Suppr超能文献

比较贝赫切特病患者随访中现有的疾病活动指数。

Comparison of existing disease activity indices in the follow-up of patients with Behçet's disease.

机构信息

Behçet's Disease Unit, Rheumatology Research Center, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Kargar Avenue, 14114, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Mod Rheumatol. 2009;19(5):536-41. doi: 10.1007/s10165-009-0191-z. Epub 2009 Jul 10.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the concordance between the Iranian Behçet's disease dynamic activity measure (IBDDAM) or the Behçet's disease current activity form (BDCAF) and expert physician global assessment (PGA) in the evaluation of disease activity changes in Behçet's disease (BD). In a prospective study, 117 consecutive patients with BD were evaluated in their two consecutive follow-up visits by IBDDAM and BDCAF. The change in disease activity was determined (increased, unchanged or decreased) according to the PGA. We used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to determine an appropriate cutoff point for disease activity change. Comparison was made by Stata and kappa analysis. Comparing the area under the ROC curve showed a significant difference between IBDDAM and BDCAF (p < 0.03). The difference was more significant between nonocular IBDDAM and BDCAF (p < 0.002). Better concordance was also observed for IBDDAM (nonocular and total) with PGA than BDCAF. The difference was not significant for ocular IBDDAM. The best cutoff point for nonocular IBDDAM was 0.45, for ocular IBDDAM was 3.5, and for BDCAF was 1 point. IBDDAM was the preferred method for the evaluation of disease activity change in patients with BD (without ocular involvement) considering a change of at least 0.45.

摘要

本研究旨在确定伊朗白塞病动态活动测量(IBDDAM)或白塞病当前活动表(BDCAF)与专家医生总体评估(PGA)在评估白塞病(BD)疾病活动变化方面的一致性。在一项前瞻性研究中,117 例连续 BD 患者在两次连续随访中通过 IBDDAM 和 BDCAF 进行评估。根据 PGA 确定疾病活动的变化(增加、不变或减少)。我们使用接收者操作特征(ROC)曲线来确定疾病活动变化的适当截断点。比较采用 Stata 和 Kappa 分析。比较 ROC 曲线下面积显示 IBDDAM 和 BDCAF 之间存在显著差异(p < 0.03)。非眼部 IBDDAM 和 BDCAF 之间的差异更为显著(p < 0.002)。与 BDCAF 相比,IBDDAM(非眼部和总)与 PGA 的一致性也更好。对于眼部 IBDDAM,差异不显著。非眼部 IBDDAM 的最佳截断点为 0.45,眼部 IBDDAM 的最佳截断点为 3.5,BDCAF 的最佳截断点为 1。考虑到至少 0.45 的变化,IBDDAM 是评估无眼部受累的 BD 患者疾病活动变化的首选方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验