Barakat Ruben, Ruiz Jonatan R, Stirling James R, Zakynthinaki María, Lucia Alejandro
Facultad de Ciencias de la Actividad Física y del Deporte-INEF, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Spain.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Dec;201(6):590.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.06.004. Epub 2009 Jul 15.
We examined the effect of light-intensity resistance exercise training that is performed during the second and third trimester of pregnancy by previously sedentary and healthy women on the type of delivery and on the dilation, expulsion, and childbirth time.
We randomly assigned 160 sedentary women to either a training (n=80) or a control (n=80) group. We recorded several maternal and newborn characteristics, the type of delivery (normal, instrumental, or cesarean), and dilation, expulsion, and childbirth time.
The percentage of women who had normal, instrumental, or cesarean delivery was similar in the training (70.8%, 13.9%, and 15.3%, respectively) and control (71.4%, 12.9%, and 15.7%, respectively) groups. The mean dilation, expulsion, and childbirth time did not differ between groups.
Light-intensity resistance training that is performed over the second and third trimester of pregnancy does not affect the type of delivery.
我们研究了怀孕中后期，由之前久坐不动的健康女性进行的低强度抗阻运动训练，对分娩类型、宫颈扩张、胎儿娩出及分娩时间的影响。
我们将160名久坐不动的女性随机分为训练组（n = 80）和对照组（n = 80）。我们记录了一些产妇和新生儿的特征、分娩类型（顺产、器械助产或剖宫产）以及宫颈扩张、胎儿娩出和分娩时间。
训练组（分别为70.8%、13.9%和15.3%）和对照组（分别为71.4%、12.9%和15.7%）中顺产、器械助产或剖宫产的女性比例相似。两组之间的平均宫颈扩张、胎儿娩出和分娩时间没有差异。
在怀孕中后期进行的低强度抗阻训练不会影响分娩类型。
