Meyers J D, Dienstag J L, Purcell R H, Thomas E D, Holmes K K
Ann Intern Med. 1977 Jul;87(1):57-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-87-1-57.
In 1972 a nonsocomial outbreak of parenterally transmitted hepatitis affected both marrow transplant patients and normal platelet donors in an oncology unit. Because of the characteristics of the clinical illness, the incubation period of 27 days, and the effect of immune serum globulin on the clinical illness, the outbreak was attributed to hepatitis A; there was no serologic evidence of either hepatitis B virus or cytomegalovirus infection. Stored serums from this outbreak were re-examined by more recently developed serologic techniques for evidence of hepatitis A (HA) virus infection. Ten patients and donors had undetectable anti-HA titers before illness and none seroconverted; five persons had pre-existent anti-HA titers and showed no further rise in convalescent serums. The serum of one patient was inevaluable. With the availability of serologic techniques for the diagnosis of both hepatitis A and hepatitis B virus infections, it is clear that most cases of post-transfusion hepatitis are not due to either of these agents, and short-incubation-period hepatitis can not be assumed to be hepatitis A without further investigation.
1972年,某肿瘤病房发生了一起经肠道外传播的肝炎医院内感染暴发,累及骨髓移植患者和正常血小板捐献者。鉴于临床疾病的特点、27天的潜伏期以及免疫血清球蛋白对临床疾病的影响,此次暴发被归因于甲型肝炎;没有乙型肝炎病毒或巨细胞病毒感染的血清学证据。采用最近开发的血清学技术,对此次暴发中储存的血清重新进行检测,以寻找甲型肝炎(HA)病毒感染的证据。10名患者和捐献者在发病前抗HA滴度检测不到,且无一例发生血清转化;5人之前就有抗HA滴度,恢复期血清中未显示进一步升高。1例患者的血清无法评估。随着诊断甲型肝炎和乙型肝炎病毒感染血清学技术的出现,很明显,大多数输血后肝炎病例并非由这两种病原体引起,在没有进一步调查的情况下,不能将短潜伏期肝炎假定为甲型肝炎。