• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

物有所值还是选择健康:按比例定价对消费者份量选择的影响。

Value for money or making the healthy choice: the impact of proportional pricing on consumers' portion size choices.

机构信息

Institute for Health Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Public Health. 2010 Feb;20(1):65-9. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckp092. Epub 2009 Jul 8.

DOI:10.1093/eurpub/ckp092
PMID:19587232
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Large food portion sizes are determinants of a high caloric intake, especially if they have been made attractive through value size pricing (i.e. lower unit prices for large than for small portion sizes). The purpose of the two questionnaire studies that are reported in this article was to assess the impact of proportional pricing (i.e. removing beneficial prices for large sizes) on people's portion size choices of high caloric food and drink items.

METHODS

Both studies employed an experimental design with a proportional pricing condition and a value size pricing condition. Study 1 was conducted in a fast food restaurant (N = 150) and study 2 in a worksite cafeteria (N = 141). Three different food products (i.e. soft drink, chicken nuggets in study 1 and a hot meal in study 2) with corresponding prices were displayed on pictures in the questionnaire. Outcome measures were consumers' intended portion size choices.

RESULTS

No main effects of pricing were found. However, confronted with proportional pricing a trend was found for overweight fast food restaurant visitors being more likely to choose small portion sizes of chicken nuggets (OR = 4.31, P = 0.07) and less likely to choose large soft drink sizes (OR = 0.07, P = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Among a general public, proportional pricing did not reduce consumers' size choices. However, pricing strategies can help overweight and obese consumers selecting appropriate portion sizes of soft drink and high caloric snacks. More research in realistic settings with actual behaviour as outcome measure is required.

摘要

背景

食物份量过大是高热量摄入的决定因素,尤其是如果这些食物通过超值份量定价(即大份量的单位价格低于小份量)变得更有吸引力。本文报告的两项问卷调查研究旨在评估比例定价(即取消大份量的优惠价格)对人们选择高热量食物和饮料份量的影响。

方法

两项研究均采用实验设计,设有比例定价条件和超值份量定价条件。研究 1 在一家快餐店(N=150)进行,研究 2 在一家工作场所自助餐厅(N=141)进行。问卷中以图片形式展示了三种不同的食品(即软饮料、鸡块(研究 1)和热餐(研究 2))及其相应价格。主要观察指标为消费者的预期份量选择。

结果

未发现定价的主要影响。然而,面对比例定价,快餐店超重访客更倾向于选择小份量的鸡块(OR=4.31,P=0.07)和不太可能选择大份量的软饮料(OR=0.07,P=0.04),这一趋势明显。

结论

在一般公众中,比例定价并未减少消费者的份量选择。然而,定价策略可以帮助超重和肥胖消费者选择适当的软饮料和高热量零食份量。需要在实际行为作为结果测量的现实环境中进行更多的研究。

