• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测特异性决定因素的集成方法:基准测试与验证

Ensemble approach to predict specificity determinants: benchmarking and validation.

作者信息

Chakrabarti Saikat, Panchenko Anna R

机构信息

National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

BMC Bioinformatics. 2009 Jul 2;10:207. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-207.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2105-10-207
PMID:19573245
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2716344/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

It is extremely important and challenging to identify the sites that are responsible for functional specification or diversification in protein families. In this study, a rigorous comparative benchmarking protocol was employed to provide a reliable evaluation of methods which predict the specificity determining sites. Subsequently, three best performing methods were applied to identify new potential specificity determining sites through ensemble approach and common agreement of their prediction results.

RESULTS

It was shown that the analysis of structural characteristics of predicted specificity determining sites might provide the means to validate their prediction accuracy. For example, we found that for smaller distances it holds true that the more reliable the prediction method is, the closer predicted specificity determining sites are to each other and to the ligand.

CONCLUSION

We observed certain similarities of structural features between predicted and actual subsites which might point to their functional relevance. We speculate that majority of the identified potential specificity determining sites might be indirectly involved in specific interactions and could be ideal target for mutagenesis experiments.

摘要

背景

识别蛋白质家族中负责功能特异性或多样化的位点极其重要且具有挑战性。在本研究中,采用了严格的比较基准测试方案,以对预测特异性决定位点的方法进行可靠评估。随后,应用三种表现最佳的方法,通过集成方法和其预测结果的共同一致性来识别新的潜在特异性决定位点。

结果

结果表明,对预测的特异性决定位点的结构特征进行分析可能为验证其预测准确性提供手段。例如,我们发现对于较小的距离,预测方法越可靠,预测的特异性决定位点彼此之间以及与配体的距离就越近,这一点是成立的。

结论

我们观察到预测的亚位点与实际亚位点之间在结构特征上存在某些相似性,这可能表明它们在功能上的相关性。我们推测,大多数已识别的潜在特异性决定位点可能间接参与特定相互作用,并且可能是诱变实验的理想靶点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/575a/2716344/0c90858c70f4/1471-2105-10-207-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/575a/2716344/a5ba93c163a1/1471-2105-10-207-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/575a/2716344/387acda52467/1471-2105-10-207-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/575a/2716344/0c90858c70f4/1471-2105-10-207-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/575a/2716344/a5ba93c163a1/1471-2105-10-207-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/575a/2716344/387acda52467/1471-2105-10-207-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/575a/2716344/0c90858c70f4/1471-2105-10-207-3.jpg

相似文献

1
Ensemble approach to predict specificity determinants: benchmarking and validation.预测特异性决定因素的集成方法:基准测试与验证
BMC Bioinformatics. 2009 Jul 2;10:207. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-207.
2
Continuous Automated Model EvaluatiOn (CAMEO) complementing the critical assessment of structure prediction in CASP12.连续自动模型评估(CAMEO)对蛋白质结构预测关键评估(CASP12)的补充
Proteins. 2018 Mar;86 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):387-398. doi: 10.1002/prot.25431. Epub 2017 Dec 17.
3
Introducing "best single template" models as reference baseline for the Continuous Automated Model Evaluation (CAMEO).引入“最佳单模板”模型作为连续自动化模型评估(CAMEO)的参考基准。
Proteins. 2019 Dec;87(12):1378-1387. doi: 10.1002/prot.25815. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
4
Prediction of ligand binding sites using homologous structures and conservation at CASP8.利用同源结构和保守性预测配体结合位点 CASP8.
Proteins. 2009;77 Suppl 9(Suppl 9):147-51. doi: 10.1002/prot.22513.
5
Protein-protein binding site prediction by local structural alignment.通过局部结构比对预测蛋白质-蛋白质结合位点。
J Chem Inf Model. 2010 Oct 25;50(10):1906-13. doi: 10.1021/ci100265x.
6
Analysis and prediction of functional sub-types from protein sequence alignments.基于蛋白质序列比对的功能亚类型分析与预测。
J Mol Biol. 2000 Oct 13;303(1):61-76. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4036.
7
OXBench: a benchmark for evaluation of protein multiple sequence alignment accuracy.OXBench:一种用于评估蛋白质多序列比对准确性的基准。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2003 Oct 10;4:47. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-4-47.
8
Prediction of amino acid positions specific for functional groups in a protein family based on local sequence similarity.基于局部序列相似性预测蛋白质家族中功能基团特有的氨基酸位置。
J Mol Recognit. 2016 Apr;29(4):159-69. doi: 10.1002/jmr.2515. Epub 2015 Nov 8.
9
Combining specificity determining and conserved residues improves functional site prediction.结合特异性决定残基和保守残基可改善功能位点预测。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2009 Jun 9;10:174. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-174.
10
A new protein binding pocket similarity measure based on comparison of clouds of atoms in 3D: application to ligand prediction.一种新的基于 3D 原子云比较的蛋白质结合口袋相似性度量方法:在配体预测中的应用。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2010 Feb 22;11:99. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-99.

