Tschoppe P, Kielbassa A M, Toll R, Meyer-Lückel H
CharitéCentrum für Zahn-, Mund- und Kieferheilkunde, Abteilung für Zahnerhaltungskunde und Parodontologie, Berlin.
Laryngorhinootologie. 2009 Nov;88(11):717-22. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1224107. Epub 2009 Jun 24.
This in vitro study investigated the effects of exposure to modified (with respect to calcium phosphate saturation) solutions of a commercial available saliva substitute (Saliva natura) on mineralization of enamel in vitro.
Bovine enamel specimens were prepared. Before and after demineralization (pH 4.95, 14 d, 37 degrees C), one-quarter of each specimen's surface was covered with nail varnish (control of sound/demineralized tissue). Specimens were exposed either to original Saliva natura [saturation with respect to octacalciumphosphate (S (OCP)): 0.03, pH 5.8] or to three lab-produced Saliva natura modifications (S (OCP): 1, 2, 3, pH 6.0) for two and five weeks (37 degrees C). An aqueous solution (S (OCP): 2.7, pH 7.0; Buskes remineralizing solution) served as positive control. Differences in mineral losses (DeltaDeltaZ) and lesion depths (DeltaLD) before and after storage were evaluated from microradiographs.
After two weeks storage no differences among the solutions with regard to DeltaDeltaZ and DeltaDeltaLD could be observed (p>0.05; ANOVA). Five weeks storage in original Saliva natura resulted in significantly lower DeltaDeltaZ values compared to all other solutions (p<0.05). No differences with respect to DeltaDeltaZ among the modified solutions (S (OCP) 1, 2, 3; p>0.05) could be observed, whereas storage in the remineralizing solution resulted in higher DeltaDeltaZ values compared to all other solutions (p<0.05). For DeltaLD similar results could be revealed. However, no differences between the remineralizing solution and Saliva natura S (OCP) 2 could be shown (p>0.05).
Saliva natura with an S (OCP) of 2 showed the highest remineralizing capacities. More pronounced remineralization could not be achieved with a higher S (OCP) of 3 under the conditions chosen.
本体外研究调查了将市售唾液替代品(Saliva natura)的改良溶液(相对于磷酸钙饱和度)体外暴露于牙釉质矿化的影响。
制备牛牙釉质标本。在脱矿质(pH 4.95,14天,37摄氏度)前后,每个标本表面的四分之一用指甲油覆盖(健全/脱矿质组织的对照)。将标本暴露于原始的Saliva natura [相对于八钙磷酸盐的饱和度(S(OCP)):0.03,pH 5.8]或三种实验室制备的Saliva natura改良剂(S(OCP):1、2、3,pH 6.0)中两周和五周(37摄氏度)。水溶液(S(OCP):2.7,pH 7.0;Buskes再矿化溶液)用作阳性对照。从显微放射照片评估储存前后矿物质损失(ΔΔZ)和病变深度(ΔLD)的差异。
储存两周后,在ΔΔZ和ΔΔLD方面,各溶液之间未观察到差异(p>0.05;方差分析)。与所有其他溶液相比,在原始Saliva natura中储存五周导致ΔΔZ值显著降低(p<0.05)。在改良溶液(S(OCP)1、2、3)之间未观察到ΔΔZ方面的差异(p>0.05),而与所有其他溶液相比,在再矿化溶液中储存导致更高的ΔΔZ值(p<0.05)。对于ΔLD,可以得出类似的结果。然而,再矿化溶液和Saliva natura S(OCP)2之间未显示出差异(p>0.05)。
S(OCP)为2的Saliva natura显示出最高的再矿化能力。在所选择的条件下,较高的S(OCP)为3并不能实现更明显的再矿化。