Suppr超能文献

全科医疗与儿童健康诊所免疫接种率的比较。

Comparison of immunisation rates in general practice and child health clinics.

作者信息

Li J, Taylor B

机构信息

Department of Community Child Health, Royal Free Hospital School of Medicine, London.

出版信息

BMJ. 1991 Oct 26;303(6809):1035-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.303.6809.1035.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare immunisation uptake rates in general practice surgeries and community child health clinics.

DESIGN

Cohort study using data from a computerised child health system.

SETTING

Four health districts of North East Thames Regional Health Authority.

SUBJECTS

3616 children born January to March 1990 and resident in the four districts at the end of January 1991.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Immunisation uptake rates at 10-12 months of age, age at immunisation, scheduling performance at the two locations, and odds ratios of outstanding immunisations.

RESULTS

80% of children registered at general practices had completed their third dose of pertussis immunisation compared with 68% of those at health clinics. Median ages at the third dose were 24 weeks and 29 weeks at the two locations respectively. Scheduling was more effective at general practice surgeries. Unscheduled immunisations were more likely to be given after the recommended age. Overall, children resident in rural and suburban areas had greater uptakes than those in inner cities. Odds ratios for not being fully immunised among children registered at health clinics were 1.4 times those among children immunised in general practice and 3.0 times greater among children resident in inner cities than among those in rural and suburban districts. Children who moved into a district, however, were no less likely to be fully immunised than children who were born there.

CONCLUSIONS

The immunisation uptake rate was better in general practices than in child health clinics in both inner city and rural and suburban areas. Uptake may be increased with additional support to enable general practitioners to undertake immunisations, especially in inner cities.

摘要

目的

比较全科医疗诊所和社区儿童健康诊所的免疫接种率。

设计

采用来自计算机化儿童健康系统的数据进行队列研究。

地点

东北泰晤士河地区卫生局的四个健康区。

研究对象

1990年1月至3月出生、1991年1月底居住在这四个区的3616名儿童。

主要观察指标

10至12月龄时的免疫接种率、免疫接种年龄、两个地点的接种安排表现以及未完成免疫接种的比值比。

结果

在全科医疗诊所登记的儿童中,80%完成了第三剂百日咳免疫接种,而在健康诊所登记的儿童中这一比例为68%。两个地点第三剂接种的中位年龄分别为24周和29周。全科医疗诊所的接种安排更有效。非计划内免疫接种更有可能在推荐年龄之后进行。总体而言,农村和郊区的儿童接种率高于市中心的儿童。在健康诊所登记的儿童未完全免疫的比值比是在全科医疗诊所接种儿童的1.4倍,市中心儿童未完全免疫的比值比是农村和郊区儿童的3.0倍。然而,迁入某一区的儿童与在该区出生的儿童完全免疫的可能性并无差异。

结论

在市中心以及农村和郊区,全科医疗诊所的免疫接种率均高于儿童健康诊所。若能提供更多支持以使全科医生能够开展免疫接种工作,尤其是在市中心,接种率可能会提高。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

5
Reform of well-baby services.婴儿健康服务改革。
Can Fam Physician. 1997 Jul;43:1195-6, 1199-200.
7
What is interface audit?什么是接口审计?
J R Soc Med. 1994 Apr;87(4):228-31.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验