Stice Paula, Muthuswamy Jit
Department of Bioengineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-9709, USA.
J Neural Eng. 2009 Aug;6(4):046004. doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/6/4/046004. Epub 2009 Jun 25.
Repositioning microelectrodes post-implantation is emerging as a promising approach to achieve long-term reliability in single neuronal recordings. The main goal of this study was to (a) assess glial reaction in response to movement of microelectrodes in the brain post-implantation and (b) determine an optimal window of time post-implantation when movement of microelectrodes within the brain would result in minimal glial reaction. Eleven Sprague-Dawley rats were implanted with two microelectrodes each that could be moved in vivo post-implantation. Three cohorts were investigated: (1) microelectrode moved at day 2 (n = 4 animals), (2) microelectrode moved at day 14 (n = 5 animals) and (3) microelectrode moved at day 28 (n = 2 animals). Histological evaluation was performed in cohorts 1-3 at four-week post-movement (30 days, 42 days and 56 days post-implantation, respectively). In addition, five control animals were implanted with microelectrodes that were not moved. Control animals were implanted for (1) 30 days (n = 1), (2) 42 days (n = 2) and (3) 56 days (n = 2) prior to histological evaluation. Quantitative assessment of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) around the tip of the microelectrodes demonstrated that GFAP levels were similar around microelectrodes moved at day 2 when compared to the 30-day controls. However, GFAP expression levels around microelectrode tips that moved at day 14 and day 28 were significantly less than those around control microelectrodes implanted for 42 and 56 days, respectively. Therefore, we conclude that moving microelectrodes after implantation is a viable strategy that does not result in any additional damage to brain tissue. Further, moving the microelectrode downwards after 14 days of implantation may actually reduce the levels of GFAP expression around the tips of the microelectrodes in the long term.
植入后重新定位微电极正成为一种在单个神经元记录中实现长期可靠性的有前景的方法。本研究的主要目标是:(a)评估植入后大脑中微电极移动引起的胶质反应;(b)确定植入后微电极在大脑内移动会导致最小胶质反应的最佳时间窗。给11只Sprague-Dawley大鼠每只植入两个可在植入后在体内移动的微电极。研究了三个队列:(1)在第2天移动微电极(n = 4只动物),(2)在第14天移动微电极(n = 5只动物),(3)在第28天移动微电极(n = 2只动物)。在移动后四周(分别为植入后30天、42天和56天)对队列1 - 3进行组织学评估。此外,给5只对照动物植入未移动的微电极。在进行组织学评估前,对照动物分别植入(1) 30天(n = 1),(2) 42天(n = 2)和(3) 56天(n = 2)。对微电极尖端周围胶质纤维酸性蛋白(GFAP)的定量评估表明,与30天的对照相比,在第2天移动的微电极周围GFAP水平相似。然而,在第14天和第28天移动的微电极尖端周围的GFAP表达水平分别显著低于植入42天和56天的对照微电极周围的表达水平。因此,我们得出结论,植入后移动微电极是一种可行的策略,不会对脑组织造成任何额外损伤。此外,植入14天后向下移动微电极可能实际上会长期降低微电极尖端周围的GFAP表达水平。