Suppr超能文献

一项关于解剖学课程中基于团队学习的学生认知的调查:与成绩无关的积极看法。

A survey of student perceptions of team-based learning in anatomy curriculum: favorable views unrelated to grades.

作者信息

Vasan Nagaswami S, DeFouw David O, Compton Scott

机构信息

Department of Cell Biology and Molecular Medicine, New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey 07103, USA.

出版信息

Anat Sci Educ. 2009 Jul-Aug;2(4):150-5. doi: 10.1002/ase.91.

Abstract

Team-based learning (TBL) combines independent out of class preparation with in class small group discussion. We adopted TBL in teaching first year medical gross anatomy. In this study, we evaluated student perceptions of TBL by using a survey that elicited perceptions of both pedagogy and mode of learning. Anatomy lectures were replaced with required preclass readings, self-assessment quizzes, small group discussions of assignments, and groups retaking the same quizzes for deeper learning. At the course conclusion, students were surveyed to assess their preference for TBL, their perceptions of TBL effectiveness, and their perceptions of successful interpersonal relationships within groups. Respondents (n = 317; 89% response) were asked to rate the extent that they agreed (-2 = strongly disagree; -1 = disagree; 0 = neutral; 1 = agree; and 2 = strongly agree). A principal components factor analysis with varimax rotation identified two 8-item factors: "perceptions of TBL" and "perceptions of teamwork." Internal consistency for each was high [Cronbach's alpha = 0.908 (preference for TBL); 0.884 (preference of teamwork)]. Results of one-way analysis of variance between Honors/High Pass/Pass/Fail students indicated that Honors (n = 73) tended to rate perceptions of TBL higher than Pass (n = 54) [mean difference = 2.92; 95% CI (0.05, 5.79)], and also higher than Fail (n = 11) [mean difference = 6.30; 95% CI (1.13, 11.47)]. However, each had overall positive ratings. No difference was noted between mean ratings of teamwork, which were also, overall, positive. We conclude that medical students view TBL favorably irrespective of their grades.

摘要

基于团队的学习(TBL)将课外独立准备与课堂小组讨论相结合。我们在医学一年级大体解剖学教学中采用了TBL。在本研究中,我们通过一项调查来评估学生对TBL的看法,该调查引出了学生对教学法和学习模式的看法。解剖学讲座被课前必读材料、自我评估测验、作业小组讨论以及小组重新进行相同测验以加深学习所取代。在课程结束时,对学生进行了调查,以评估他们对TBL的偏好、对TBL有效性的看法以及对小组内成功人际关系的看法。要求受访者(n = 317;回复率89%)对他们同意的程度进行评分(-2 = 强烈不同意;-1 = 不同意;0 = 中立;1 = 同意;2 = 强烈同意)。采用方差最大化旋转的主成分因子分析确定了两个包含8个条目的因子:“对TBL的看法”和“对团队合作的看法”。每个因子的内部一致性都很高[克朗巴赫α系数 = 0.908(对TBL的偏好);0.884(对团队合作的偏好)]。优等/高分/及格/不及格学生之间的单因素方差分析结果表明,优等学生(n = 73)对TBL看法的评分往往高于及格学生(n = 54)[平均差异 = 2.92;95%置信区间(0.05,5.79)],也高于不及格学生(n = 11)[平均差异 = 6.30;95%置信区间(1.13,11.47)]。然而,每个人的总体评分都是积极的。团队合作的平均评分之间没有差异,总体上也是积极的。我们得出结论,医学生无论成绩如何,都对TBL持积极看法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验