Hall S, Bornstein R A
Neuropsychology Laboratory, Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus.
Percept Mot Skills. 1991 Jun;72(3 Pt 2):1295-8. doi: 10.2466/pms.1991.72.3c.1295.
Serial-position effects were examined on a contextual memory task (paragraph recall) for patients with minor to mild closed-head injury and normal controls. Analysis indicated that at immediate recall, both normals and closed-head-injury patients have primacy and recency effects. With regard to total recall, however, the closed-head-injury patients remembered significantly fewer items than normal controls. The poorer performance of the minor to mild closed-head-injury group was not related to the duration from injury to neuropsychological evaluation and appears to be a lasting feature of memory performance following such injury. The pattern of serial-position effects was different between the groups. Normal controls showed slight recency and primacy effects and relatively better recall for the middle portions of the story, while patients with minor to mild closed-head injuries have prominent recency and primacy effects. Potential explanations for this pattern of performance are discussed.
对轻度至中度闭合性颅脑损伤患者和正常对照组进行了一项情境记忆任务(段落回忆)的系列位置效应研究。分析表明,在即时回忆时,正常人和闭合性颅脑损伤患者都有首因效应和近因效应。然而,就总回忆而言,闭合性颅脑损伤患者记住的项目明显少于正常对照组。轻度至中度闭合性颅脑损伤组较差的表现与受伤至神经心理学评估的时间间隔无关,似乎是此类损伤后记忆表现的一个持久特征。两组之间的系列位置效应模式不同。正常对照组表现出轻微的近因效应和首因效应,对故事中间部分的回忆相对较好,而轻度至中度闭合性颅脑损伤患者则有明显的近因效应和首因效应。文中讨论了这种表现模式的潜在解释。