• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

健康体育干预的过程评估结果。

Process evaluation results from the HEALTHY physical education intervention.

机构信息

School of Nursing.chool of Social Work, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.

出版信息

Health Educ Res. 2012 Apr;27(2):307-18. doi: 10.1093/her/cyr107. Epub 2011 Dec 8.

DOI:10.1093/her/cyr107
PMID:22156231
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3303206/
Abstract

Process evaluation is an assessment of the implementation of an intervention. A process evaluation component was embedded in the HEALTHY study, a primary prevention trial for Type 2 diabetes implemented over 3 years in 21 middle schools across the United States. The HEALTHY physical education (PE) intervention aimed at maximizing student engagement in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity through delivery of structured lesson plans by PE teachers. Process evaluation data collected via class observations and interventionist interviews assessed fidelity, dose delivered, implementor participation, dose received and barriers. Process evaluation results indicate a high level of fidelity in implementing HEALTHY PE activities and offering 225 min of PE every 10 school days. Concerning dose delivered, students were active for approximately 33 min of class, representing an average of 61% of the class time. Results also indicate that PE teachers were generally engaged in implementing the HEALTHY PE curriculum. Data on dose received showed that students were highly engaged with the PE intervention; however, student misbehavior was the most common barrier observed during classes. Other barriers included teacher disengagement, large classes, limited gym space and poor classroom management. Findings suggest that the PE intervention was generally implemented and received as intended despite several barriers.

摘要

过程评估是对干预措施实施情况的评估。在一项针对 2 型糖尿病的初级预防试验——HEALTHY 研究中嵌入了一个过程评估部分,该研究在美国 21 所中学进行了 3 年。HEALTHY 体育课(PE)干预旨在通过体育教师提供结构化的课程计划,最大限度地提高学生参与中等至剧烈强度身体活动的积极性。通过课堂观察和干预者访谈收集的过程评估数据评估了保真度、提供的剂量、实施者参与度、接受的剂量和障碍。过程评估结果表明,在实施 HEALTHY PE 活动和每 10 个上学日提供 225 分钟的 PE 方面具有高度的保真度。关于提供的剂量,学生在课堂上活跃约 33 分钟,占课堂时间的平均 61%。结果还表明,体育教师普遍参与实施 HEALTHY PE 课程。关于接受剂量的数据表明,学生高度参与 PE 干预;然而,学生的不良行为是课堂上观察到的最常见障碍。其他障碍包括教师不参与、班级规模大、体育馆空间有限和课堂管理不善。研究结果表明,尽管存在一些障碍,但 PE 干预通常按计划实施并得到了预期的效果。

