• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用质量改进技术加强患者对诊断和管理的教育与咨询。

Using quality-improvement techniques to enhance patient education and counselling of diagnosis and management.

作者信息

Varkey Prathibha, Sathananthan Airani, Scheifer Amanda, Bhagra Sumit, Fujiyoshi Akira, Tom Andrea, Murad Mohammad Hassan

机构信息

Division of Preventive and Occupational Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA.

出版信息

Qual Prim Care. 2009;17(3):205-13.

PMID:19622271
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients recall less than half the information provided to them by their physicians.

AIMS

The aim of this study was to use quality-improvement (QI) techniques to enhance patient understanding of diagnosis, management and follow-up at the end of the office visit.

METHOD

QI techniques including stakeholder analysis, process mapping and plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycles were used in a pilot study in an outpatient endocrinology clinic specialising in bone disease. The impact of these interventions was evaluated by pre- and post-intervention patient surveys that included qualitative and quantitative data.

RESULTS

A team of endocrinology fellows and faculty with expertise in QI developed a series of tools to encourage conversation and interaction during the encounter and to serve as a reference for patients to take home through five PDSA cycles. The tools were iterations of written materials provided to patients at the end of the clinical encounter. In each cycle, the tools were modified according to feedback from patients and providers. Ninety-three patients participated in this study. Patients were surveyed after the implementation of two of the five cycles. Compared with pre-intervention, modifications during the two cycles were associated with a non-significant increase in patients' understanding of the reasons for testing (from 64% to 80% and 75%); management plan (from 61% to 86% and 79%); and future follow-up plans (from 64% to 86% and 81%); P > 0.05 for all three outcomes. Improvement was not seen in patients' knowledge of their diagnoses (from 74% to 73% and 70%; P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

This pilot study shows how QI tools can be used for creating and initiating system improvements aimed at enhancing patient education and counselling.

摘要

背景

患者对医生提供给他们的信息的回忆不到一半。

目的

本研究的目的是使用质量改进(QI)技术,以提高患者在门诊结束时对诊断、管理和随访的理解。

方法

在一家专门治疗骨病的门诊内分泌诊所进行的一项试点研究中,使用了包括利益相关者分析、流程映射和计划-实施-研究-改进(PDSA)循环在内的QI技术。通过干预前后的患者调查评估这些干预措施的影响,该调查包括定性和定量数据。

结果

一组具有QI专业知识的内分泌科住院医师和教员开发了一系列工具,以鼓励在诊疗过程中的对话和互动,并作为患者带回家的参考资料,通过五个PDSA循环进行完善。这些工具是在临床诊疗结束时提供给患者的书面材料的迭代版本。在每个循环中,根据患者和提供者的反馈对工具进行修改。93名患者参与了本研究。在五个循环中的两个循环实施后对患者进行了调查。与干预前相比,两个循环中的修改与患者对检查原因的理解(从64%提高到80%和75%)、管理计划(从61%提高到86%和79%)以及未来随访计划(从64%提高到86%和81%)的非显著增加相关;所有三个结果的P>0.05。患者对其诊断的了解没有改善(从74%降至73%和70%;P>0.05)。

结论

这项试点研究展示了如何使用QI工具来创建和启动旨在加强患者教育和咨询的系统改进。

相似文献

1
Using quality-improvement techniques to enhance patient education and counselling of diagnosis and management.运用质量改进技术加强患者对诊断和管理的教育与咨询。
Qual Prim Care. 2009;17(3):205-13.
2
Stop the pain! A nation-wide quality improvement programme in paediatric oncology pain control.止住疼痛!一项全国性的儿童肿瘤疼痛控制质量改进计划。
Eur J Pain. 2008 Oct;12(7):819-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2007.12.002. Epub 2008 Jan 25.
3
Illinois medical home project: pilot intervention and evaluation.伊利诺伊州医疗之家项目:试点干预与评估
Am J Med Qual. 2009 Jul-Aug;24(4):302-9. doi: 10.1177/1062860609335759. Epub 2009 Jun 10.
4
Teaching quality improvement: a collaboration project between medicine and engineering.教学质量提升:医学与工程学之间的合作项目
Am J Med Qual. 2008 Jul-Aug;23(4):296-301. doi: 10.1177/1062860608317764.
5
A descriptive study of educational outreach to promote use of quality improvement tools in primary care private practice.一项关于开展教育推广以促进在初级保健私人诊所使用质量改进工具的描述性研究。
Am J Med Qual. 2009 Mar-Apr;24(2):90-8. doi: 10.1177/1062860608329797. Epub 2009 Jan 30.
6
Impact of patient care appraisal on physician behaviour in the office setting.患者护理评估对门诊环境中医师行为的影响。
Can Med Assoc J. 1985 May 1;132(9):1025-9.
7
Taking a unified approach to teaching and implementing quality improvements across multiple residency programs: the Atlantic Health experience.在多个住院医师培训项目中采用统一的教学方法并实施质量改进:大西洋健康系统的经验。
Acad Med. 2009 Dec;84(12):1788-95. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181bf5b46.
8
Implementation of a diabetes clinic-in-a-clinic project in a family practice setting: using the plan, do, study, act model.在家庭医疗环境中实施糖尿病“诊所中的诊所”项目:运用计划、执行、研究、行动模型
J Clin Nurs. 2009 Jul;18(14):2096-103. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02774.x.
9
[Short intervention in patients with alcohol problems--counseling materials developed by the German Federal Medical Council and the German Federal Center for Health Education].[针对酒精问题患者的短期干预——德国联邦医学委员会和德国联邦健康教育中心编写的咨询材料]
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2002 Jun;96(5):287-94.
10
Quality assurance instrument focusing on patient counseling.注重患者咨询的质量保证工具。
Ann Pharmacother. 2005 Jul-Aug;39(7-8):1220-6. doi: 10.1345/aph.1E629. Epub 2005 Jun 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the Accuracy of ChatGPT in Appropriately Triaging Common Postoperative Concerns Regarding Mohs Micrographic Surgery.评估ChatGPT对Mohs显微外科手术常见术后问题进行合理分诊的准确性。
JMIR Dermatol. 2025 Jul 8;8:e72706. doi: 10.2196/72706.
2
Embracing Digital: The Transition to Electronic Patient Health Education.拥抱数字化:向电子患者健康教育的转变。
Indian J Plast Surg. 2024 Sep 3;57(5):408-409. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1790201. eCollection 2024 Oct.
3
Empowering Patients: Promoting Patient Education and Health Literacy.
赋予患者权力:促进患者教育与健康素养。
Cureus. 2022 Jul 27;14(7):e27336. doi: 10.7759/cureus.27336. eCollection 2022 Jul.
4
Modernizing the Mohs Surgery Consultation: Instituting a Video Module for Improved Patient Education and Satisfaction.现代化莫氏手术咨询:引入视频模块以提高患者教育水平和满意度。
Dermatol Surg. 2018 Jun;44(6):778-784. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000001473.
5
Systematic review of the application of the plan-do-study-act method to improve quality in healthcare.应用计划-执行-研究-行动方法改善医疗保健质量的系统评价。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Apr;23(4):290-8. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-001862. Epub 2013 Sep 11.