• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

入院幼儿的免疫状况及基于病房的机会性免疫策略的有效性。

Immunisation state of young children admitted to hospital and effectiveness of a ward based opportunistic immunisation policy.

作者信息

Riley D J, Mughal M Z, Roland J

机构信息

Department of Paediatrics, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester.

出版信息

BMJ. 1991 Jan 5;302(6767):31-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.302.6767.31.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.302.6767.31
PMID:1991185
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1668766/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To study the need for and effectiveness of a ward based opportunistic immunisation policy.

DESIGN

A six month prospective study.

SETTING

An acute medical paediatric ward of an inner city teaching hospital.

SUBJECTS

296 children admitted to the ward who lived within Central Manchester Health Authority boundaries and were aged from 5 months to 6 years.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Completion of immunisation schedule appropriate for age.

RESULTS

56 children were three or more months behind with immunisations. The parent's history was not reliable for 18 children. Accessing health authority immunisation records was not difficult. The main reasons for falling behind were the mobility of the families (15 children), lack of motivation (14), and frequent minor illnesses (9). 40 children were immunised before discharge, but three could not be because of valid contraindications. Of the 16 children requiring more immunisations after discharge, only four obtained them at the correct time and five children not at all.

CONCLUSION

An opportunistic immunisation policy is an important means of immunising a vulnerable group of children who would often default on routine immunisations, and such policies should operate whenever possible. Our ward based policy can achieve immunisation of three quarters of possible children without change or inconvenience to the daily ward work, but efficacy relies on adequate levels of enthusiastic staff. The system can be improved by having accurate and updated immunisation records available in the hospital, and by encouraging nursing staff to participate.

摘要

目的

研究基于病房的机会性免疫政策的必要性及有效性。

设计

为期六个月的前瞻性研究。

地点

市中心一家教学医院的儿科急症病房。

研究对象

296名入住该病房的儿童,他们居住在曼彻斯特中央卫生局辖区内,年龄在5个月至6岁之间。

主要观察指标

完成适合年龄的免疫接种计划。

结果

56名儿童的免疫接种落后三个月或更长时间。18名儿童的家长提供的病史不可靠。获取卫生局的免疫记录并不困难。免疫接种落后的主要原因是家庭流动性大(15名儿童)、缺乏积极性(14名)以及频繁患小病(9名)。40名儿童在出院前接受了免疫接种,但有3名因有有效的禁忌证而未能接种。在出院后需要更多免疫接种的16名儿童中,只有4名在正确时间接种,5名儿童根本未接种。

结论

机会性免疫政策是为一组易漏种常规疫苗的弱势儿童进行免疫接种的重要手段,此类政策应尽可能实施。我们基于病房的政策可以在不改变日常病房工作或造成不便的情况下,为四分之三可能接种的儿童实现免疫接种,但效果依赖于有足够热情的工作人员。通过在医院提供准确和最新的免疫记录,并鼓励护理人员参与,可以改进该系统。

相似文献

1
Immunisation state of young children admitted to hospital and effectiveness of a ward based opportunistic immunisation policy.入院幼儿的免疫状况及基于病房的机会性免疫策略的有效性。
BMJ. 1991 Jan 5;302(6767):31-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.302.6767.31.
2
Comparison of immunisation rates in general practice and child health clinics.全科医疗与儿童健康诊所免疫接种率的比较。
BMJ. 1991 Oct 26;303(6809):1035-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.303.6809.1035.
3
Opportunistic immunisation in hospital.医院中的机会性免疫接种。
Arch Dis Child. 1999 Nov;81(5):422-5. doi: 10.1136/adc.81.5.422.
4
Immunisation state and its documentation in hospital patients.住院患者的免疫状态及其记录
Arch Dis Child. 1990 Jul;65(7):763-7. doi: 10.1136/adc.65.7.763.
5
Opportunistic immunisation of paediatric inpatients at Rotorua Hospital: audit and discussion.罗托鲁瓦医院儿科住院患者的机会性免疫接种:审计与讨论
N Z Med J. 2009 Jul 3;122(1298):25-30.
6
Immunisation uptake, services required and government incentives for users of formal day care.正规日托服务使用者的免疫接种情况、所需服务及政府激励措施。
Aust N Z J Public Health. 1999 Aug;23(4):368-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-842x.1999.tb01277.x.
7
Immunisation practice in an inner city clinic.市中心诊所的免疫接种实践。
Health Trends. 1989 Feb;21(1):20.
8
Study of immunisation status of rural children (12-23 months age) of district Jaipur, Rajasthan and factors influencing it: a hospital based study.拉贾斯坦邦斋浦尔地区农村儿童(12 - 23个月龄)免疫状况及其影响因素的研究:一项基于医院的研究
J Indian Med Assoc. 2012 Nov;110(11):795-9.
9
Opportunistic immunisation of infants admitted to hospital: are we doing enough?住院婴儿的机会性免疫接种:我们做得够吗?
J Paediatr Child Health. 2008 Jun;44(6):317-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2007.01268.x.
10
Does providing social services with information and advice on immunisation status of "looked after children" improve uptake?为社会服务机构提供有关“受照料儿童”免疫状况的信息和建议,是否能提高疫苗接种率?
Arch Dis Child. 2003 Apr;88(4):299-301. doi: 10.1136/adc.88.4.299.