相似文献

1
Value for money or making the healthy choice: the impact of proportional pricing on consumers' portion size choices.物有所值还是选择健康:按比例定价对消费者份量选择的影响。
Eur J Public Health. 2010 Feb;20(1):65-9. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckp092. Epub 2009 Jul 8.
2
Portion size labeling and intended soft drink consumption: the impact of labeling format and size portfolio.份量大小标注与软性饮料饮用量:标注格式与大小组合的影响。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2010 Nov-Dec;42(6):422-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2010.02.002.
3
Portion size: a qualitative study of consumers' attitudes toward point-of-purchase interventions aimed at portion size.份量大小:一项针对消费者对针对份量大小的购买点干预措施的态度的定性研究。
Health Educ Res. 2010 Feb;25(1):109-20. doi: 10.1093/her/cyp051. Epub 2009 Sep 11.
4
Characteristics of self-selected portion size in young adults.年轻成年人自主选择食物分量的特点。
J Am Diet Assoc. 2007 Apr;107(4):611-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2007.01.006.
5
Half-size me? How calorie and price information influence ordering on restaurant menus with both half and full entrée portion sizes.让菜品分量减半?卡路里和价格信息如何影响有半份和全份主菜分量的餐厅菜单点餐情况。
Appetite. 2016 Feb 1;97:127-37. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.11.031. Epub 2015 Nov 30.
6
Children's preference for large portions: prevalence, determinants, and consequences.儿童对大份食物的偏好:患病率、决定因素及后果。
J Am Diet Assoc. 2007 Jul;107(7):1183-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2007.04.012.
7
Small portion sizes in worksite cafeterias: do they help consumers to reduce their food intake?工作场所自助餐厅的小份食品:它们是否有助于消费者减少食物摄入量?
Int J Obes (Lond). 2011 Sep;35(9):1200-7. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2010.271. Epub 2011 Jan 11.
8
Portion distortion: typical portion sizes selected by young adults.份量偏差:年轻人选择的典型份量大小。
J Am Diet Assoc. 2006 Sep;106(9):1412-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2006.06.006.
9
Fast food costs and adolescent body mass index: evidence from panel data.快餐成本与青少年体重指数:来自面板数据的证据。
J Health Econ. 2009 Sep;28(5):963-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2009.06.009. Epub 2009 Jun 21.
10
Sense of mastery and metabolic risk: moderating role of the local fast-food environment.掌控感与代谢风险:当地快餐环境的调节作用。
Psychosom Med. 2010 Apr;72(3):324-31. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e3181cdf439. Epub 2010 Jan 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Meaningfully reducing consumption of meat and animal products is an unsolved problem: A meta-analysis.切实减少肉类和动物产品的消费是一个尚未解决的问题:一项荟萃分析。
Appetite. 2025 Aug 5;216:108233. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2025.108233.
2
Meaningfully reducing consumption of meat and animal products is an unsolved problem: A meta-analysis.切实减少肉类和动物产品的消费是一个尚未解决的问题:一项荟萃分析。
Res Sq. 2025 Mar 19:rs.3.rs-5486065. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5486065/v1.
3
The effect of proportional pricing on alcohol purchasing in two online experiments.
两项在线实验中比例定价对酒精饮料购买行为的影响。
Addiction. 2025 May;120(5):860-870. doi: 10.1111/add.16723. Epub 2024 Dec 3.
4
How big is too big? A qualitative study of discretionary food portion size norms among Australian consumers.多大算大?澳大利亚消费者对随意食物份量规范的定性研究。
Public Health Nutr. 2024 Oct 24;27(1):e242. doi: 10.1017/S1368980024001964.
5
An exploration of customers' perceptions, preferences, experiences, and feasibility of offering standardized portions in restaurants.对顾客在餐厅提供标准化份量方面的认知、偏好、体验及可行性的探索。
Int J Gastron Food Sci. 2023 Dec;34. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgfs.2023.100829. Epub 2023 Oct 25.
6
The impact of calorie labelling and proportional pricing on out of home food orders: a randomised controlled trial study using a virtual food and drink delivery app.卡路里标签和按比例定价对非在家食品订单的影响:使用虚拟食品和饮料配送应用程序的随机对照试验研究。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2023 Sep 19;20(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12966-023-01513-2.
7
Understanding price incentives to upsize combination meals at large US fast-food restaurants.了解美国大型快餐店增加组合餐份量的价格激励措施。
Public Health Nutr. 2020 Feb;23(2):348-355. doi: 10.1017/S1368980019003410. Epub 2019 Dec 4.
8
Potential moderators of the portion size effect.部分大小效应的潜在调节因素。
Physiol Behav. 2019 May 15;204:191-198. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2019.02.043. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
9
Restructuring physical micro-environments to reduce the demand for meat: a systematic review and qualitative comparative analysis.重构物理微环境以减少对肉类的需求:系统评价和定性比较分析。
Lancet Planet Health. 2018 Sep;2(9):e384-e397. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(18)30188-8.
10
The effect of proportional v. value pricing on fountain drink purchases: results from a field experiment.比例定价对喷泉饮料购买量的影响:现场实验的结果。
Public Health Nutr. 2018 Sep;21(13):2518-2522. doi: 10.1017/S1368980018001143. Epub 2018 May 15.