引用本文的文献

1
Prediction of Protein Sites and Physicochemical Properties Related to Functional Specificity.与功能特异性相关的蛋白质位点和物理化学性质的预测
Bioengineering (Basel). 2021 Dec 3;8(12):201. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering8120201.
2
Deep Analysis of Residue Constraints (DARC): identifying determinants of protein functional specificity.深度解析残基约束(DARC):鉴定蛋白质功能特异性的决定因素。
Sci Rep. 2020 Feb 3;10(1):1691. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-55118-6.
3
Inferring joint sequence-structural determinants of protein functional specificity.

本文引用的文献

1
Evolutionary Trace Annotation Server: automated enzyme function prediction in protein structures using 3D templates.进化追踪注释服务器:使用3D模板对蛋白质结构进行酶功能自动预测。
Bioinformatics. 2009 Jun 1;25(11):1426-7. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp160. Epub 2009 Mar 23.
2
Coevolution in defining the functional specificity.在定义功能特异性方面的共同进化。
Proteins. 2009 Apr;75(1):231-40. doi: 10.1002/prot.22239.
3
Characterization and prediction of residues determining protein functional specificity.决定蛋白质功能特异性的残基的表征与预测。
推断蛋白质功能特异性的关节序列结构决定因素。
Elife. 2018 Jan 16;7:e29880. doi: 10.7554/eLife.29880.
4
Inference of Functionally-Relevant N-acetyltransferase Residues Based on Statistical Correlations.基于统计相关性推断功能相关的N-乙酰转移酶残基
PLoS Comput Biol. 2016 Dec 21;12(12):e1005294. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005294. eCollection 2016 Dec.
5
High-Resolution Identification of Specificity Determining Positions in the LacI Protein Family Using Ensembles of Sub-Sampled Alignments.使用子采样比对集合对LacI蛋白家族中特异性决定位点进行高分辨率鉴定。
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 28;11(9):e0162579. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162579. eCollection 2016.
6
SigniSite: Identification of residue-level genotype-phenotype correlations in protein multiple sequence alignments.SigniSite:在蛋白质多重序列比对中鉴定残基水平的基因型-表型相关性。
Nucleic Acids Res. 2013 Jul;41(Web Server issue):W286-91. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt497. Epub 2013 Jun 12.
7
Disentangling evolutionary signals: conservation, specificity determining positions and coevolution. Implication for catalytic residue prediction.解析进化信号:保守性、特异性决定位置和共进化。对催化残基预测的启示。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2012 Sep 14;13:235. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-13-235.
8
Automated hierarchical classification of protein domain subfamilies based on functionally-divergent residue signatures.基于功能分化残基特征的蛋白质结构域亚家族自动层次分类。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2012 Jun 22;13:144. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-13-144.
9
SPEER-SERVER: a web server for prediction of protein specificity determining sites.SPEER-SERVER:一个用于预测蛋白质特异性决定部位的网络服务器。
Nucleic Acids Res. 2012 Jul;40(Web Server issue):W242-8. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks559. Epub 2012 Jun 11.
10
Surveying the manifold divergence of an entire protein class for statistical clues to underlying biochemical mechanisms.全面审视整个蛋白质类别的多种差异,以获取有关潜在生化机制的统计线索。
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol. 2011;10(1):Article 36. doi: 10.2202/1544-6115.1666. Epub 2011 Aug 4.
Bioinformatics. 2008 Jul 1;24(13):1473-80. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn214. Epub 2008 May 1.
4
Multi-RELIEF: a method to recognize specificity determining residues from multiple sequence alignments using a Machine-Learning approach for feature weighting.多RELIEF:一种使用机器学习方法进行特征加权,从多序列比对中识别特异性决定残基的方法。
Bioinformatics. 2008 Jan 1;24(1):18-25. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm537. Epub 2007 Nov 17.
5
Determinants of protein function revealed by combinatorial entropy optimization.通过组合熵优化揭示蛋白质功能的决定因素。
Genome Biol. 2007;8(11):R232. doi: 10.1186/gb-2007-8-11-r232.
6
Functional specificity lies within the properties and evolutionary changes of amino acids.功能特异性存在于氨基酸的特性和进化变化之中。
J Mol Biol. 2007 Oct 26;373(3):801-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.08.036. Epub 2007 Aug 22.
7
Automated protein subfamily identification and classification.蛋白质亚家族的自动识别与分类
PLoS Comput Biol. 2007 Aug;3(8):e160. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030160.
8
Supervised multivariate analysis of sequence groups to identify specificity determining residues.对序列组进行监督多变量分析以鉴定特异性决定残基。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2007 Apr 23;8:135. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-8-135.
9
FlowerPower: clustering proteins into domain architecture classes for phylogenomic inference of protein function.花之力:将蛋白质聚类到结构域架构类别中以进行蛋白质功能的系统发育推断
BMC Evol Biol. 2007 Feb 8;7 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S12. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-7-S1-S12.
10
Sequence comparison by sequence harmony identifies subtype-specific functional sites.通过序列协调性进行序列比较可识别亚型特异性功能位点。
Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34(22):6540-8. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkl901. Epub 2006 Nov 27.