checklist of oral-care practices. Nurses rated their perceived level of priority concerning oral care on a scale from 0 to 100. A score was computed representing the sum of 14 items related to equipment, solutions, assessments, and techniques associated with the current best evidence. This score was then statistically analyzed using ANOVA to determine differences of EBP based on demographic and professional characteristics.
The most commonly used equipment was gauze pads (84%), followed by tongue depressors (55%), and toothbrushes (34%). Chlorhexidine was the most common solution used (75%). Less than half (44%) reported brushing their patients' teeth. The majority performed an oral assessment before beginning oral care (71%); however, none could describe what assessment tool was used. Only 57% of nurses reported documenting their oral care. Nurses rated oral care of intubated patients with a priority of 67+/-27.1. Wide variations were noted within and between units in terms of which techniques, equipment, and solutions were used. No significant relationships were found between the use of an evidence-based protocol and demographic and professional characteristics or with the priority given to oral care.
While nurses ranked oral care a high priority, many did not implement the latest evidence into their current practice. The level of research utilization was not related to personal or professional characteristics. Therefore attempts should be made to encourage all ICU nurses to introduce and use evidence-based, oral-care protocols.
Practicing ICU nurses in this survey were often not adhering to the latest evidence-based practice and therefore need to be educated and encouraged to do so in order to improve patient care.
本研究旨在描述重症监护病房(ICU)护士的口腔护理实践,将这些实践与当前的循证实践进行比较,并确定循证实践的应用是否与个人人口统计学特征或专业特征相关。
2004 - 2005年,采用便利抽样法对218名在职ICU护士进行了全国性的ICU护士口腔护理实践调查。调查工具包括有关人口统计学和专业特征的问题以及一份口腔护理实践清单。护士们根据0至100的评分标准对他们认为的口腔护理优先程度进行评分。计算出一个分数,该分数代表与当前最佳证据相关的设备、溶液、评估和技术的14个项目的总和。然后使用方差分析对该分数进行统计分析,以确定基于人口统计学和专业特征的循证实践差异。
最常用的设备是纱布垫(84%),其次是压舌板(55%)和牙刷(34%)。洗必泰是最常用的溶液(75%)。不到一半(44%)的护士报告为患者刷牙。大多数护士在开始口腔护理前进行口腔评估(71%);然而,没有人能描述使用了什么评估工具。只有57%的护士报告记录了他们的口腔护理。护士对插管患者口腔护理的优先评分为67±27.1。在使用哪些技术、设备和溶液方面,各科室内部和科室之间存在很大差异。在循证方案的应用与人口统计学和专业特征或口腔护理的优先程度之间未发现显著关系。
虽然护士将口腔护理列为高度优先事项,但许多人并未将最新证据应用于当前实践。研究应用水平与个人或专业特征无关。因此,应努力鼓励所有ICU护士引入并使用循证口腔护理方案。
本次调查中的在职ICU护士往往未遵循最新的循证实践,因此需要接受教育并受到鼓励,以改善患者护理。