• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

外科医生中的锐器伤报告

Sharps injury reporting amongst surgeons.

作者信息

Kerr Hui-Ling, Stewart Nicola, Pace Alistair, Elsayed Sherief

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, King's Mill Hospital, Nottinghamshire, UK.

出版信息

Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2009 Jul;91(5):430-2. doi: 10.1308/003588409X432194.

DOI:10.1308/003588409X432194
PMID:19622260
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2758447/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to evaluate the level of sharps injury reporting amongst surgeons.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

A total of 164 surgeons completed a questionnaire on the reporting of sharps injuries, on the reasons for not reporting and their practise of universal precautions.

RESULTS

Out of 164 surgeons, only 25.8% had reported all their injuries, 22.5% had reported some and 51.7% had reported none. The top three reasons for not reporting their injuries included perception of low risk of transmission, not being concerned and no time. Of the respondents, 15.9% practised all three universal precautions of double-gloving, face shields and hands-free technique.

CONCLUSIONS

We showed that despite local trust adherence to Department of Health policy, sharps injury reporting rates are inadequate. Further investment into healthcare worker education as well as a facilitation of the process of reporting may be necessary to improve reporting rates.

摘要

引言

本研究的目的是评估外科医生锐器伤报告的水平。

对象与方法

共有164名外科医生完成了一份关于锐器伤报告、未报告原因及通用防护措施实践情况的问卷。

结果

在164名外科医生中,仅25.8%报告了所有损伤,22.5%报告了部分损伤,51.7%未报告任何损伤。未报告损伤的三大主要原因包括认为传播风险低、不担心和没时间。在受访者中,15.9%实施了双层手套、面罩和免提技术这三项通用防护措施。

结论

我们发现,尽管当地医疗机构遵守了卫生部的政策,但锐器伤报告率仍不足。可能需要进一步投入资源开展医护人员教育,并简化报告流程,以提高报告率。

相似文献

1
Sharps injury reporting amongst surgeons.外科医生中的锐器伤报告
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2009 Jul;91(5):430-2. doi: 10.1308/003588409X432194.
2
The incidence and reporting rates of needle-stick injury amongst UK surgeons.英国外科医生中针刺伤的发生率及报告率。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2009 Jan;91(1):12-7. doi: 10.1308/003588409X359213. Epub 2008 Nov 4.
3
Incidence and reporting of sharps injuries amongst ENT surgeons.耳鼻喉科外科医生锐器伤的发生率及报告情况。
J Laryngol Otol. 2016 Jun;130(6):581-6. doi: 10.1017/S0022215116000724. Epub 2016 Feb 29.
4
Barriers to the reporting and management of needlestick injuries among surgeons.外科医生报告和处理针刺伤的障碍。
Ir J Med Sci. 2009 Sep;178(3):297-9. doi: 10.1007/s11845-009-0359-8. Epub 2009 Jun 4.
5
The reporting of needlestick injuries sustained in theatre by surgeons: are we under-reporting?外科医生在手术室发生针刺伤的报告情况:我们是否报告不足?
J Hosp Infect. 2008 Sep;70(1):66-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2008.04.025. Epub 2008 Jul 3.
6
Needlestick injuries during surgical procedures: a multidisciplinary online study.手术过程中的针刺伤:一项多学科在线研究。
Occup Med (Lond). 2010 Mar;60(2):139-44. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqp175. Epub 2010 Jan 11.
7
Needlestick and sharps injuries among nursing students.护理专业学生的针刺伤和锐器伤
J Adv Nurs. 2005 Sep;51(5):449-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03526.x.
8
A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Sharps Injuries Among Dermatologic Surgeons: A Survey of American College of Mohs Surgery Members.皮肤科医师锐器伤的横断面分析:美国Mohs 外科学会会员调查。
Dermatol Surg. 2023 Nov 1;49(11):985-988. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000003907. Epub 2023 Aug 28.
9
Sharps injuries and reporting practices of U.S. dermatologists.美国皮肤科医生的锐器伤和报告操作。
Dermatol Surg. 2013 Dec;39(12):1813-21. doi: 10.1111/dsu.12352. Epub 2013 Nov 14.
10
Needlestick and sharps injuries among nurses in the healthcare sector in a city of western Turkey.土耳其西部某城市医疗保健部门护士的针刺伤和锐器伤情况。
J Hosp Infect. 2004 Nov;58(3):216-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2004.06.029.

