Teufel-Shone Nicolette I, Fitzgerald Carrie, Teufel-Shone Louis, Gamber Michelle
Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, P.O. Box 245209, University of Arizona, Tuscon, AZ 85724-5209, USA.
Am J Health Promot. 2009 Jul-Aug;23(6):S8-32. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.07053151.
To describe physical activity (PA) interventions implemented in American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) populations in the United States and Canada.
MEDLINE, PubMed, ERIC, and Sociological Abstracts were used to identify peer-reviewed journal articles. Dissertation abstracts, Web sites, and conference proceedings were searched to identify descriptions within the gray literature from 1986 to 2006.
The target population had to be described as AI/ AN, aboriginal, native Hawaiian, and/or native U.S. Samoan. PA interventions among indigenous populations of Latin America were not included.
Descriptions of 64 different AI/AN PA interventions (28 peer-reviewed journal articles and 36 in the gray literature) were identified.
Data were synthesized by geographic region, intervention strategy, target audience, activities, and sustainability.
Most interventions were conducted in the southwest United States (35.4%), in reservation communities (72%), and among participants 18 years and younger (57.8%). Forty-one percent of the 27 interventions with evaluation components reported significant changes in health, behavior, or knowledge.
Effective AI/AN PA interventions demonstrated impact on individual health and community resources. Program sustainability was linked to locally trained personnel, local leadership, and stable funding. Culturally acceptable and scientifically sound evaluation methods that can be implemented by local personnel are needed to assess the health and social impact of many long-running AI/AN PA interventions.
描述在美国和加拿大的美国印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民(AI/AN)群体中实施的体育活动(PA)干预措施。
使用MEDLINE、PubMed、教育资源信息中心(ERIC)和社会学文摘来识别同行评审的期刊文章。检索了学位论文摘要、网站和会议论文集,以识别1986年至2006年灰色文献中的描述。
目标人群必须被描述为AI/AN、原住民、夏威夷原住民和/或美属萨摩亚原住民。不包括拉丁美洲土著人口的PA干预措施。
识别出64种不同的AI/AN PA干预措施的描述(28篇同行评审的期刊文章和36篇灰色文献)。
按地理区域、干预策略、目标受众、活动和可持续性对数据进行综合。
大多数干预措施在美国西南部进行(35.4%),在保留地社区(72%),以及18岁及以下的参与者中(57.8%)。在27项有评估成分的干预措施中,41%报告了健康、行为或知识方面的显著变化。
有效的AI/AN PA干预措施对个人健康和社区资源产生了影响。项目的可持续性与当地培训的人员、当地领导和稳定的资金有关。需要有文化上可接受且科学合理的评估方法,以便由当地人员实施,来评估许多长期运行的AI/AN PA干预措施对健康和社会的影响。