Katsamba P, Carroll K, Ahlsen G, Bahna F, Vendome J, Posy S, Rajebhosale M, Price S, Jessell T M, Ben-Shaul A, Shapiro L, Honig Barry H
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, and Edward S Harkness Eye Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Jul 14;106(28):11594-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0905349106. Epub 2009 Jun 24.
Many cell-cell adhesive events are mediated by the dimerization of cadherin proteins presented on apposing cell surfaces. Cadherin-mediated processes play a central role in the sorting of cells into separate tissues in vivo, but in vitro assays aimed at mimicking this behavior have yielded inconclusive results. In some cases, cells that express different cadherins exhibit homotypic cell sorting, forming separate cell aggregates, whereas in other cases, intermixed aggregates are formed. A third pattern is observed for mixtures of cells expressing either N- or E-cadherin, which form distinct homotypic aggregates that adhere to one another through a heterotypic interface. The molecular basis of cadherin-mediated cell patterning phenomena is poorly understood, in part because the relationship between cellular adhesive specificity and intermolecular binding free energies has not been established. To clarify this issue, we have measured the dimerization affinities of N-cadherin and E-cadherin. These proteins are similar in sequence and structure, yet are able to mediate homotypic cell patterning behavior in a variety of tissues. N-cadherin is found to form homodimers with higher affinity than does E-cadherin and, unexpectedly, the N/E-cadherin heterophilic binding affinity is intermediate in strength between the 2 homophilic affinities. We can account for observed cell aggregation behaviors by using a theoretical framework that establishes a connection between molecular affinities and cell-cell adhesive specificity. Our results illustrate how graded differences between different homophilic and heterophilic cadherin dimerizaton affinities can result in homotypic cell patterning and, more generally, show how proteins that are closely related can, nevertheless, be responsible for highly specific cellular adhesive behavior.
许多细胞间的黏附事件是由相对细胞表面上呈现的钙黏蛋白二聚化介导的。钙黏蛋白介导的过程在体内细胞分选到不同组织中起着核心作用,但旨在模拟这种行为的体外试验结果并不确定。在某些情况下,表达不同钙黏蛋白的细胞表现出同型细胞分选,形成单独的细胞聚集体,而在其他情况下,则形成混合聚集体。对于表达N-钙黏蛋白或E-钙黏蛋白的细胞混合物,观察到第三种模式,即形成通过异型界面相互黏附的不同同型聚集体。钙黏蛋白介导的细胞模式形成现象的分子基础了解甚少,部分原因是细胞黏附特异性与分子间结合自由能之间的关系尚未确立。为了阐明这个问题,我们测量了N-钙黏蛋白和E-钙黏蛋白的二聚化亲和力。这些蛋白质在序列和结构上相似,但能够在多种组织中介导同型细胞模式形成行为。发现N-钙黏蛋白形成同二聚体的亲和力高于E-钙黏蛋白,而且出乎意料的是,N/E-钙黏蛋白异型结合亲和力的强度介于两种同型亲和力之间。我们可以通过使用一个理论框架来解释观察到的细胞聚集行为,该框架建立了分子亲和力与细胞间黏附特异性之间的联系。我们的结果说明了不同同型和异型钙黏蛋白二聚化亲和力之间的分级差异如何导致同型细胞模式形成,更普遍地说,展示了密切相关的蛋白质如何仍然能够导致高度特异性的细胞黏附行为。