• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《HEALTHY 研究中过程评估的原理、设计和方法》

Rationale, design and methods for process evaluation in the HEALTHY study.

机构信息

Department of Planning, Policy and Design, University of California at Irvine, Irvine CA 92697, USA.

出版信息

Int J Obes (Lond). 2009 Aug;33 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S60-7. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2009.118.

DOI:10.1038/ijo.2009.118
PMID:19623191
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2749285/
Abstract

The HEALTHY study was a multi-site randomized trial designed to determine whether a 3-year school-based intervention targeting nutrition and physical activity behaviors could effectively reduce risk factors associated with type 2 diabetes in middle school children. Pilot and formative studies were conducted to inform the development of the intervention components and the process evaluation methods for the main trial. During the main trial, both qualitative and quantitative assessments monitored the fidelity of the intervention and motivated modifications to improve intervention delivery. Structured observations of physical education classes, total school food environments, classroom-based educational modules, and communications and promotional campaigns provided verification that the intervention was delivered as intended. Interviews and focus groups yielded a multidimensional assessment of how the intervention was delivered and received, as well as identifying the barriers to and facilitators of the intervention across and within participating schools. Interim summaries of process evaluation data were presented to the study group as a means of ensuring standardization and quality of the intervention across the seven participating centers. Process evaluation methods and procedures documented the fidelity with which the HEALTHY study was implemented across 21 intervention schools and identified ways in which the intervention delivery might be enhanced throughout the study.

摘要

HEALTHY 研究是一项多中心随机试验,旨在确定针对营养和身体活动行为的为期 3 年的学校干预措施是否可以有效降低中学生 2 型糖尿病相关的风险因素。进行了试点和形成性研究,为干预措施的制定和主要试验的过程评估方法提供信息。在主要试验期间,定性和定量评估监测了干预措施的保真度,并促使进行了改进,以提高干预措施的实施效果。对体育课、学校整体食物环境、课堂教育模块、以及交流和宣传活动进行了结构化观察,从而验证了干预措施的实施符合预期。访谈和焦点小组提供了对干预措施的实施和接受情况的多维评估,同时确定了在参与学校之间和内部实施干预措施的障碍和促进因素。向研究小组提交了过程评估数据的中期总结,作为确保七个参与中心的干预措施标准化和质量的一种手段。过程评估方法和程序记录了 HEALTHY 研究在 21 所干预学校中的实施保真度,并确定了在整个研究过程中可以改进干预措施实施的方式。

相似文献

1
Rationale, design and methods for process evaluation in the HEALTHY study.《HEALTHY 研究中过程评估的原理、设计和方法》
Int J Obes (Lond). 2009 Aug;33 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S60-7. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2009.118.
2
Rationale, design and methods of the HEALTHY study behavior intervention component.HEALTHY 研究行为干预部分的原理、设计和方法。
Int J Obes (Lond). 2009 Aug;33 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S44-51. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2009.116.
3
Rationale, design and methods of the HEALTHY study physical education intervention component.“HEALTHY 研究体育干预部分的原理、设计和方法。”
Int J Obes (Lond). 2009 Aug;33 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S37-43. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2009.115.
4
Social marketing-based communications to integrate and support the HEALTHY study intervention.基于社会营销的传播来整合和支持 HEALTHY 研究干预。
Int J Obes (Lond). 2009 Aug;33 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S52-9. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2009.117.
5
HEALTHY study rationale, design and methods: moderating risk of type 2 diabetes in multi-ethnic middle school students.健康研究的基本原理、设计和方法:降低多民族中学生 2 型糖尿病风险。
Int J Obes (Lond). 2009 Aug;33 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S4-20. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2009.112.
6
Rationale, design and methods of the HEALTHY study nutrition intervention component.HEALTHY 研究营养干预部分的原理、设计和方法。
Int J Obes (Lond). 2009 Aug;33 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S29-36. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2009.114.
7
Interactive learning activities for the middle school classroom to promote healthy energy balance and decrease diabetes risk in the HEALTHY primary prevention trial.在“健康”初级预防试验中,为中学课堂设计的互动学习活动,以促进健康的能量平衡并降低糖尿病风险。
Health Promot Pract. 2014 Jan;15(1):55-62. doi: 10.1177/1524839912469377. Epub 2012 Dec 27.
8
Process evaluation results from the HEALTHY physical education intervention.健康体育干预的过程评估结果。
Health Educ Res. 2012 Apr;27(2):307-18. doi: 10.1093/her/cyr107. Epub 2011 Dec 8.
9
School-based intervention that integrates nutrition education and supportive healthy school food environment among Malaysian primary school children: a study protocol.马来西亚小学生营养教育与支持健康学校食物环境相结合的学校干预措施:研究方案。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Oct 30;19(1):1427. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7708-y.
10
Student public commitment in a school-based diabetes prevention project: impact on physical health and health behavior.基于学校的糖尿病预防项目中的学生公众承诺:对身体健康和健康行为的影响。
BMC Public Health. 2011 Sep 20;11:711. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-711.

