Andrews J M
Department of Microbiology, Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS Trust, City Hospital, Birmingham B18 7QH, UK.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2009 Sep;64(3):454-89. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkp244. Epub 2009 Jul 8.
There have been considerable changes to the format of the recommendations since the previous version (version 7). The majority of the footnotes to the tables have been removed and the notations added to the end column; it is hoped that this change will avoid confusion in interpretation. Antibiotics have been separated into groups, e.g. beta-lactams, aminoglycosides, etc. Recommendations for urinary tract infections (UTIs) have been removed for most agents except for those that are administered solely for the treatment of uncomplicated UTIs or where there are limited recommendations for specific organisms, e.g. trimethoprim. For agents that previously had dual recommendations, systemic recommendations remain and the intermediate category can be used for interpretation for UTIs because intermediate susceptibility infers that the infection may respond as the agent is concentrated at the site of infection. This change will also avoid errors in interpretation when an organism is isolated from multiple sites, e.g. blood and urine. The changes that have been made to version 7 are as follows: MIC and zone diameter breakpoints (BPs) for trimethoprim, fosfomycin and nitrofurantoin for UTIs (Table 7); MIC and zone diameter breakpoints (BPs) for doripenem (Tables 7-9); colistin MIC BPs for Pseudomonas spp. (Table 9), co-trimoxazole MIC BPs for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (Table 10); staphylococci MIC and zone diameter BPs for clarithromycin, clindamycin, erythromycin, quinupristin/dalfopristin, trimethoprim UTI, nitrofurantoin UTI and rifampicin (Table 11); Streptococcus pneumoniae MIC and zone diameter BPs for azithromycin, clarithromycin, erythromycin, co-trimoxazole, linezolid, rifampicin and telithromycin (Table 12); addition of streptomycin recommendations for enterococci (Table 13); enterococcal MIC and zone diameter BPs for quinupristin/dalfopristin, nitrofurantoin UTI and trimethoprim UTI (Table 13); beta-haemolytic streptococci MIC and zone diameter BPs for azithromycin, clarithromycin, erythromycin and telithromycin (Table 15); clarithromycin and erythromycin MIC and zone diameter BPs for Moraxella catarrhalis (Table 16); azithromycin MIC BPs for Neisseria gonorrhoeae (Table 17); chloramphenicol and rifampicin MIC BPs for Neisseria meningitidis (Table 18); azithromycin MIC BPs for Haemophilus influenzae (Table 19); MIC BPs for metronidazole for Bacteroides fragilis, Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron and Clostridium perfringens (Tables 23-25, respectively); susceptibility testing of Listeria spp. (Appendix 3); the acceptable range for ATCC 25923 to a 10 microg tobramycin disc (Table 26).
自上一版(第7版)以来,推荐内容的格式有了相当大的变化。表格的大多数脚注已被删除,注释添加到了最后一列;希望这一变化能避免解释上的混淆。抗生素已被分成不同类别,如β-内酰胺类、氨基糖苷类等。除了仅用于治疗单纯性尿路感染的药物或针对特定病原体推荐有限的药物(如甲氧苄啶)外,大多数药物针对尿路感染的推荐内容已被删除。对于以前有双重推荐的药物,全身性推荐仍然保留,中间类别可用于尿路感染的解释,因为中度敏感性意味着感染可能会对该药物产生反应,因为该药物在感染部位会浓缩。这一变化还将避免当从多个部位(如血液和尿液)分离出一种病原体时在解释上出现错误。对第7版所做的更改如下:尿路感染时甲氧苄啶、磷霉素和呋喃妥因的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)和抑菌圈直径断点(BPs)(表7);多黏菌素MIC和抑菌圈直径断点(BPs)(表7 - 9);铜绿假单胞菌的黏菌素MIC断点(表9),嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌的复方新诺明MIC断点(表10);葡萄球菌对克拉霉素、克林霉素、红霉素、奎奴普丁/达福普汀、尿路感染用甲氧苄啶、尿路感染用呋喃妥因和利福平的MIC和抑菌圈直径BPs(表11);肺炎链球菌对阿奇霉素、克拉霉素、红霉素、复方新诺明、利奈唑胺、利福平和泰利霉素的MIC和抑菌圈直径BPs(表12);增加了肠球菌对链霉素的推荐(表13);肠球菌对奎奴普丁/达福普汀、尿路感染用呋喃妥因和尿路感染用甲氧苄啶的MIC和抑菌圈直径BPs(表13);β-溶血性链球菌对阿奇霉素、克拉霉素、红霉素和泰利霉素的MIC和抑菌圈直径BPs(表15);卡他莫拉菌对克拉霉素和红霉素的MIC和抑菌圈直径BPs(表16);淋病奈瑟菌对阿奇霉素的MIC断点(表17);脑膜炎奈瑟菌对氯霉素和利福平的MIC断点(表18);流感嗜血杆菌对阿奇霉素的MIC断点(表19);脆弱拟杆菌、多形拟杆菌和产气荚膜梭菌对甲硝唑的MIC断点(分别为表23 - 25);李斯特菌属的药敏试验(附录3);ATCC 25923对10微克硫酸妥布霉素纸片的可接受范围(表26)。