Suppr超能文献

机器人辅助扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫术治疗淋巴结转移风险增加的膀胱癌。

Robotic extended pelvic lymphadenectomy for bladder cancer with increased nodal yield.

机构信息

The Ohio State University Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital, Department of Urology, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.

出版信息

BJU Int. 2011 Jun;107(11):1802-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09789.x. Epub 2010 Nov 11.

Abstract

STUDY TYPE

Therapy (case series).

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

  1. What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? The standard of care for invasive bladder cancer is open radical cystectomy with the extent of pelvic lymph node dissection impacting oncological outcomes. Scepticism remains regarding whether an adequate node dissection can be performed in minimally-invasive fashion as previously reported nodal yields of laparoscopic or robotic lymphadenectomy are well below those reported with open surgery. This study demonstrates that extended pelvic lymphadenectomy can be performed robotically with equivalent nodal yields to open series from centres of excellence.

OBJECTIVE

To report our initial experience with robot-assisted extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) using a standardized open template.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In total, 15 consecutive patients underwent robotic radical cystectomy at a single center by a single surgeon using a standard dissection template. Operating time, time to perform ePLND, pathological stage, estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, number of nodes obtained and nodal positivity were assessed. Postoperative complications and re-admissions were reviewed.

RESULTS

The mean (range) age and body mass index was 66 (46-87) years and 29 (22-43) kg/m2, respectively. The mean (range) operating time and ePLND time was 423 (300-506) min and 107 (66-160) min. Mean (range) estimated blood loss was 160 (50-500) mL. The mean (range) and median length of hospital stay were 3.4 (3-7) days and 3 days, respectively. The mean (range) nodal yield was 41.8 (18-67) nodes, with greater than 25 nodes in 13 patients. Three patients were found to have nodal positivity. Of the fifteen patients, four received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Two patients were re-admitted for postoperative complications within 30 days. There were no complications directly resulting from the ePLND.

CONCLUSIONS

Robot-assisted ePLND at the time of cystectomy can be safely and effectively performed on the robotic platform with comparable nodal yields to open series at centers of excellence for cystectomy. Nodal yields are likely to comprise a factor related to the effort of the surgeon, and not the method by which the lymphadenectomy is performed.

摘要

研究类型

治疗(病例系列)。

证据水平

  1. 目前已知的内容是什么?本研究有何新发现?浸润性膀胱癌的标准治疗方法是开放性根治性膀胱切除术,盆腔淋巴结清扫的范围影响肿瘤学结果。对于微创手术是否可以进行充分的淋巴结清扫,仍存在怀疑,因为腹腔镜或机器人淋巴结切除术的淋巴结检出率远低于开放手术的报道。本研究表明,在卓越中心,机器人辅助广泛盆腔淋巴结清扫术(ePLND)可以与开放系列手术获得等效的淋巴结检出率。

目的

报告我们使用标准化开放模板进行机器人辅助广泛盆腔淋巴结清扫术(ePLND)的初步经验。

患者和方法

在单中心由同一位外科医生对 15 例连续患者进行了机器人根治性膀胱切除术,使用标准的解剖模板。评估手术时间、ePLND 时间、病理分期、估计失血量、住院时间、获得的淋巴结数量和淋巴结阳性率。回顾术后并发症和再入院情况。

结果

平均(范围)年龄和体重指数分别为 66(46-87)岁和 29(22-43)kg/m2。平均(范围)手术时间和 ePLND 时间分别为 423(300-506)min 和 107(66-160)min。平均(范围)估计失血量为 160(50-500)mL。平均(范围)和中位数住院时间分别为 3.4(3-7)天和 3 天。平均(范围)淋巴结检出量为 41.8(18-67)个,其中 13 例患者检出的淋巴结数量大于 25 个。3 例患者发现淋巴结阳性。在 15 例患者中,有 4 例接受了新辅助化疗。2 例患者在 30 天内因术后并发症再次入院。ePLND 无直接并发症。

结论

在卓越的膀胱癌治疗中心,在机器人平台上进行机器人辅助 ePLND 可以安全有效地进行,并且与开放系列手术的淋巴结检出率相当。淋巴结检出率可能与外科医生的努力有关,而不是与淋巴结清扫的方法有关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验