James Matthew, Pannu Neesh
Departments of Medicine and Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta - Canada.
J Nephrol. 2009 May-Jun;22(3):295-305.
Acute kidney injury (AKI), as defined by small, often reversible changes in kidney function, has recently been recognized as an important complication in hospitalized patients, and has been consistently associated with prolonged hospital length of stay, increased associated costs and short-term mortality. Research studies on the epidemiology of AKI must address a number of unique methodological challenges, which have the potential to impact study results and validity. This review explores several methodological issues relevant to the design and conduct of observational studies that employ preexisting laboratory, administrative or research databases and that examine AKI as an outcome or an exposure. We discuss how methodological decisions may affect study results, particularly as they relate to selection bias, misclassification and confounding. Highlighting these areas may facilitate the design of studies of high methodological rigor that advance our understanding of AKI.
急性肾损伤(AKI)的定义是肾功能出现微小且通常可逆的变化,最近已被确认为住院患者的一种重要并发症,并且一直与住院时间延长、相关费用增加以及短期死亡率相关。关于AKI流行病学的研究必须应对一些独特的方法学挑战,这些挑战有可能影响研究结果和有效性。本综述探讨了与利用现有实验室、行政或研究数据库并将AKI作为结局或暴露因素进行检验的观察性研究的设计和实施相关的若干方法学问题。我们讨论了方法学决策如何可能影响研究结果,尤其是与选择偏倚、错误分类和混杂因素相关的情况。突出这些领域可能有助于设计出方法学严谨性高的研究,从而增进我们对AKI的理解。