Tanbo T, Abyholm T
National Hospital, University of Oslo, Norway.
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Oct;3(5):649-55.
Several aspects of reproductive technology are discussed. In tubal infertility, the choice between surgery or in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) is addressed. In cases with bilateral distal occlusion or otherwise bad prognosis, IVF is probably more successful and less expensive. IVF in unstimulated cycles has given promising results, with pregnancy rates comparable to the results from the National IVF-ET Registry. If these results can be confirmed by more studies they will probably have a great impact on the choice of treatment in tubal infertility. The results obtained with various transfer procedures in nontubal infertility have still to prove tubal transfer to be a more effective procedure than IVF. Finally, studies on microinsemination in male infertility or unexplained infertility with previous fertilization failure in IVF show promising results with the subzonal insemination and partial zona dissection procedures.
文中讨论了生殖技术的几个方面。对于输卵管性不孕,探讨了手术治疗或体外受精-胚胎移植(IVF-ET)之间的选择。对于双侧远端阻塞或预后不良的病例,IVF可能更成功且成本更低。未刺激周期的IVF已取得了令人鼓舞的结果,其妊娠率与国家IVF-ET登记处的结果相当。如果这些结果能得到更多研究的证实,它们可能会对输卵管性不孕的治疗选择产生重大影响。在非输卵管性不孕中,各种移植程序的结果仍有待证明输卵管移植比IVF更有效。最后,针对男性不育或IVF中既往受精失败的不明原因不孕的显微授精研究表明,透明带下授精和部分透明带切割程序取得了令人鼓舞的结果。