Suppr超能文献

每周一次或每日两次给予艾塞那肽治疗可提高治疗满意度和体重相关生活质量。

Improved treatment satisfaction and weight-related quality of life with exenatide once weekly or twice daily.

机构信息

Amylin Pharmaceuticals Inc., San Diego, CA 92121, USA.

出版信息

Diabet Med. 2009 Jul;26(7):722-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2009.02752.x.

Abstract

AIMS

To assess treatment satisfaction and weight-related quality of life (QOL) in subjects with Type 2 diabetes treated with exenatide once weekly (QW) or twice daily (BID).

METHODS

In this 52-week randomized, multi-centre, open-label study, 295 subjects managed with diet and exercise and/or oral glucose-lowering medications received either exenatide QW or BID during weeks 1-30; thereafter, subjects receiving exenatide BID were switched to exenatide QW, with 258 total subjects receiving exenatide QW during weeks 30-52. Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire-status (DTSQ-s) and Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite (IWQOL-Lite) were assessed at baseline and weeks 30 and 52. Mean group changes from baseline to week 30 were estimated by ancova; changes from week 30 to week 52 were assessed by Student's t-test.

RESULTS

Statistically significant improvements from baseline to week 30 were observed in both treatment groups for DTSQ-s and IWQOL-Lite measures, with significantly greater reduction in perceived frequency of hyperglycaemia and greater satisfaction with continuing treatment in the QW group compared with the BID group. Effect sizes for change in DTSQ-s total scores were 0.84 QW, 0.64 BID; for IWQOL-Lite: 0.96 QW, 0.82 BID. Treatment satisfaction and QOL improved significantly between weeks 30 and 52 for those switching from BID to QW. Occurrence of adverse events did not affect patients' improvements in treatment satisfaction and QOL.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients treated with exenatide QW or BID experienced significant and clinically meaningful improvements in treatment satisfaction and QOL. Patients who switched from exenatide BID to exenatide QW administration reported further significant improvements.

摘要

目的

评估每周一次(QW)或每日两次(BID)给予艾塞那肽治疗 2 型糖尿病患者的治疗满意度和与体重相关的生活质量(QOL)。

方法

在这项为期 52 周的随机、多中心、开放性研究中,295 例饮食和运动以及/或口服降糖药物控制不佳的患者在第 1-30 周接受 QW 或 BID 治疗;此后,接受 BID 治疗的患者转换为 QW 治疗,共有 258 例患者在第 30-52 周接受 QW 治疗。分别于基线和第 30、52 周评估糖尿病治疗满意度问卷状态(DTSQ-s)和体重对生活质量的影响简表(IWQOL-Lite)。通过协方差分析估计从基线到第 30 周的平均组间变化;通过学生 t 检验评估从第 30 周到第 52 周的变化。

结果

QW 和 BID 两组患者的 DTSQ-s 和 IWQOL-Lite 测量值均从基线到第 30 周有统计学显著改善,QW 组与 BID 组相比,感知高血糖频率降低和继续治疗满意度提高更显著。DTSQ-s 总分变化的效应大小为 0.84 QW、0.64 BID;IWQOL-Lite:0.96 QW、0.82 BID。从第 30 周到第 52 周,从 BID 转换为 QW 的患者的治疗满意度和 QOL 显著改善。不良事件的发生并未影响患者治疗满意度和 QOL 的改善。

结论

QW 或 BID 治疗的患者在治疗满意度和 QOL 方面均有显著且具有临床意义的改善。从 BID 转换为 QW 治疗的患者报告了进一步的显著改善。

相似文献

1
2
DURATION-1: exenatide once weekly produces sustained glycemic control and weight loss over 52 weeks.
Diabetes Care. 2010 Jun;33(6):1255-61. doi: 10.2337/dc09-1914. Epub 2010 Mar 9.
4
Liraglutide Versus Exenatide Once Weekly: Persistence, Adherence, and Early Discontinuation.
Clin Ther. 2016 Jan 1;38(1):149-60. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2015.11.017. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
6
Clinical relevance of anti-exenatide antibodies: safety, efficacy and cross-reactivity with long-term treatment.
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2012 Jun;14(6):546-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2012.01561.x. Epub 2012 Feb 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Changes in Treatment Satisfaction Over 3 Years in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes After Initiating Second-line Treatment.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2022 Aug 18;107(9):2424-2432. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgac420.
2
Disutility of injectable therapies in obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus: general population preferences in the UK, Canada, and China.
Eur J Health Econ. 2023 Mar;24(2):187-196. doi: 10.1007/s10198-022-01470-w. Epub 2022 May 8.
3
Weekly Exenatide Therapy: A Real-World Comparison of Incretin Therapies.
J Pharm Technol. 2014 Aug;30(4):118-124. doi: 10.1177/8755122513518189. Epub 2014 Jan 7.
4
Therapeutic targets, novel drugs, and delivery systems for diabetes associated NAFLD and liver fibrosis.
Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2021 Sep;176:113888. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2021.113888. Epub 2021 Jul 24.
5
Impact of actual waiting time and perceived waiting time on treatment satisfaction in patients receiving outpatient diabetes care.
Diabetol Int. 2021 Jan 2;12(3):293-300. doi: 10.1007/s13340-020-00486-y. eCollection 2021 Jul.
7
GLP-1 receptor agonists: an updated review of head-to-head clinical studies.
Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab. 2021 Mar 9;12:2042018821997320. doi: 10.1177/2042018821997320. eCollection 2021.
9
Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Analogues in Type 2 Diabetes: Their Use and Differential Features.
Clin Drug Investig. 2019 Aug;39(8):805-819. doi: 10.1007/s40261-019-00826-0.
10
GLP-1 Receptor Agonists for Type 2 Diabetes and Their Role in Primary Care: An Australian Perspective.
Diabetes Ther. 2019 Aug;10(4):1205-1217. doi: 10.1007/s13300-019-0642-2. Epub 2019 Jun 10.

本文引用的文献

2
Exenatide once weekly versus twice daily for the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a randomised, open-label, non-inferiority study.
Lancet. 2008 Oct 4;372(9645):1240-50. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61206-4. Epub 2008 Sep 7.
4
An evaluation of an insulin transfer programme delivered in a group setting.
J Clin Nurs. 2007 Jul;16(7B):152-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.01772.x.
7
The mathematical relationship among different forms of responsiveness coefficients.
Qual Life Res. 2007 Jun;16(5):815-22. doi: 10.1007/s11136-007-9180-x. Epub 2007 Mar 10.
8
Evaluation of glargine group-start sessions in patients with type 2 diabetes as a strategy to deliver the service.
Int J Clin Pract. 2007 Feb;61(2):329-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2006.01190.x.
9
Recommendations for evaluating the validity of quality of life claims for labeling and promotion.
Value Health. 1999 Mar-Apr;2(2):113-27. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4733.1999.02210.x.
10
Electronic pill-boxes in the evaluation of oral hypoglycemic agent compliance.
Diabetes Metab. 2005 Apr;31(2):189-95. doi: 10.1016/s1262-3636(07)70185-4.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验