Tanaka Yasushi, Daida Hiroyuki, Imai Yutaka, Miyauchi Katsumi, Sato Yasukazu, Hiwatari Masao, Kitagawa Akira, Kishimoto Junji, Yamazaki Tsutomu, Kawamori Ryuzo
Department of Medicine, St Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan.
Hypertens Res. 2009 Sep;32(9):770-4. doi: 10.1038/hr.2009.96. Epub 2009 Jun 26.
A 3-year multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label trial (ADVANCED-J) compared the effect of an increased dose of angiotensin-II receptor blocker (ARB) with that of a maintenance dose of ARB plus calcium channel blocker (amlodipine) on blood pressure (BP) control, nephropathy and atherosclerosis in patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertension in whom the usual ARB dose failed to control BP. A cross-sectional analysis using baseline data was conducted. Of 316 patients (recruited between September 2004 and December 2005), 228 patients were evaluated by multiple regression analysis using two models after randomization and exclusions. Model 1 assessed 13 baseline variables (age, sex, estimated diabetes duration, estimated hypertension duration, HbA1c, brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), high-sensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP), triglycerides (TGs), total cholesterol (TCHO), diabetic retinopathy (DMR), systolic morning home BP (HBP), diastolic morning HBP and brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV)) for correlation with the urinary albumin creatinine excretion rate (UACR). In model 2, systolic and diastolic morning HBP was replaced by systolic and diastolic office BP. The systolic morning HBP and systolic office BP or diastolic morning HBP and diastolic office BP correlations were weak, but significant (r=0.43 and 0.48, respectively). BNP, HbA1c, DMR and estimated diabetes duration were significantly correlated with UACR in both models 1 and 2. Although systolic office BP did not show a significant correlation with UACR in model 2, systolic morning HBP showed a significant correlation with UACR in model 1. Morning HBP, but not office BP, may be a significant marker of nephropathy in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes.
一项为期3年的多中心、前瞻性、随机、开放标签试验(ADVANCED-J)比较了增加剂量的血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂(ARB)与维持剂量的ARB加钙通道阻滞剂(氨氯地平)对2型糖尿病合并高血压且常规ARB剂量未能控制血压的患者的血压控制、肾病和动脉粥样硬化的影响。使用基线数据进行了横断面分析。在316例患者(于2004年9月至2005年12月招募)中,228例患者在随机分组和排除后使用两种模型进行了多元回归分析评估。模型1评估了13个基线变量(年龄、性别、估计糖尿病病程、估计高血压病程、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、脑钠肽(BNP)、高敏C反应蛋白(hsCRP)、甘油三酯(TGs)、总胆固醇(TCHO)、糖尿病视网膜病变(DMR)、早晨收缩期家庭血压(HBP)、早晨舒张期HBP和臂踝脉搏波速度(baPWV))与尿白蛋白肌酐排泄率(UACR)的相关性。在模型2中,早晨收缩期和舒张期HBP被诊室收缩压和舒张压取代。早晨收缩期HBP与诊室收缩压或早晨舒张期HBP与诊室舒张压之间的相关性较弱,但具有显著性(分别为r = 0.43和0.48)。在模型1和模型2中,BNP、HbA1c、DMR和估计糖尿病病程均与UACR显著相关。虽然在模型2中诊室收缩压与UACR未显示出显著相关性,但在模型1中早晨收缩期HBP与UACR显示出显著相关性。对于日本2型糖尿病患者,早晨HBP而非诊室血压可能是肾病的重要标志物。