• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用德尔菲法让利益相关者参与:两项研究的比较

Using the Delphi method to engage stakeholders: a comparison of two studies.

作者信息

Geist Monica R

机构信息

University of Northern Colorado, McKee Hall 531, Campus Box 124, Greeley, CO 80639, USA.

出版信息

Eval Program Plann. 2010 May;33(2):147-54. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2009.06.006. Epub 2009 Jun 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2009.06.006
PMID:19581002
Abstract

Involving stakeholders can greatly impact evaluation results. The Delphi method, a consensus-building tool, is a promising process to promote and encourage involvement from all stakeholders during the evaluation framing process. The Delphi method removes geographic challenges and time boundaries allowing all stakeholders to participate. The Delphi method uses a series of surveys interspersed with controlled feedback designed to gather information and build consensus without requiring face-to-face meetings. Two different formats of the Delphi method, a paper-and-pencil, postal-mail version and a web-based, real-time computer version are compared in this study. Both versions of the Delphi were administered to a non-profit community based organization as part of framing an evaluation. Participation rates were better with the paper-pencil version. The quantity and quality of data collected were comparable in both versions.

摘要

让利益相关者参与进来会极大地影响评估结果。德尔菲法作为一种建立共识的工具,是在评估框架制定过程中促进和鼓励所有利益相关者参与的一种很有前景的方法。德尔菲法消除了地理障碍和时间限制,使所有利益相关者都能参与。该方法通过一系列穿插有可控反馈的调查来收集信息并达成共识,无需面对面会议。本研究比较了德尔菲法的两种不同形式,即纸笔邮寄版和基于网络的实时计算机版。作为评估框架制定的一部分,两种版本的德尔菲法都应用于一个非营利性社区组织。纸笔版本的参与率更高。两个版本收集的数据在数量和质量上相当。

相似文献

1
Using the Delphi method to engage stakeholders: a comparison of two studies.运用德尔菲法让利益相关者参与:两项研究的比较
Eval Program Plann. 2010 May;33(2):147-54. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2009.06.006. Epub 2009 Jun 21.
2
Consulting the oracle: ten lessons from using the Delphi technique in nursing research.咨询神谕:护理研究中使用德尔菲技术的十条经验教训。
J Adv Nurs. 2006 Jan;53(2):205-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03716.x.
3
A comparison of two consensus methods for classifying morbidities in a single professional group showed the same outcomes.对单一专业群体中疾病分类的两种共识方法进行比较,结果显示相同。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Nov;59(11):1169-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.02.016. Epub 2006 Jul 26.
4
The Delphi process in dental research.牙科研究中的德尔菲法。
J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2008 Dec;8(4):211-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2008.09.002.
5
Protocol of the COSMIN study: COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments.COSMIN研究方案:基于共识的健康测量工具选择标准
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006 Jan 24;6:2. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-6-2.
6
Consensus principles for wound care research obtained using a Delphi process.采用 Delphi 法获得的伤口护理研究共识原则。
Wound Repair Regen. 2012 May-Jun;20(3):284-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2012.00790.x.
7
A comparison of formal consensus methods used for developing clinical guidelines.用于制定临床指南的正式共识方法比较。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2006 Oct;11(4):218-24. doi: 10.1258/135581906778476553.
8
Use of the Delphi technique to develop standards for quality assessment in diagnostic radiology.运用德尔菲法制定诊断放射学质量评估标准。
Community Dent Health. 1995 Dec;12(4):194-9.
9
Metadata-driven Delphi rating on the Internet.互联网上基于元数据驱动的德尔菲评级法。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2005 Jan;77(1):49-56. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2004.05.006.
10
[Methodology of a study on insomnia in the general population].[普通人群失眠症研究的方法学]
Encephale. 2002 May-Jun;28(3 Pt 1):217-26.

引用本文的文献

1
Prioritizing orthopaedic evidence uncertainties : expert consensus based on a modified DELPHI study and a focus group.确定骨科证据的不确定性优先级:基于改进的德尔菲研究和焦点小组的专家共识
Bone Jt Open. 2025 Feb 18;6(2):206-214. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.62.BJO-2024-0053.R1.
2
Development of a mental health-related structural stigma measurement framework in the healthcare system setting: A modified Delphi study.医疗系统环境中与心理健康相关的结构性污名测量框架的开发:一项改良德尔菲研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 31;20(1):e0316999. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316999. eCollection 2025.
3
An International Research Agenda for Oral Health Birth Cohort Studies.
口腔健康出生队列研究的国际研究议程。
J Dent Res. 2025 Feb;104(2):147-154. doi: 10.1177/00220345241286869. Epub 2024 Dec 4.
4
Learning health systems and evidence ecosystems: a perspective on the future of evidence-based medicine and evidence-based guideline development.学习型卫生系统和证据生态系统:对循证医学和循证指南制定未来的展望。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Jan 4;22(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-01095-2.
5
Guidelines for Evaluating Clinical Research Training using Competency Assessments.使用能力评估来评估临床研究培训的指南。
MedEdPublish (2016). 2020 Sep 22;8:202. doi: 10.15694/mep.2019.000202.2. eCollection 2019.
6
Setting research priorities for prevention and response to child marriage in communities in the Arab region: findings from a multi-stage Delphi study involving practitioners across the region.为阿拉伯地区社区制定预防和应对童婚的研究重点:一项多阶段德尔菲研究在该地区的从业人员中的调查结果。
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2023 Dec;31(1):2275840. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2023.2275840. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
7
Mapping a comprehensive assessment tool to a holistic definition of health for person-centred care planning in home care: a modified eDelphi study.为居家护理中的以患者为中心的护理计划制定全面评估工具与整体健康定义建立映射关系:一项改良版 e Delphi 研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Nov 16;23(1):1268. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10203-5.
8
Are older people worse off in 2040 regarding health and resources to deal with it? - Future developments in complex health problems and in the availability of resources to manage health problems in the Netherlands.2040 年,老年人在健康和应对资源方面的情况会更糟吗?——荷兰复杂健康问题的未来发展及管理健康问题资源的可利用性。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jun 16;11:942526. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.942526. eCollection 2023.
9
Enhancing Veteran Community Reintegration Research (ENCORE): Protocol for a Mixed Methods and Stakeholder Engagement Project.增强退伍军人社区重新融入研究(ENCORE):混合方法与利益相关者参与项目方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Mar 14;12:e42029. doi: 10.2196/42029.
10
Attributes development for a discrete choice experiment on preferences in sexual and reproductive health services for adolescents and young people in Nigeria.属性发展用于在尼日利亚青少年和年轻人的性和生殖健康服务偏好的离散选择实验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Dec 12;22(1):1511. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08888-1.