Suppr超能文献

对空间频率和方向内容的敏感性并非面部感知所特有。

Sensitivity to spatial frequency and orientation content is not specific to face perception.

作者信息

Williams N Rankin, Willenbockel Verena, Gauthier Isabel

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37203, USA.

出版信息

Vision Res. 2009 Sep;49(19):2353-62. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.06.019. Epub 2009 Jul 1.

Abstract

Prior work using a matching task between images that were complementary in spatial frequency and orientation information suggested that the representation of faces, but not objects, retains low-level spatial frequency (SF) information [Biederman, I., & Kalocsai, P. (1997). Neurocomputational bases of object and face recognition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B Biological Sciences, 352, 1203-1219]. In two experiments, we reexamine the claim that face perception is uniquely sensitive to changes in SF. In contrast to prior work, we used a design allowing the computation of sensitivity and response criterion for each category, and in one experiment, equalized low-level image properties across object categories. In both experiments, we find that observers are sensitive to SF and orientation changes for upright and inverted faces and non-face objects. Differential response biases across categories contributed to a larger sensitivity for faces, but even sensitivity showed a larger effect for faces, especially when faces were upright and in a front-facing view. However, when objects were inverted, or upright but shown in a three-quarter view, the matching of objects and faces was equally sensitive to SF changes. Accordingly, face perception does not appear to be uniquely affected by changes in spatial filter components.

摘要

先前使用在空间频率和方向信息上互补的图像之间的匹配任务的研究表明,面部(而非物体)的表征保留了低层次的空间频率(SF)信息[比德曼,I.,& 卡洛蔡,P.(1997年)。物体和面部识别的神经计算基础。《伦敦皇家学会哲学学报》,B辑:生物科学,352,1203 - 1219]。在两项实验中,我们重新审视了面部感知对空间频率变化具有独特敏感性这一观点。与先前的研究不同,我们采用了一种设计,能够计算每个类别(此处原文category指代不明,结合前文推测可能是面部和物体类别)的敏感性和反应标准,并且在一项实验中,使各个物体类别之间的低层次图像属性达到均衡。在这两项实验中,我们发现观察者对正立和倒立的面部以及非面部物体的空间频率和方向变化都很敏感。不同类别之间的反应偏差导致对面部的敏感性更高,但即使是同等敏感性,对面部的影响也更大,尤其是当面部正立且呈正面视图时。然而,当物体倒立,或者正立但呈四分之三视图时,物体和面部的匹配对空间频率变化同样敏感。因此,面部感知似乎并非唯一地受到空间滤波器组件变化的影响。

相似文献

3
Spatial frequency tuning of upright and inverted face identification.直立和倒置面部识别的空间频率调谐
Vision Res. 2008 Dec;48(28):2817-26. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.09.015. Epub 2008 Oct 18.
6
The face inversion effect or the face upright effect?面部倒置效应还是面部正立效应?
Cognition. 2023 Mar;232:105335. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105335. Epub 2022 Nov 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Perceptual Decision-Making Regarding Phylogenetically Salient Stimuli.关于系统发育显著刺激的知觉决策
Affect Sci. 2024 Sep 26;6(1):145-158. doi: 10.1007/s42761-024-00271-z. eCollection 2025 Mar.
6
Horizontal information drives the behavioral signatures of face processing.水平信息驱动面部加工的行为特征。
Front Psychol. 2010 Sep 28;1:143. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00143. eCollection 2010.

本文引用的文献

2
A visual short-term memory advantage for objects of expertise.专业领域物体的视觉短期记忆优势。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Feb;35(1):94-107. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.35.1.94.
4
Configural processing and face viewpoint.构型加工与面部视角
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2008 Apr;34(2):310-27. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.2.310.
6
How does the brain process upright and inverted faces?大脑如何处理正立和倒立的面孔?
Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev. 2002 Mar;1(1):63-75. doi: 10.1177/1534582302001001004.
7
The deleterious effect of contrast reversal on recognition is unique to faces, not objects.
Vision Res. 2007 Jul;47(16):2134-42. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.04.007. Epub 2007 Jun 11.
9
Can generic expertise explain special processing for faces?一般专业知识能解释对面孔的特殊加工吗?
Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Jan;11(1):8-15. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.002. Epub 2006 Nov 28.
10
What makes faces special?是什么让面部如此特别?
Vision Res. 2006 Oct;46(22):3802-11. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.06.017. Epub 2006 Aug 30.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验