Zahar Jean-Ralph, Nguile-Makao Moliere, Français Adrien, Schwebel Carole, Garrouste-Orgeas Maité, Goldgran-Toledano Dany, Azoulay Elie, Thuong Marie, Jamali Samir, Cohen Yves, de Lassence Arnaud, Timsit Jean-François
Microbiology and Infection Control Unit (J-RZ), Necker Teaching Hospital, Paris France.
Crit Care Med. 2009 Sep;37(9):2545-51. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181a38109.
: To build and validate a ventilator-associated pneumonia risk score for benchmarking. The rate of ventilator-associated pneumonia varies widely with case-mix, a fact that has limited its use for measuring intensive care unit performance.
: We studied 1856 patients in the OUTCOMEREA database treated at intensive care unit admission by endotracheal intubation followed by mechanical ventilation for >48 hrs; they were allocated randomly to a training data set (n = 1233) or a validation data set (n = 623). Multivariate logistic regression was used. Calibration of the final model was assessed in both data sets, using the Hosmer-Lemeshow chi-square test and receiver operating characteristic curves.
: Independent risk factors for ventilator-associated pneumonia were male gender (odds ratio = 1.97, 95% confidence interval = 1.32-2.95); SOFA at intensive care unit admission (<3 [reference value], 3-4 [2.57, 1.39-4.77], 5-8 [7.37, 4.24-12.81], >8 [5.81 (3.2-10.52)], no use within 48 hrs after intensive care unit admission of parenteral nutrition (2.29, 1.52-3.45), no broad-spectrum antimicrobials (2.11, 1.46-3.06); and mechanical ventilation duration (<5 days (); 5-7 days (17.55, 4.01-76.85); 7-15 days (53.01, 12.74-220.56); >15 days (225.6, 54.3-936.7). Tests in the training set showed good calibration and good discrimination (area under the curve-receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.881), and both criteria remained good in the validation set (area under the curve-receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.848) and good calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow chi-square = 9.98, p = .5). Observed ventilator-associated pneumonia rates varied across intensive care units from 9.7 to 26.1 of 1000 mechanical ventilation days but the ratio of observed over theoretical ventilator-associated pneumonia rates was >1 in only two intensive care units.
: The ventilator-associated pneumonia rate may be useful for benchmarking provided the ratio of observed over theoretical rates is used. External validation of our prediction score is needed.
构建并验证用于基准比较的呼吸机相关性肺炎风险评分。呼吸机相关性肺炎的发生率因病例组合差异很大,这一事实限制了其在衡量重症监护病房绩效方面的应用。
我们研究了OUTCOMEREA数据库中1856例在重症监护病房入院时接受气管插管并随后机械通气超过48小时的患者;他们被随机分配到训练数据集(n = 1233)或验证数据集(n = 623)。使用多变量逻辑回归。在两个数据集中使用Hosmer-Lemeshow卡方检验和受试者工作特征曲线评估最终模型的校准情况。
呼吸机相关性肺炎的独立危险因素包括男性(比值比 = 1.97,95%置信区间 = 1.32 - 2.95);重症监护病房入院时的序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分(<3[参考值],3 - 4[2.57,1.39 - 4.77],5 - 8[7.37,4.24 - 12.81],>8[5.81(3.2 - 10.52)]),重症监护病房入院后48小时内未使用肠外营养(2.29,1.52 - 3.45),未使用广谱抗菌药物(2.11,1.46 - 3.06);以及机械通气持续时间(<5天();5 - 7天(17.55,4.01 - 76.85);7 - 15天(53.01,12.74 - 220.56);>15天(225.6,54.3 - 936.7)。训练集中的测试显示校准良好且区分度良好(曲线下面积 - 受试者工作特征曲线 = 0.881),验证集中这两个标准也保持良好(曲线下面积 - 受试者工作特征曲线 = 0.848)且校准良好(Hosmer-Lemeshow卡方 = 9.98,p = 0.5)。各重症监护病房观察到的呼吸机相关性肺炎发生率在每1000机械通气日9.7至26.1之间,但观察到的与理论上的呼吸机相关性肺炎发生率之比仅在两个重症监护病房大于1。
如果使用观察到的与理论发生率之比,呼吸机相关性肺炎发生率可能有助于进行基准比较。需要对我们的预测评分进行外部验证。