引用本文的文献

1
Occupational Injuries and Their Determinants Among Healthcare Workers in Western Countries: A Scoping Review.西方国家医护人员的职业伤害及其决定因素:一项范围综述
Med Lav. 2025 Feb 21;116(1):16664. doi: 10.23749/mdl.v116i1.16664.
2
Occupational exposure to blood and body fluids among primary healthcare workers in Johannesburg health district: High rate of underreporting.约翰内斯堡卫生区初级保健工作者职业暴露于血液和体液:漏报率高。
S Afr Fam Pract (2004). 2020 May 14;62(1):e1-e7. doi: 10.4102/safp.v62i1.5027.
3
Cross-sectional survey of a sample of UK primary care dental professionals' experiences of sharps injuries and perception of access to occupational health support.对英国基层医疗牙科专业人员锐器伤经历及职业健康支持获取认知样本的横断面调查。
Br Dent J. 2018 Nov 30. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2018.1031.
4
Compliance with occupational exposure risk management procedures in a dental school setting.牙科学校环境中职业暴露风险管理程序的合规情况。
Br Dent J. 2017 Jun 9;222(11):859-863. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2017.498.
5
Prevalence of blood-borne viral infections among autopsy cases in Jordan.约旦尸检病例中血源病毒感染的患病率。
Qatar Med J. 2017 Apr 21;2016(2):14. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2016.14. eCollection 2016.
6
Occupational health related concerns among surgeons.外科医生中与职业健康相关的问题。
Int J Health Sci (Qassim). 2016 Apr;10(2):279-91.
7
Sharps injuries in the operating room.手术室中的锐器伤
Environ Health Prev Med. 2014 Sep;19(5):348-53. doi: 10.1007/s12199-014-0401-y. Epub 2014 Aug 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Needlestick injuries among surgeons in training.外科住院医师的针刺伤
N Engl J Med. 2007 Jun 28;356(26):2693-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa070378.
2
Strategies for preventing sharps injuries in the operating room.手术室预防锐器伤的策略。
Surg Clin North Am. 2005 Dec;85(6):1299-305, xiii. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2005.09.012.
3
Monitoring sharps injuries: EPINet surveillance results.锐器伤监测:EPINet监测结果
Nurs Stand. 2004;19(3):33-8. doi: 10.7748/ns2004.09.19.3.33.c3701.
4
Needle-stick injuries in the National Health Service: a culture of silence.国民医疗服务体系中的针刺伤:沉默文化
J R Soc Med. 2004 Jul;97(7):326-7. doi: 10.1177/014107680409700705.
5
A review of sharps injuries and preventative strategies.锐器伤及其预防策略综述。
J Hosp Infect. 2003 Apr;53(4):237-42. doi: 10.1053/jhin.2002.1378.
6
Effectiveness of the hands-free technique in reducing operating theatre injuries.免提技术在减少手术室损伤方面的有效性。
Occup Environ Med. 2002 Oct;59(10):703-7. doi: 10.1136/oem.59.10.703.
7
How often does glove perforation occur in surgery? Comparison between single gloves and a double-gloving system.手术中手套穿孔的频率有多高?单手套与双层手套系统的比较。
Am J Surg. 2001 Jun;181(6):564-6. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(01)00626-2.
8
Intraoperative glove perforation--single versus double gloving in protection against skin contamination.术中手套穿孔——单层手套与双层手套预防皮肤污染的比较
Postgrad Med J. 2001 Jul;77(909):458-60. doi: 10.1136/pmj.77.909.458.
9
A survey of percutaneous/mucocutaneous injury reporting in a public teaching hospital.一家公立教学医院的经皮/黏膜皮肤损伤报告调查。
J Hosp Infect. 1999 Feb;41(2):151-4. doi: 10.1016/s0195-6701(99)90053-1.
10
Double gloving and surgical technique.双层手套与手术技术。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1993 Jul;75(4):291-2.