引用本文的文献

1
Interventions delivered in secondary or tertiary medical care settings to improve routine vaccination uptake in children and young people: a scoping review.二级或三级医疗保健环境中改善儿童和青少年常规疫苗接种率的干预措施:范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 2;12(8):e061749. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061749.
2
Vaccine-preventable disease susceptibility in a British paediatric assessment unit.英国一家儿科评估单位中疫苗可预防疾病的易感性
J Infect Prev. 2014 Nov;15(6):230-233. doi: 10.1177/1757177414548607. Epub 2014 Sep 22.
3
Exploring provider and parental perceptions to influenza vaccination in the inpatient setting.探讨住院环境中医疗服务提供者和家长对流感疫苗接种的看法。
Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2018 May;12(3):416-420. doi: 10.1111/irv.12482. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
4
Using routinely collected data to improve immunisation histories.利用常规收集的数据改善免疫接种史。
BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2013 Dec 5;2(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjquality.u203292.w1492. eCollection 2014.
5
Missed opportunities to vaccinate children admitted to a paediatric tertiary hospital.为入住儿科三级医院的儿童接种疫苗的机会错失情况。
Arch Dis Child. 2007 Jul;92(7):620-2. doi: 10.1136/adc.2006.104778. Epub 2007 Jan 9.
6
Opportunistic immunisation in hospital.医院中的机会性免疫接种。
Arch Dis Child. 1999 Nov;81(5):422-5. doi: 10.1136/adc.81.5.422.
7
Studies of missed opportunities for immunization in developing and industrialized countries.发展中国家和工业化国家免疫接种错失机会的研究。
Bull World Health Organ. 1993;71(5):549-60.
8
Comparison of immunisation rates in general practice and child health clinics.全科医疗与儿童健康诊所免疫接种率的比较。
BMJ. 1991 Oct 26;303(6809):1035-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.303.6809.1035.
9
Effectiveness of ward based opportunistic immunisation policy.基于病房的机会性免疫政策的有效性。
BMJ. 1991 Feb 16;302(6773):412. doi: 10.1136/bmj.302.6773.412-b.

本文引用的文献

1
Immunisation targets in Europe and Britain.欧洲和英国的免疫接种目标。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985 Nov 16;291(6506):1370-1. doi: 10.1136/bmj.291.6506.1370.
2
Immunization status of hospitalized preschool-age children. The need for hospital-based immunization programs.
Am J Dis Child. 1988 Jul;142(7):719-20. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1988.02150070033019.
3
Incomplete immunizations, hospitalization, and specialty care. An opportunity to improve the immunization status of very young children.免疫接种不完整、住院治疗和专科护理。改善幼儿免疫接种状况的一个契机。
Am J Dis Child. 1988 Jul;142(7):704. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1988.02150070018013.
4
Uptake of immunisation in district health authorities in England.英格兰地区卫生当局的免疫接种情况。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1988 Jun 25;296(6639):1775-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.296.6639.1775.
5
Immunising children in hospital.为住院儿童接种疫苗。
BMJ. 1988 Sep 24;297(6651):755.
6
Immunisation: causes of failure and strategies and tactics for success.免疫接种:失败原因及成功的策略与方法
BMJ. 1989 Sep 30;299(6703):808-12. doi: 10.1136/bmj.299.6703.808.
7
Immunisation state and its documentation in hospital patients.住院患者的免疫状态及其记录
Arch Dis Child. 1990 Jul;65(7):763-7. doi: 10.1136/adc.65.7.763.