Suppr超能文献

定义高质量医疗保健。

Defining high quality health care.

作者信息

Cooperberg Matthew R, Birkmeyer John D, Litwin Mark S

机构信息

Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.

出版信息

Urol Oncol. 2009 Jul-Aug;27(4):411-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2009.01.015.

Abstract

Most health care quality improvement efforts target measures of health care structures, processes, and/or outcomes. Structural measures examine relatively fixed aspects of health care delivery such as physical plant and human resources. Process measures, the focus of the largest proportion of quality improvement efforts, assess specific transactions in clinical-patient encounters, such as use of appropriate surgical antibiotic prophylaxis, which are expected to improve outcomes. Outcome measures, which comprise quality of life endpoints as well as morbidity and mortality, are of greatest interest to clinicians and patients, but entail the greatest complexity, as the majority of variance in outcomes is attributable to patient and environmental factors that may not be readily modifiable. Selecting among structure, process, and outcome measures for quality improvement efforts generally will be dictated by the specific clinical situation for which improvement is desired. One aspect of health care quality that has received a great deal of attention in recent years is the relationship between surgical volume and health outcomes. Volume, an inherent characteristic of a health care facility or provider, is generally considered a structural measure of quality. Many studies have demonstrated a positive association between volume and outcomes, and policymakers in the private and public sectors have begun to consider volume in certification and reimbursement decisions. The volume-outcome association is not without controversy, however. Most studies in the field are limited by the nature of the administrative data on which they are based, and some studies have found that variation in quality within volume quantiles exceeds differences between quantiles. Moreover, regionalization driven by a focus on volume may exert adverse effects on access to care. The movement for health care quality improvement faces substantial methodological, clinical, financial, and political challenges. Despite these challenges, it is a movement that is gaining momentum, and the emphasis on quality in health care delivery is likely only to increase in the future. It is crucial, therefore, that physicians assume increasing leadership roles in efforts to define, measure, report, and improve quality of care.

摘要

大多数医疗质量改进工作都针对医疗结构、过程和/或结果的衡量指标。结构指标考察医疗服务中相对固定的方面,如医疗设施和人力资源。过程指标是质量改进工作中最大比例的重点,评估临床医患接触中的特定事务,如使用适当的手术抗生素预防措施,预期这些措施能改善结果。结果指标包括生活质量终点以及发病率和死亡率,是临床医生和患者最关注的,但也带来最大的复杂性,因为结果中的大部分差异可归因于患者和环境因素,而这些因素可能不易改变。在质量改进工作中选择结构、过程和结果指标通常将由期望改进的具体临床情况决定。近年来受到大量关注的医疗质量的一个方面是手术量与健康结果之间的关系。手术量是医疗机构或提供者的固有特征,通常被视为质量的结构指标。许多研究表明手术量与结果之间存在正相关,私营和公共部门的政策制定者已开始在认证和报销决策中考虑手术量。然而,手术量与结果的关联并非没有争议。该领域的大多数研究受其所依据的行政数据性质的限制,一些研究发现手术量分位数内的质量差异超过分位数之间的差异。此外,以手术量为重点推动的区域化可能对医疗服务的可及性产生不利影响。医疗质量改进运动面临重大的方法学、临床、财务和政治挑战。尽管存在这些挑战,但这是一个正在获得动力的运动,未来对医疗服务质量的强调可能只会增加。因此,至关重要的是,医生在界定、衡量、报告和改善医疗质量方面应发挥越来越重要的领导作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验