文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

有症状子宫肌瘤女性的腹腔镜检查与小切口剖腹术:一项前瞻性随机研究。

Laparoscopy vs minilaparotomy in women with symptomatic uterine myomas: a prospective randomized study.

作者信息

Cicinelli Ettore, Tinelli Raffaele, Colafiglio Giuseppe, Saliani Nicola

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Bari Medical School, Bari, Italy.

出版信息

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2009 Jul-Aug;16(4):422-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2009.03.011.


DOI:10.1016/j.jmig.2009.03.011
PMID:19573818
Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes in patients with symptomatic uterine myomas who underwent laparoscopic (LPS) or minilaparotomic (MLPT) myomectomy. DESIGN: Prospective randomized study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS: Eighty patients with no more than 3 uterine myomas of maximal diameter of 7 cm. INTERVENTION: Either LPS or MLPT myomectomy. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Mean blood loss, mean duration of postoperative ileus, and mean decrease in hemoglobin were significantly lower in the LPS compared with the MLPT group (p < .001). Mean operative time was not significantly longer in the LPS group compared with the MLPT group. Duration of hospitalization was significantly shorter in the LPS compared with the MLPT group (p < .001). No intraoperative complications were observed during MLPT. In 1 patient, conversion from LPS to MLPT was necessary because of difficulty in reconstructing the uterine wall. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic myomectomy is a suitable alternative to MLPT in women with 1 to 3 myomas. However, preoperative careful evaluation of the size and sites of the myomas is necessary to avert conversion and prevent complications.

摘要

目的:比较接受腹腔镜(LPS)或小切口开腹(MLPT)子宫肌瘤剔除术的有症状子宫肌瘤患者的治疗结果。 设计:前瞻性随机研究(加拿大工作组分类II-2)。 地点:大学医院。 患者:80例患者,子宫肌瘤不超过3个,最大直径为7厘米。 干预措施:LPS或MLPT子宫肌瘤剔除术。 测量指标及主要结果:与MLPT组相比,LPS组的平均失血量、术后平均肠梗阻持续时间和平均血红蛋白下降幅度显著更低(p < .001)。与MLPT组相比,LPS组的平均手术时间并无显著延长。与MLPT组相比,LPS组的住院时间显著更短(p < .001)。MLPT术中未观察到并发症。有1例患者因子宫壁重建困难,需由LPS转为MLPT。 结论:对于有1至3个肌瘤的女性,腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术是MLPT的合适替代方法。然而,术前需仔细评估肌瘤的大小和位置,以避免中转手术并预防并发症。

相似文献

[1]
Laparoscopy vs minilaparotomy in women with symptomatic uterine myomas: a prospective randomized study.

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2009

[2]
Laparoscopic myomectomy: do size, number, and location of the myomas form limiting factors for laparoscopic myomectomy?

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008

[3]
Randomized study of laparoscopic versus minilaparotomic myomectomy for uterine myomas.

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2006

[4]
A prospective study of laparoscopy versus minilaparotomy in the treatment of uterine myomas.

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2005

[5]
Laparoscopy versus minilaparotomy in women with symptomatic uterine myomas: short-term and fertility results.

Fertil Steril. 2009-3-14

[6]
Efficacy of combined laparoscopic uterine artery occlusion and myomectomy via minilaparotomy in the treatment of recurrent uterine myomas.

Fertil Steril. 2007-2

[7]
A randomized, controlled study comparing minilaparotomy versus isobaric gasless laparoscopic assisted minilaparotomy myomectomy for removal of large uterine myomas: short-term outcomes.

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009-7

[8]
Single-port laparoscopic myomectomy using a new single-port transumbilical morcellation system: initial clinical study.

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010-6-23

[9]
Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy versus abdominal myomectomy: a comparison of short-term surgical outcomes and immediate costs.

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007

[10]
Laparoscopic uterine vessel occlusion in the treatment of women with symptomatic uterine myomas with and without adding laparoscopic myomectomy: 4-year results.

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008

引用本文的文献

[1]
Perioperative and reproductive outcomes' comparison of mini-laparotomy and laparoscopic myomectomy in the management of uterine leiomyomas: a systematic review.

Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024-3

[2]
Comparison of surgical and obstetric outcomes in women with uterine leiomyomas after laparoscopic vs. abdominal myomectomy: A single-center cohort study.

Front Surg. 2022-12-26

[3]
Factors influencing surgical outcomes of laparoscopic myomectomy. A propensity-score matched analysis.

Prz Menopauzalny. 2022-9

[4]
The effects and costs of laparoscopic versus abdominal myomectomy in patients with uterine fibroids: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BMC Surg. 2020-3-20

[5]
Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy: current status.

Robot Surg. 2017-1-23

[6]
Potential of minimally invasive procedures in the treatment of uterine fibroids: a focus on magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound therapy.

Int J Womens Health. 2015-11-13

[7]
Plastic and reconstructive uterus operations by minimally invasive surgery? A review on myomectomy.

GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW. 2012-1-9

[8]
Minimally invasive surgical techniques versus open myomectomy for uterine fibroids.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014-10-21

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索