Williams N Rankin, Willenbockel Verena, Gauthier Isabel
Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37203, USA.
Vision Res. 2009 Sep;49(19):2353-62. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.06.019. Epub 2009 Jul 1.
Prior work using a matching task between images that were complementary in spatial frequency and orientation information suggested that the representation of faces, but not objects, retains low-level spatial frequency (SF) information [Biederman, I., & Kalocsai, P. (1997). Neurocomputational bases of object and face recognition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B Biological Sciences, 352, 1203-1219]. In two experiments, we reexamine the claim that face perception is uniquely sensitive to changes in SF. In contrast to prior work, we used a design allowing the computation of sensitivity and response criterion for each category, and in one experiment, equalized low-level image properties across object categories. In both experiments, we find that observers are sensitive to SF and orientation changes for upright and inverted faces and non-face objects. Differential response biases across categories contributed to a larger sensitivity for faces, but even sensitivity showed a larger effect for faces, especially when faces were upright and in a front-facing view. However, when objects were inverted, or upright but shown in a three-quarter view, the matching of objects and faces was equally sensitive to SF changes. Accordingly, face perception does not appear to be uniquely affected by changes in spatial filter components.
先前使用在空间频率和方向信息上互补的图像之间的匹配任务的研究表明,面部(而非物体)的表征保留了低层次的空间频率(SF)信息[比德曼,I.,& 卡洛蔡,P.(1997年)。物体和面部识别的神经计算基础。《伦敦皇家学会哲学学报》,B辑:生物科学,352,1203 - 1219]。在两项实验中,我们重新审视了面部感知对空间频率变化具有独特敏感性这一观点。与先前的研究不同,我们采用了一种设计,能够计算每个类别(此处原文category指代不明,结合前文推测可能是面部和物体类别)的敏感性和反应标准,并且在一项实验中,使各个物体类别之间的低层次图像属性达到均衡。在这两项实验中,我们发现观察者对正立和倒立的面部以及非面部物体的空间频率和方向变化都很敏感。不同类别之间的反应偏差导致对面部的敏感性更高,但即使是同等敏感性,对面部的影响也更大,尤其是当面部正立且呈正面视图时。然而,当物体倒立,或者正立但呈四分之三视图时,物体和面部的匹配对空间频率变化同样敏感。因此,面部感知似乎并非唯一地受到空间滤波器组件变化的影响。