Panny M, Ammer K, Kundi M, Katzenschlager R, Hirschl M
Hanusch Hospital, Vienna, Austria.
Vasa. 2009 May;38(2):171-6. doi: 10.1024/0301-1526.38.2.171.
To investigate the relationship between the calf muscle pump and the clinical severity of chronic venous disorders (CVD) and of venous function parameters.
84 limbs in 44 patients underwent duplex scan and digital photoplethysmography (DPPG), the range of ankle movement was measured by digital goniometry and strength of calf muscles was determined by dynamometry. Limbs were allocated on the basis of clinical signs of CVD (according to the CEAP classification) into 4 groups: controls (no signs and symptoms of CVD): 34 limbs, C1/2: 24 limbs, C3/4: 16 limbs, C6: 10 limbs.
A higher degree in clinical severity of CVD was related to shorter venous refilltime (VRT) and lower venous pump power (VPP) measured by DPPG. The strength of dorsiflexion was significantly reduced in group C6 compared to controls. There was a positive correlation between measurements of DPPG and the strength of dorsiflexion and also with total strength (p < 0.05). In limbs with pathological reflux (> 1 s) the strength of dorsiflexion, range of ankle plantarflexion movement and total range of ankle movement were significantly reduced compared to those without pathological reflux (p < 0,05). Strength of plantarflexion was significantly reduced in group C1/2 compared to control group (p < 0,05).
Strength of dorsiflexion seems to be the main driving factor of normal venous flow and range of ankle movement is impaired in patients with pathological venous reflux. Further prospective studies should clarify if additional strengthening of ankle dorsiflexors should be included in well established venous training programs.
探讨小腿肌肉泵与慢性静脉疾病(CVD)临床严重程度及静脉功能参数之间的关系。
对44例患者的84条肢体进行了双功超声扫描和数字光电容积描记法(DPPG)检查,通过数字测角仪测量踝关节活动范围,用测力计测定小腿肌肉力量。根据CVD的临床体征(按照CEAP分类)将肢体分为4组:对照组(无CVD体征和症状):34条肢体,C1/2组:24条肢体,C3/4组:16条肢体,C6组:10条肢体。
CVD临床严重程度越高,DPPG测量的静脉再充盈时间(VRT)越短,静脉泵功率(VPP)越低。与对照组相比,C6组背屈力量明显降低。DPPG测量值与背屈力量及总力量之间存在正相关(p < 0.05)。与无病理性反流的肢体相比,病理性反流(> 1秒)的肢体背屈力量、踝关节跖屈活动范围和踝关节总活动范围明显减小(p < 0.05)。与对照组相比,C1/2组跖屈力量明显降低(p < 0.05)。
背屈力量似乎是正常静脉血流的主要驱动因素,病理性静脉反流患者的踝关节活动范围受损。进一步的前瞻性研究应明确在成熟的静脉训练方案中是否应增加踝关节背屈肌的强化训练。