• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中年退伍军人的数字广度年龄校正分数:与复杂视觉记忆测试失败相比,它与可靠数字广度的关联更紧密吗?

Digit span age scaled score in middle-aged military veterans: is it more closely associated with TOMM failure than reliable digit span?

作者信息

Whitney Kriscinda A, Davis Jeremy J, Shepard Polly H, Bertram David M, Adams Kenneth M

机构信息

Richard L. Roudebush Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.

出版信息

Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2009 May;24(3):263-72. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acp034. Epub 2009 Jul 18.

DOI:10.1093/arclin/acp034
PMID:19617596
Abstract

The relative usefulness of two digit span (DS) variables in detecting negative response bias, as defined by below cut-off performance on the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM), was examined among primarily middle-aged military veteran outpatients who were judged clinically to be at increased risk for displaying negative response bias on cognitive testing. Digit span variables included DS Age Scaled Score (DS Age SS) and Reliable DS. Findings from this retrospective data analysis (N = 46) suggest that DS Age SS is preferable for use over Reliable DS in predicting TOMM failure. Results of the current study suggest that, particularly if the Wechsler scales are an existing part of the neuropsychological assessment, examination of DS Age SS is an efficient means of detecting negative response bias.

摘要

在临床上被判定在认知测试中表现出消极反应偏差风险增加的主要为中年退伍军人门诊患者中,研究了两个数字广度(DS)变量在检测消极反应偏差方面的相对效用,消极反应偏差由低于记忆伪装测试(TOMM)临界表现来定义。数字广度变量包括DS年龄量表得分(DS Age SS)和可靠数字广度(Reliable DS)。这项回顾性数据分析(N = 46)的结果表明,在预测TOMM失败方面,DS年龄量表得分比可靠数字广度更适合使用。当前研究结果表明,特别是如果韦氏智力量表是神经心理学评估的现有组成部分,检查DS年龄量表得分是检测消极反应偏差的有效方法。

相似文献

1
Digit span age scaled score in middle-aged military veterans: is it more closely associated with TOMM failure than reliable digit span?中年退伍军人的数字广度年龄校正分数:与复杂视觉记忆测试失败相比,它与可靠数字广度的关联更紧密吗?
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2009 May;24(3):263-72. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acp034. Epub 2009 Jul 18.
2
WAIS-IV Digit Span variables: are they valuable for use in predicting TOMM and MSVT failure?韦氏成人智力量表第四版数字广度变量:它们在预测雷伊听觉词语学习测验和明尼苏达失语症甄别测验失败方面有价值吗?
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2013;20(2):83-94. doi: 10.1080/09084282.2012.670167. Epub 2012 Nov 8.
3
Utility of the response bias scale (RBS) and other MMPI-2 validity scales in predicting TOMM performance.反应偏差量表(RBS)及其他明尼苏达多相人格测验第二版(MMPI-2)效度量表在预测本顿视觉保持测验(TOMM)表现方面的效用。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2008 Nov-Dec;23(7-8):777-86. doi: 10.1016/j.acn.2008.09.001. Epub 2008 Oct 17.
4
WAIS digit span-based indicators of malingered neurocognitive dysfunction: classification accuracy in traumatic brain injury.基于韦氏成人智力量表数字广度的伪装神经认知功能障碍指标:创伤性脑损伤中的分类准确性
Assessment. 2005 Dec;12(4):429-44. doi: 10.1177/1073191105281099.
5
The value of the WISC-IV Digit Span subtest in detecting noncredible performance during pediatric neuropsychological examinations.WISC-IV 数字广度测验在检测儿童神经心理检查中非可信表现的价值。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2011 Aug;26(5):377-84. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acr040. Epub 2011 May 19.
6
Detecting malingering on the WAIS-III. Unusual Digit Span performance patterns in the normal population and in clinical groups.在韦氏成人智力量表第三版(WAIS-III)上检测诈病。正常人群和临床群体中异常的数字广度表现模式。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2003 Jan;18(1):1-9.
7
Expansion and re-examination of Digit Span effort indices on the WAIS-IV.WAIS-IV 数字广度努力指数的扩展与再检验。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2012;26(1):147-59. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2011.647083. Epub 2012 Jan 23.
8
Detecting incomplete effort with Digit Span from the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Third Edition.使用韦氏成人智力量表第三版中的数字广度测验来检测努力程度不足。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2006 Sep;20(3):513-23. doi: 10.1080/13854040590967117.
9
Use of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale Digit Span subtest for malingering detection: a meta-analytic review.韦氏成人智力量表数字广度分测验在测谎中的应用:一项荟萃分析综述。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2011 Mar;33(3):300-14. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2010.516743.
10
Examining unusual digit span performance in a population of postsecondary students assessed for academic difficulties.考察在评估学业困难的大学生群体中出现的不寻常数字跨度表现。
Assessment. 2010 Sep;17(3):283-93. doi: 10.1177/1073191109348590. Epub 2009 Nov 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Multivariate Models of Performance Validity: The Erdodi Index Captures the Dual Nature of Non-Credible Responding (Continuous and Categorical).多元表现效度模型:埃尔多迪指数捕捉到不可信反应的双重性质(连续和分类)。
Assessment. 2023 Jul;30(5):1467-1485. doi: 10.1177/10731911221101910. Epub 2022 Jun 25.
2
Flipping the Script: Measuring Both Performance Validity and Cognitive Ability with the Forced Choice Recognition Trial of the RCFT.翻转脚本:使用 RCFT 的迫选识别试验同时测量绩效有效性和认知能力。
Percept Mot Skills. 2021 Aug;128(4):1373-1408. doi: 10.1177/00315125211019704. Epub 2021 May 22.
3
The Effects of Repeated Testing, Simulated Malingering, and Traumatic Brain Injury on High-Precision Measures of Simple Visual Reaction Time.
重复测试、模拟诈病和创伤性脑损伤对简单视觉反应时间高精度测量的影响。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Nov 9;9:540. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00540. eCollection 2015.