Muller Patrick Y, Dieterle Frank
Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Basel, Switzerland.
Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2009 Sep;5(9):1023-38. doi: 10.1517/17425250903114174.
Limited sensitivity and limited target organ specificity are the major drawbacks for most peripheral clinical pathology parameters traditionally used for monitoring organ integrity both during preclinical toxicological assessment and clinical safety testing of investigational drugs. Several novel toxicity biomarkers have emerged as sensitive tools for detection, monitoring, quantification and prediction of solid organ toxicity. These tissue-specific, non-invasive biomarkers may provide valuable information for decision making during toxicological assessment and may be used for sensitive and specific target organ monitoring during clinical trials. This review critically discusses the opportunities and limitations of these biomarkers with respect to their translation into (first-in-human) clinical trials. A comprehensive overview is provided on serum- and urine-based biomarkers for hepatotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, cardiotoxicity, gonadotoxicity, pancreatic toxicity, vascular toxicity and phospholipidosis including species-specific assay availabilities and sampling regimens. In addition, the current regulatory status is presented and discussed in view of recent changes in regulatory acceptance by health authorities.
在临床前毒理学评估和研究药物的临床安全性测试期间,传统上用于监测器官完整性的大多数外周临床病理学参数的主要缺点是敏感性有限和靶器官特异性有限。几种新型毒性生物标志物已成为检测、监测、量化和预测实体器官毒性的敏感工具。这些组织特异性、非侵入性生物标志物可为毒理学评估期间的决策提供有价值的信息,并可用于临床试验期间敏感且特异的靶器官监测。本综述批判性地讨论了这些生物标志物在转化为(首次人体)临床试验方面的机遇和局限性。本文全面概述了用于肝毒性、肾毒性、心脏毒性、性腺毒性、胰腺毒性、血管毒性和磷脂沉积症的基于血清和尿液的生物标志物,包括物种特异性检测方法的可用性和采样方案。此外,鉴于卫生当局在监管接受方面的最新变化,还介绍并讨论了当前的监管状况。