• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹部包扎在非创伤性严重腹腔出血患者中的应用

[Application of abdominal packing in non-trauma patients with severe abdominal hemorrhage].

作者信息

Zhang Wen-Bo, Li Ning, Wang Ge-Fei, Li Jie-Shou

机构信息

Institute of General Surgery, Nanjing General Hospital of Nanjing Military Command, Nanjing 210002, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2009 Mar 15;47(6):441-5.

PMID:19595232
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and safety of damage control surgery with abdominal packing in non-trauma patients with severe abdominal hemorrhage.

METHODS

A retrospective review of consecutive non-trauma patients who underwent abdominal packing to control severe abdominal hemorrhage between February 2002 and February 2007 were performed. The demographics, physiological parameters, surgical indications and procedures, mortality, morbidity and volumes of resuscitation were retrieved. The observed mortality was compared to those calculated from the Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the Enumeration of Mortality and Morbidity (POSSUM) and Portsmouth Predictor Equation (P-POSSUM) scores.

RESULTS

A total of 26 non-trauma patients were included in this study, with a mean age of (42.6 +/- 15.8) years (range, 18 - 72 years). The most common etiologies associated with the severe hemorrhage was necrotizing pancreatitis (11 cases), intestinal fistula (5 cases) and tumor (4 cases). Of the patients, 24 cases (92.4%) achieved hemostasis by simple packing, 1 achieved hemostasis by using packing and angiographic embolization, and the other one failed and died. The mean intra-operative blood loss during the initial procedure was 1253.8 ml. The physiological parameters which improved significantly after rewarming and resuscitation in ICU phase included: body temperature, systolic blood pressure, heart rate, arterial pH, base excess, hemoglobin, hematocrit, prothrombin time, and international normalized ratio. The mean duration of packing was 4.3 days. The mean length of SICU stay and hospital stay was 40.5 and 67.4 days, respectively. Mortality rate predicted by POSSUM and P-POSSUM was 77.7% and 63.4%, respectively. Seven patients (26.9%) died after operation, brought an observed mortality rate significantly lower than predicted (P = 0.001 and 0.025, respectively). The most common complications included pneumonia (57.7%), bacteremia (50.0%), and re-bleeding (26.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

Damage control laparotomy with packing is an effective procedure in the management of severe non-trauma abdominal hemorrhage, it can prevent the aggravation of "lethal triad" characterized by hypothermia, coagulopathy and acidosis. Appropriate application of the technique in strictly selected patients can result in a lower mortality rate.

摘要

目的

评估腹部填塞损伤控制手术在非创伤性严重腹部出血患者中的疗效和安全性。

方法

对2002年2月至2007年2月间连续接受腹部填塞以控制严重腹部出血的非创伤性患者进行回顾性研究。收集患者的人口统计学资料、生理参数、手术指征和手术过程、死亡率、发病率及复苏量。将观察到的死亡率与根据生理和手术严重程度评分系统(POSSUM)及朴茨茅斯预测方程(P-POSSUM)评分计算出的死亡率进行比较。

结果

本研究共纳入26例非创伤性患者,平均年龄为(42.6±15.8)岁(范围18 - 72岁)。与严重出血相关的最常见病因是坏死性胰腺炎(11例)、肠瘘(5例)和肿瘤(4例)。其中,24例(92.4%)通过单纯填塞实现止血,1例通过填塞和血管造影栓塞实现止血,另1例失败死亡。初次手术期间的平均术中失血量为1253.8 ml。在重症监护病房(ICU)阶段复温和复苏后显著改善的生理参数包括:体温、收缩压、心率、动脉血pH值、碱剩余、血红蛋白、血细胞比容、凝血酶原时间和国际标准化比值。平均填塞时间为4.3天。外科重症监护病房(SICU)平均住院时间和总住院时间分别为40.5天和67.4天。POSSUM和P-POSSUM预测的死亡率分别为77.7%和63.4%。7例患者(26.9%)术后死亡,观察到的死亡率显著低于预测值(分别为P = 0.001和0.025)。最常见的并发症包括肺炎(57.7%)、菌血症(50.0%)和再次出血(26.9%)。

结论

腹部填塞损伤控制剖腹术是治疗严重非创伤性腹部出血的有效方法,可防止以体温过低、凝血功能障碍和酸中毒为特征的“致死三联征”加重。在严格选择的患者中适当应用该技术可降低死亡率。

相似文献

1
[Application of abdominal packing in non-trauma patients with severe abdominal hemorrhage].腹部包扎在非创伤性严重腹腔出血患者中的应用
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2009 Mar 15;47(6):441-5.
2
The concept of damage control: extending the paradigm to emergency general surgery.损伤控制的概念:将范式扩展至急诊普通外科。
Injury. 2008 Jan;39(1):93-101. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2007.06.011. Epub 2007 Sep 20.
3
[Damage control laparotomy in blunt abdominal injury].钝性腹部损伤的损伤控制剖腹术
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2009 Aug;76(4):310-3.
4
Damage control laparotomy.损伤控制剖腹术
Br J Surg. 2004 Jan;91(1):83-5. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4434.
5
Prognostic determinants in duodenal injuries.十二指肠损伤的预后决定因素。
Am Surg. 2004 Mar;70(3):248-55; discussion 255.
6
Hemostatic resuscitation during surgery improves survival in patients with traumatic-induced coagulopathy.手术期间的止血复苏可提高创伤性凝血病患者的生存率。
J Trauma. 2009 Jul;67(1):33-7; discussion 37-9. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31819adb8e.
7
Modified rapid deployment hemostat bandage reduces blood loss and mortality in coagulopathic pigs with severe liver injury.改良快速部署止血绷带可减少严重肝损伤凝血病猪的失血和死亡率。
J Trauma. 2003 Aug;55(2):275-80; discussion 280-1. doi: 10.1097/01.TA.0000079375.69610.89.
8
Predictors of outcome in patients requiring surgery for liver trauma.肝外伤手术患者预后的预测因素
Injury. 2007 Jan;38(1):65-70. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2006.08.064. Epub 2006 Nov 13.
9
Major hepatic necrosis: a common complication after angioembolization for treatment of high-grade liver injuries.大面积肝坏死:血管栓塞治疗重度肝损伤后的常见并发症。
J Trauma. 2009 Mar;66(3):621-7; discussion 627-9. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31819919f2.
10
Hemodynamically "stable" patients with peritonitis after penetrating abdominal trauma: identifying those who are bleeding.穿透性腹部创伤后血流动力学“稳定”的腹膜炎患者:识别那些正在出血的患者。
Arch Surg. 2005 Aug;140(8):767-72. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.140.8.767.