Schwartz Marlene B, Lund Anne E, Grow H Mollie, McDonnell Elaine, Probart Claudia, Samuelson Anne, Lytle Leslie
Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520-8369, USA.
J Am Diet Assoc. 2009 Jul;109(7):1256-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2009.04.008.
In 2006, all local education agencies in the United States participating in the National School Lunch Program were required to establish school wellness policies that covered nutrition education, nutrition standards for school foods, and physical activity. The purpose of this psychometric study was to develop and evaluate the properties of a comprehensive and quantitative coding system to evaluate the quality of these policies. A 96-item coding tool was developed to evaluate seven goal areas: nutrition education, standards for US Department of Agriculture child nutrition programs and school meals, nutrition standards for competitive and other foods and beverages, physical education, physical activity, communication and promotion, and evaluation. Each goal area subscale and the total scale were scored on two dimensions: comprehensiveness and strength. Reliability was assessed by having pairs of researchers from four different states code a sample of 60 polices between July 2007 and July 2008. Goal area subscales were internally reliable (Cronbach's alpha=.60 to .93). Adequate interrater reliability scores were obtained at each level of scoring: total comprehensiveness and strength scores (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.82), subscale scores (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.70), and individual items (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.72). This coding system provided a reliable method for analyzing and comparing school district wellness policies in single or multistate studies.
2006年,美国所有参与国家学校午餐计划的地方教育机构都被要求制定涵盖营养教育、学校食品营养标准和体育活动的学校健康政策。这项心理测量研究的目的是开发和评估一个全面的定量编码系统的特性,以评估这些政策的质量。开发了一个包含96个条目的编码工具,用于评估七个目标领域:营养教育、美国农业部儿童营养计划和学校膳食标准、竞争性食品和其他食品及饮料的营养标准、体育教育、体育活动、沟通与推广以及评估。每个目标领域子量表和总量表都在两个维度上评分:全面性和力度。通过让来自四个不同州的研究人员对2007年7月至2008年7月期间的60份政策样本进行编码来评估信度。目标领域子量表具有内部信度(克朗巴哈系数为0.60至0.93)。在每个评分水平上都获得了足够的评分者间信度分数:总量表全面性和力度分数(组内相关系数0.82)、子量表分数(组内相关系数0.70)和单个条目(组内相关系数0.72)。这个编码系统为在单州或多州研究中分析和比较学区健康政策提供了一种可靠的方法。