Suppr超能文献

系统评价:标准剂量和双倍剂量质子泵抑制剂治疗重度糜烂性食管炎——随机对照试验的混合治疗比较。

Systematic review: standard- and double-dose proton pump inhibitors for the healing of severe erosive oesophagitis -- a mixed treatment comparison of randomized controlled trials.

机构信息

Outcomes Research, AstraZeneca UK Ltd, Luton, UK.

出版信息

Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009 Sep 15;30(6):547-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.04077.x. Epub 2009 Jun 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

No randomized controlled trial (RCT) has compared all European-licensed standard- and double-dose PPIs for the healing of severe erosive oesophagitis.

AIM

To compare the effectiveness of licensed doses of PPIs for healing severe erosive oesophagitis (i.e. esomeprazole 40 mg, lansoprazole 30 mg, omeprazole 20 mg and 40 mg, pantoprazole 40 mg and rabeprazole 20 mg).

METHODS

Systematic review of CENTRAL, EMBASE and MEDLINE for RCTs in patients with erosive oesophagitis (completed October 2008). Endoscopically verified healing rates at 4 and 8 weeks were extracted and re-calculated if not analysed by intention-to-treat. A mixed treatment comparison was used to combine direct treatment comparisons with indirect trial evidence while maintaining randomization. Odds ratios (OR) are reported compared to omeprazole 20 mg.

RESULTS

A total of 3021 papers were identified in the literature search; 12 were of sufficient quality to be included in the analysis. Insufficient data were available to included rabeprazole. Esomeprazole 40 mg was found to provide significantly higher healing rates at 4 weeks [OR 1.84, 95% Credible Interval (95% CrI): 1.50 to 2.22] and 8 weeks (OR 1.91, 95% CrI: 1.13 to 2.88). No other PPI investigated had significantly higher healing rates than omeprazole 20 mg.

CONCLUSION

Esomeprazole 40 mg consistently demonstrates higher healing rates compared with licensed standard- and double-dose PPIs.

摘要

背景

尚无随机对照试验(RCT)比较过所有获得欧洲许可的标准剂量和双倍剂量质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)治疗重度糜烂性食管炎的疗效。

目的

比较获得许可的 PPI 剂量治疗重度糜烂性食管炎(即埃索美拉唑 40mg、兰索拉唑 30mg、奥美拉唑 20mg 和 40mg、泮托拉唑 40mg 和雷贝拉唑 20mg)的疗效。

方法

对 CENTRAL、EMBASE 和 MEDLINE 中治疗糜烂性食管炎的 RCT 进行系统性评价(于 2008 年 10 月完成)。提取并重新计算了 4 周和 8 周时内镜下确认的愈合率,如果未按意向治疗进行分析,则进行重新计算。采用混合治疗比较法,在保持随机分组的同时,将直接治疗比较与间接试验证据结合起来。与奥美拉唑 20mg 相比,报告了比值比(OR)。

结果

文献检索共检出 3021 篇文献,其中 12 篇文献质量足够纳入分析。由于缺乏足够的数据,未将雷贝拉唑纳入分析。埃索美拉唑 40mg 在 4 周时(OR 1.84,95%可信区间[95%CrI]:1.50 至 2.22)和 8 周时(OR 1.91,95%CrI:1.13 至 2.88)的愈合率明显更高。其他研究的 PPI 与奥美拉唑 20mg 相比,均未显示出更高的愈合率。

结论

埃索美拉唑 40mg 与获得许可的标准剂量和双倍剂量 PPI 相比,始终显示出更高的愈合率。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验