Ross Randal G, Greco-Sanders Linda, Laudenslager Mark, Reite Martin
University of Colorado Denver, Department of Psychiatry, Bldg. 500, Box F546, 13001 E 17th Pl, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
Acad Psychiatry. 2009 May-Jun;33(3):234-40. doi: 10.1176/appi.ap.33.3.234.
The National Institute of Mental Health funds institutional National Research Service Awards (NRSA) to provide postdoctoral research training. While peer-reviewed publications are the most common outcome measure utilized, there has been little discussion of how publications should be counted or what factors impact the long-term publication rates of trainees in these programs.
The authors reviewed current curricula vitae from 92 graduates of an institutional NRSA and from the faculty mentors of that program to assess publications through 2005. Publications were weighted based on peer versus non-peer-reviewed and authorship position. Trainee and mentor factors were assessed for their impact on publication rates and on becoming principal investigators of larger scale federal grants such as a National Institutes of Health (NIH) R01.
Weighted publication scores correlate with total publication rates at such a high rate that the two scores can be used interchangeably. Forty-three percent of graduates average at least one publication per year after completing the postdoctoral program; 20% were listed as an independent investigator on a larger federal grant. The number of publications published during postdoctoral training and additional funded training beyond that provided by the institutional NRSA are correlated with increased posttraining program publication rates; other factors including gender, terminal degree, number of publications prior to postdoctoral training, and mentor variables had no significant impact. Additional funded training, male gender, and increased time since completion of the training are associated with increased likelihood of larger grant federal funding.
Weighting publications by whether they were peer-reviewed and by authorship position appears to have little benefit over a simple counting of the number of publications. Publication during research training and the pursuit of funding for additional individual research training may be appropriate short-term goals within an institutional research training program.
美国国立精神卫生研究所为机构的国家研究服务奖(NRSA)提供资金,以开展博士后研究培训。虽然同行评审的出版物是最常用的成果衡量指标,但对于如何计算出版物数量以及哪些因素会影响这些项目中学员的长期发表率,几乎没有进行过讨论。
作者查阅了某机构NRSA的92名毕业生及其导师的当前简历,以评估截至2005年的出版物情况。根据同行评审与非同行评审以及作者身份对出版物进行加权。评估学员和导师因素对发表率以及成为诸如美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)R01等大规模联邦资助项目的主要研究者的影响。
加权发表分数与总发表率的相关性非常高,以至于这两个分数可以互换使用。43%的毕业生在完成博士后项目后平均每年至少发表一篇论文;20%的人被列为大型联邦资助项目的独立研究者。博士后培训期间发表的论文数量以及机构NRSA提供的培训之外的额外资助培训与培训后项目发表率的提高相关;其他因素,包括性别、最终学位、博士后培训前的论文数量以及导师变量,均无显著影响。额外资助培训、男性性别以及培训完成后时间的增加与获得大型联邦资助的可能性增加相关。
根据出版物是否经过同行评审以及作者身份进行加权,与简单计算出版物数量相比似乎益处不大。在机构研究培训项目中,研究培训期间发表论文以及争取额外个人研究培训的资金可能是合适的短期目标。