Tory Regional Trauma Centre & Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, ON, Canada.
Injury. 2010 Jan;41(1):40-3. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2009.06.161.
Thoracic injuries are potentially responsible for 25% of all trauma deaths. Chest X-ray is commonly used to screen patients with chest injury. However, the use of computed tomography (CT) scan for primary screening is increasing, particularly for blunt trauma. CT scans are more sensitive than chest X-ray in detecting intra-thoracic abnormalities such as pneumothoraces and pneumomediastinums. Pneumomediastinum detected by chest X-ray or "overt pneumomediastinum", raises the concern of possible aerodigestive tract injuries. In contrast, there is scarce information on the clinical significance of pneumomediastinum diagnosed by CT scan only or "occult pneumomediastinum". Therefore we investigated the clinical consequences of occult pneumomediastinum in our blunt trauma population.
A 2-year retrospective chart review of all blunt chest trauma patients with initial chest CT scan admitted to a level I trauma centre. Data extracted from the medical records include; demographics, occult, overt, or no pneumomediastinum, the presence of intra-thoracic aerodigestive tract injuries (trachea, bronchus, and/or esophagus), mechanism and severity of injury, endotracheal intubation, chest thoracostomy, operations and radiological reports by an attending radiologist. All patients with intra-thoracic aerodigestive tract injuries from 1994 to 2004 were also investigated.
Of 897 patients who met the inclusion criteria 839 (93.5%) had no pneumomediastinum. Five patients (0.6%) had overt pneumomediastinum and 53 patients (5.9%) had occult pneumomediastinum. Patients with occult pneumomediastinum had significantly higher ISS and AIS chest (p<0.0001) than patients with no pneumomediastinum. A chest thoracostomy tube was more common (p<0.0001) in patients with occult pneumomediastinum (47.2%) than patients with no pneumomediastinum (10.4%), as well as occult pneumothorax. None of the patients with occult pneumomediastinum had aerodigestive tract injuries (95%CI 0-0.06). Follow up CT scan of patients with occult pneumomediastinum showed complete resolution in all cases, in average 3 h after the initial exam.
Occult pneumomediastinum occurred in approximately 6% of all trauma patients with blunt chest injuries in our institution. Patients who had occult pneumomediastinum were more severely injured than those who without. However, none of the patients with occult pneumomediastinum had aerodigestive tract injuries and follow up chest CT scans demonstrated their complete and spontaneous resolution.
胸部损伤可能导致 25%的所有创伤死亡。胸部 X 射线常用于筛查胸部损伤的患者。然而,CT 扫描用于初步筛查的使用越来越多,尤其是对于钝性创伤。CT 扫描在检测气胸和纵隔气肿等胸腔内异常方面比胸部 X 射线更敏感。胸部 X 射线检测到的纵隔气肿或“明显纵隔气肿”会引起对可能存在的呼吸道损伤的担忧。相比之下,对于仅通过 CT 扫描诊断的纵隔气肿或“隐匿性纵隔气肿”的临床意义知之甚少。因此,我们调查了隐匿性纵隔气肿在我们的钝性创伤人群中的临床后果。
对所有因钝性胸部创伤而接受初始胸部 CT 扫描并入住一级创伤中心的患者进行了为期 2 年的回顾性病历图表审查。从病历中提取的数据包括:人口统计学资料、隐匿性、明显性或无纵隔气肿、胸腔内呼吸道损伤(气管、支气管和/或食管)的存在、损伤机制和严重程度、气管插管、胸腔闭式引流、手术和由主治放射科医师出具的放射学报告。还对 1994 年至 2004 年间所有因胸腔内呼吸道损伤的患者进行了调查。
符合纳入标准的 897 例患者中,839 例(93.5%)无纵隔气肿。5 例(0.6%)有明显纵隔气肿,53 例(5.9%)有隐匿性纵隔气肿。隐匿性纵隔气肿患者的 ISS 和 AIS 胸部评分明显高于无纵隔气肿患者(p<0.0001)。隐匿性纵隔气肿患者的胸腔闭式引流管更常见(p<0.0001)(47.2%比无纵隔气肿患者的 10.4%),隐匿性气胸也更常见。隐匿性纵隔气肿患者无一例发生呼吸道损伤(95%CI 0-0.06)。隐匿性纵隔气肿患者的后续 CT 扫描显示所有病例均完全缓解,平均在初次检查后 3 小时。
在我们机构中,约 6%的钝性胸部创伤患者存在隐匿性纵隔气肿。隐匿性纵隔气肿患者的损伤程度比无纵隔气肿患者更严重。然而,隐匿性纵隔气肿患者无一例发生呼吸道损伤,随访胸部 CT 扫描显示其完全自发缓解。