Suppr超能文献

健康体育干预的过程评估结果。

Process evaluation results from the HEALTHY physical education intervention.

机构信息

School of Nursing.chool of Social Work, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.

出版信息

Health Educ Res. 2012 Apr;27(2):307-18. doi: 10.1093/her/cyr107. Epub 2011 Dec 8.

Abstract

Process evaluation is an assessment of the implementation of an intervention. A process evaluation component was embedded in the HEALTHY study, a primary prevention trial for Type 2 diabetes implemented over 3 years in 21 middle schools across the United States. The HEALTHY physical education (PE) intervention aimed at maximizing student engagement in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity through delivery of structured lesson plans by PE teachers. Process evaluation data collected via class observations and interventionist interviews assessed fidelity, dose delivered, implementor participation, dose received and barriers. Process evaluation results indicate a high level of fidelity in implementing HEALTHY PE activities and offering 225 min of PE every 10 school days. Concerning dose delivered, students were active for approximately 33 min of class, representing an average of 61% of the class time. Results also indicate that PE teachers were generally engaged in implementing the HEALTHY PE curriculum. Data on dose received showed that students were highly engaged with the PE intervention; however, student misbehavior was the most common barrier observed during classes. Other barriers included teacher disengagement, large classes, limited gym space and poor classroom management. Findings suggest that the PE intervention was generally implemented and received as intended despite several barriers.

摘要

过程评估是对干预措施实施情况的评估。在一项针对 2 型糖尿病的初级预防试验——HEALTHY 研究中嵌入了一个过程评估部分,该研究在美国 21 所中学进行了 3 年。HEALTHY 体育课(PE)干预旨在通过体育教师提供结构化的课程计划,最大限度地提高学生参与中等至剧烈强度身体活动的积极性。通过课堂观察和干预者访谈收集的过程评估数据评估了保真度、提供的剂量、实施者参与度、接受的剂量和障碍。过程评估结果表明,在实施 HEALTHY PE 活动和每 10 个上学日提供 225 分钟的 PE 方面具有高度的保真度。关于提供的剂量,学生在课堂上活跃约 33 分钟,占课堂时间的平均 61%。结果还表明,体育教师普遍参与实施 HEALTHY PE 课程。关于接受剂量的数据表明,学生高度参与 PE 干预;然而,学生的不良行为是课堂上观察到的最常见障碍。其他障碍包括教师不参与、班级规模大、体育馆空间有限和课堂管理不善。研究结果表明,尽管存在一些障碍,但 PE 干预通常按计划实施并得到了预期的效果。

相似文献

1
Process evaluation results from the HEALTHY physical education intervention.
Health Educ Res. 2012 Apr;27(2):307-18. doi: 10.1093/her/cyr107. Epub 2011 Dec 8.
2
Rationale, design and methods of the HEALTHY study physical education intervention component.
Int J Obes (Lond). 2009 Aug;33 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S37-43. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2009.115.
4
Effects of the CATCH physical education intervention: teacher type and lesson location.
Am J Prev Med. 2001 Aug;21(2):101-9. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(01)00335-x.
6
Rationale, design and methods for process evaluation in the HEALTHY study.
Int J Obes (Lond). 2009 Aug;33 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S60-7. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2009.118.
8
Adapting Active Science to PE Curricula: Examining Feasibility and Acceptability in Low-Income, Urban Public Schools.
Res Q Exerc Sport. 2022 Dec;93(4):741-748. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2021.1917755. Epub 2021 Oct 28.

引用本文的文献

2
Process evaluation of a pre-adolescent transdisciplinary health intervention for inter-generational outcomes.
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 23;16(12):e0261632. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261632. eCollection 2021.
3
School-based physical activity programs for promoting physical activity and fitness in children and adolescents aged 6 to 18.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 23;9(9):CD007651. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007651.pub3.
7
Implementation evaluation of a professional development program for comprehensive school physical activity leaders.
Prev Med Rep. 2020 May 5;19:101109. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101109. eCollection 2020 Sep.
8
Impact on Physical Fitness of the Chinese CHAMPS: A Clustered Randomized Controlled Trial.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 11;16(22):4412. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16224412.

本文引用的文献

1
A school-based intervention for diabetes risk reduction.
N Engl J Med. 2010 Jul 29;363(5):443-53. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1001933. Epub 2010 Jun 27.
2
Youth risk behavior surveillance - United States, 2009.
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2010 Jun 4;59(5):1-142.
3
Rationale, design and methods for process evaluation in the HEALTHY study.
Int J Obes (Lond). 2009 Aug;33 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S60-7. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2009.118.
4
Social marketing-based communications to integrate and support the HEALTHY study intervention.
Int J Obes (Lond). 2009 Aug;33 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S52-9. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2009.117.
5
Rationale, design and methods of the HEALTHY study behavior intervention component.
Int J Obes (Lond). 2009 Aug;33 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S44-51. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2009.116.
6
HEALTHY study rationale, design and methods: moderating risk of type 2 diabetes in multi-ethnic middle school students.
Int J Obes (Lond). 2009 Aug;33 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S4-20. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2009.112.
7
Rationale, design and methods of the HEALTHY study physical education intervention component.
Int J Obes (Lond). 2009 Aug;33 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S37-43. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2009.115.
8
Rationale, design and methods of the HEALTHY study nutrition intervention component.
Int J Obes (Lond). 2009 Aug;33 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S29-36. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2009.114.
9
School-based physical activity programs for promoting physical activity and fitness in children and adolescents aged 6-18.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jan 21(1):CD007651. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007651.
10
Physical activity and prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Sports Med. 2008;38(10):807-24. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200838100-00002.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验