Huybrechts B, Bud M, Bergmans L, Lambrechts P, Jacobs R
BIOMAT Research Cluster, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Int Endod J. 2009 Aug;42(8):675-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01566.x.
To compare void detection in root fillings using different radiographic imaging techniques: intraoral analogue, intraoral digital and cone beam CT (CBCT) images and to assess factors influencing small void detection.
Two straight root canals in canine teeth were prepared. Calibrated steel wires of five different diameters (200, 300, 350, 500, 800 microm) were inserted respectively in the canal after the injection of a sealer. To simulate filling voids of known dimensions, the wires were removed after the sealer had set. Each sample was imaged, using a Minray X-ray tube (Soredex, Helsinki, Finland) at optimal clinical settings combined with Vistascan PSP (Dürr Dental, Bietigheim-Bissingen, Germany), Digora Optime PSP (Soredex), Sigma CCD (Instrumentarium, Tuusula, Finland) and E-speed films (Agfa-Gevaert, Mortsel, Belgium). The teeth were also imaged using CBCT (3D Accuitomo, Morita, Japan). A generalized mixed model and ANOVA analysis were used on the acquired data (Tukey-Kramer correction).
There was no evidence that the factor 'root level' affected void detection in root fillings. 'Void size' was a main determining factor as all voids larger than 300 microm were determined with all techniques. For the smaller voids, there were significant differences between the 5 imaging techniques at different void sizes and different root levels.
Void size and imaging technique were main determining factors. Voids larger than 300 mum were determined with all imaging techniques. For small void detection, all digital intraoral techniques performed better than intraoral analogue and CBCT images.
比较使用不同放射成像技术(口腔内模拟成像、口腔内数字成像和锥形束CT(CBCT)图像)检测根管充填物中的空洞,并评估影响小空洞检测的因素。
制备两颗犬齿的直根管。在注入封闭剂后,分别将五种不同直径(200、300、350、500、800微米)的校准钢丝插入根管。为模拟已知尺寸的充填空洞,封闭剂凝固后取出钢丝。每个样本使用Minray X射线管(芬兰赫尔辛基的Soredex公司)在最佳临床设置下结合Vistascan PSP(德国比廷根-比辛根的迪尔牙科公司)、Digora Optime PSP(Soredex公司)、Sigma CCD(芬兰图苏拉的Instrumentarium公司)和E速胶片(比利时莫特塞尔的爱克发-吉华公司)进行成像。这些牙齿还使用CBCT(日本森田公司的3D Accuitomo)进行成像。对获取的数据使用广义混合模型和方差分析(Tukey-Kramer校正)。
没有证据表明“牙根水平”因素会影响根管充填物中的空洞检测。“空洞大小”是一个主要决定因素,因为所有大于300微米的空洞都能通过所有技术检测到。对于较小的空洞,在不同空洞大小和不同牙根水平下,五种成像技术之间存在显著差异。
空洞大小和成像技术是主要决定因素。所有成像技术都能检测到大于300微米的空洞。对于小空洞检测,所有口腔内数字技术的表现均优于口腔内模拟成像和CBCT图像。