Andersson Pål, Garnier-Laplace Jacqueline, Beresford Nicholas A, Copplestone David, Howard Brenda J, Howe Paul, Oughton Deborah, Whitehouse Paul
Swedish Radiation Safety Authority, 171 16 Stockholm, Sweden.
J Environ Radioact. 2009 Dec;100(12):1100-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2009.05.010. Epub 2009 Jul 8.
Criteria are needed to be able to judge the level of risk associated with dose rates estimated for non-human biota. In this paper, European guidance on the derivation of predicted no-effect chemical concentrations has been applied to appropriate radiation sensitivity data. A species sensitivity distribution fitted to the data for all species resulted in a generic predicted no-effect dose rate of 10 microGy h(-1).Currently, data are inadequate to derive screening values for separate organism groups. A second, higher, benchmark could aid in decision making by putting results into context on the scale of no effect to a risk of 'serious' effect. The need for, meaning and use of such a value needs to be debated by the wider community. This paper explores potential approaches of deriving scientific input to this debate. The concepts proposed in this paper are broadly consistent with the framework for human protection.
需要有标准来判断与非人类生物群估计剂量率相关的风险水平。在本文中,欧洲关于预测无效应化学浓度推导的指南已应用于适当的辐射敏感性数据。对所有物种的数据拟合得到的物种敏感性分布得出通用的预测无效应剂量率为10微戈瑞/小时。目前,尚无足够数据来推导各生物类群的筛选值。第二个更高的基准可以通过将结果放在从无效应到“严重”效应风险的尺度背景中来辅助决策。对于这样一个值的必要性、意义和用途需要更广泛的群体进行讨论。本文探讨了为这场讨论提供科学依据的潜在方法。本文提出的概念与人类保护框架大致一致。