引用本文的文献

1
Methodology for evaluation of complex school-based health promotion interventions.基于学校的复杂健康促进干预措施的评估方法
J Public Health Policy. 2024 Dec;45(4):623-638. doi: 10.1057/s41271-024-00510-4. Epub 2024 Aug 12.
2
Adding a Brief Continuous Glucose Monitoring Intervention to the National Diabetes Prevention Program: A Multimethod Feasibility Study.将简短连续血糖监测干预措施添加到国家糖尿病预防计划中:一项多方法可行性研究。
J Diabetes Res. 2024 May 16;2024:7687694. doi: 10.1155/2024/7687694. eCollection 2024.
3
Interventions to prevent obesity in children aged 5 to 11 years old.预防 5 至 11 岁儿童肥胖的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 May 20;5(5):CD015328. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015328.pub2.
4
"With group antenatal care, pregnant women know they are not alone": The process evaluation of a group antenatal care intervention in Ghana.“有了小组产前保健,孕妇知道她们并不孤单”:加纳小组产前保健干预的过程评估。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 7;18(11):e0291855. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291855. eCollection 2023.
5
Feasibility of a food-based diabetes self-management education intervention for food insecure patients with type 2 diabetes: a convergent mixed methods study.基于食物的 2 型糖尿病患者食物不安全的自我管理教育干预的可行性:一项汇聚性混合方法研究。
Public Health Nutr. 2023 Dec;26(12):3100-3111. doi: 10.1017/S1368980023002082. Epub 2023 Sep 28.
6
Health equity in action: using community-engaged research to update an intervention promoting a healthy home food environment to Black/African American families.行动中的健康公平:利用社区参与式研究更新干预措施,以促进黑人和非裔美国家庭的健康家庭食品环境。
Cancer Causes Control. 2024 Feb;35(2):311-321. doi: 10.1007/s10552-023-01753-4. Epub 2023 Sep 22.
7
Process Evaluation of FoodMASTER Middle Grades: An Integrative Approach to Nutrition Education in the Science Classroom.《FoodMASTER初中课程的过程评估:科学课堂中营养教育的综合方法》
Health Behav Policy Rev. 2017 Sep;4(5):491-502. doi: 10.14485/hbpr.4.5.9.
8
Process evaluation of enhancing primary health care for non-communicable disease management in Malaysia: Uncovering the fidelity & feasibility elements.马来西亚增强初级卫生保健以进行非传染性疾病管理的过程评估:揭示忠实度和可行性要素。
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 11;16(1):e0245125. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245125. eCollection 2021.
9
Using Relational Agents to Promote Family Communication Around Type 1 Diabetes Self-Management in the Diabetes Family Teamwork Online Intervention: Longitudinal Pilot Study.在糖尿病家庭团队在线干预中使用关系代理促进1型糖尿病自我管理方面的家庭沟通:纵向试点研究
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Sep 13;21(9):e15318. doi: 10.2196/15318.
10
Implementing an arts-based intervention for patients with end-stage kidney disease whilst receiving haemodialysis: a feasibility study protocol.对接受血液透析的终末期肾病患者实施基于艺术的干预措施:一项可行性研究方案
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2019 Jan 5;5:1. doi: 10.1186/s40814-018-0389-y. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
Social marketing-based communications to integrate and support the HEALTHY study intervention.基于社会营销的传播来整合和支持 HEALTHY 研究干预。
Int J Obes (Lond). 2009 Aug;33 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S52-9. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2009.117.
2
Rationale, design and methods of the HEALTHY study behavior intervention component.HEALTHY 研究行为干预部分的原理、设计和方法。
Int J Obes (Lond). 2009 Aug;33 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S44-51. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2009.116.
3
HEALTHY study rationale, design and methods: moderating risk of type 2 diabetes in multi-ethnic middle school students.健康研究的基本原理、设计和方法:降低多民族中学生 2 型糖尿病风险。
Int J Obes (Lond). 2009 Aug;33 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S4-20. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2009.112.
4
Rationale, design and methods of the HEALTHY study physical education intervention component.“HEALTHY 研究体育干预部分的原理、设计和方法。”
Int J Obes (Lond). 2009 Aug;33 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S37-43. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2009.115.
5
Rationale, design and methods of the HEALTHY study nutrition intervention component.HEALTHY 研究营养干预部分的原理、设计和方法。
Int J Obes (Lond). 2009 Aug;33 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S29-36. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2009.114.
6
The quality of qualitative research.定性研究的质量
Am J Med Qual. 2008 Sep-Oct;23(5):389-95. doi: 10.1177/1062860608320646.
7
Systematic review of school-based interventions that focus on changing dietary intake and physical activity levels to prevent childhood obesity: an update to the obesity guidance produced by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.对旨在通过改变饮食摄入和身体活动水平来预防儿童肥胖的学校干预措施的系统评价:英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所肥胖指南的更新
Obes Rev. 2009 Jan;10(1):110-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2008.00515.x. Epub 2008 Jul 30.
8
Process evaluation results from a school- and community-linked intervention: the Trial of Activity for Adolescent Girls (TAAG).一项学校与社区联动干预措施的过程评估结果:少女活动试验(TAAG)。
Health Educ Res. 2008 Dec;23(6):976-86. doi: 10.1093/her/cyn029. Epub 2008 Jun 16.
9
Factors influencing teachers' implementation of an innovative tobacco prevention curriculum for multiethnic youth: Project SPLASH.影响教师为多民族青少年实施创新性烟草预防课程的因素:SPLASH项目
J Sch Health. 2008 May;78(5):264-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2008.00299.x.
10
Process evaluation of a school-based intervention to increase physical activity and reduce bullying.一项基于学校的旨在增加身体活动和减少欺凌行为的干预措施的过程评估。
Health Promot Pract. 2009 Jul;10(3):394-401. doi: 10.1177/1524839907307886. Epub 2008 Mar 18.