相似文献

1
Process evaluation results from the HEALTHY physical education intervention.健康体育干预的过程评估结果。
Health Educ Res. 2012 Apr;27(2):307-18. doi: 10.1093/her/cyr107. Epub 2011 Dec 8.
2
Rationale, design and methods of the HEALTHY study physical education intervention component.“HEALTHY 研究体育干预部分的原理、设计和方法。”
Int J Obes (Lond). 2009 Aug;33 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S37-43. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2009.115.
3
Outcomes of a field trial to improve children's dietary patterns and physical activity. The Child and Adolescent Trial for Cardiovascular Health. CATCH collaborative group.一项改善儿童饮食模式和身体活动的现场试验结果。儿童和青少年心血管健康试验。CATCH协作组。
JAMA. 1996 Mar 13;275(10):768-76. doi: 10.1001/jama.1996.03530340032026.
4
Effects of the CATCH physical education intervention: teacher type and lesson location.CATCH体育教育干预的效果:教师类型和授课地点
Am J Prev Med. 2001 Aug;21(2):101-9. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(01)00335-x.
5
Physical education in secondary schools located in low-income communities: Physical activity levels, lesson context and teacher interaction.位于低收入社区的中学体育教育:身体活动水平、课程背景与教师互动
J Sci Med Sport. 2016 Feb;19(2):135-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2014.12.003. Epub 2014 Dec 12.
6
Rationale, design and methods for process evaluation in the HEALTHY study.《HEALTHY 研究中过程评估的原理、设计和方法》
Int J Obes (Lond). 2009 Aug;33 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S60-7. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2009.118.
7
A systematic review and meta-analysis of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity levels in secondary school physical education lessons.中学体育课中中等至剧烈身体活动水平的系统评价与荟萃分析。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 Apr 24;14(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0504-0.
8
Adapting Active Science to PE Curricula: Examining Feasibility and Acceptability in Low-Income, Urban Public Schools.
Res Q Exerc Sport. 2022 Dec;93(4):741-748. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2021.1917755. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
9
A non-equivalent group pilot trial of a school-based physical activity and fitness intervention for 10-11 year old english children: born to move.一项针对10至11岁英国儿童的基于学校的体育活动与健身干预的非等效组试点试验:为运动而生。
BMC Public Health. 2016 Aug 24;16(1):861. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3550-7.
10
An interventional study with the Maldives generalist teachers in primary school physical education: An application of self-determination theory.一项关于马尔代夫小学体育通才教师的干预研究:自我决定理论的应用。
PLoS One. 2022 May 6;17(5):e0268098. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268098. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Start small and let it build; a mixed-method evaluation of a school-based physical activity program, Kilometre Club.从小处着手,逐步推进;对基于学校的体育活动项目“千米俱乐部”的混合方法评估。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Jan 19;23(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14927-7.
2
Process evaluation of a pre-adolescent transdisciplinary health intervention for inter-generational outcomes.青少年前跨学科健康干预对代际结果的过程评价。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 23;16(12):e0261632. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261632. eCollection 2021.
3
School-based physical activity programs for promoting physical activity and fitness in children and adolescents aged 6 to 18.以学校为基础的身体活动计划促进 6 至 18 岁儿童和青少年身体活动和健康。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 23;9(9):CD007651. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007651.pub3.
4
Process Evaluation of FoodMASTER Middle Grades: An Integrative Approach to Nutrition Education in the Science Classroom.《FoodMASTER初中课程的过程评估:科学课堂中营养教育的综合方法》
Health Behav Policy Rev. 2017 Sep;4(5):491-502. doi: 10.14485/hbpr.4.5.9.
5
Health Literacy in Schools? A Systematic Review of Health-Related Interventions Aimed at Disadvantaged Adolescents.学校中的健康素养?针对弱势青少年的健康相关干预措施的系统评价
Children (Basel). 2021 Feb 25;8(3):176. doi: 10.3390/children8030176.
6
Reach, Recruitment, Dose, and Intervention Fidelity of the GoActive School-Based Physical Activity Intervention in the UK: A Mixed-Methods Process Evaluation.英国GoActive校内体育活动干预的覆盖范围、招募情况、剂量及干预保真度:一项混合方法过程评估
Children (Basel). 2020 Nov 17;7(11):231. doi: 10.3390/children7110231.
7
Implementation evaluation of a professional development program for comprehensive school physical activity leaders.针对综合学校体育活动领导者的专业发展计划的实施评估
Prev Med Rep. 2020 May 5;19:101109. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101109. eCollection 2020 Sep.
8
Impact on Physical Fitness of the Chinese CHAMPS: A Clustered Randomized Controlled Trial.中国 CHAMPS 对体质健康的影响:一项整群随机对照试验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 11;16(22):4412. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16224412.
9
Protocol: Improving Access to Specialist Nephrology Care Among Rural/Remote Dwellers of Alberta: The Role of Electronic Consultation in Improving Care for Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease.方案:改善艾伯塔省农村/偏远地区居民获得专科肾病护理的机会:电子会诊在改善慢性肾病患者护理中的作用。
Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2019 Sep 30;6:2054358119878715. doi: 10.1177/2054358119878715. eCollection 2019.
10
Variation in the operationalisation of dose in implementation of health promotion interventions: insights and recommendations from a scoping review.在实施健康促进干预措施时,剂量实施的变化:来自范围综述的见解和建议。
Implement Sci. 2019 Jun 6;14(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0899-x.

本文引用的文献

1
A school-based intervention for diabetes risk reduction.以学校为基础的糖尿病风险降低干预措施。
N Engl J Med. 2010 Jul 29;363(5):443-53. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1001933. Epub 2010 Jun 27.
2
Youth risk behavior surveillance - United States, 2009.青少年危险行为监测 - 美国,2009 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2010 Jun 4;59(5):1-142.
3
Rationale, design and methods for process evaluation in the HEALTHY study.《HEALTHY 研究中过程评估的原理、设计和方法》
Int J Obes (Lond). 2009 Aug;33 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S60-7. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2009.118.
4
Social marketing-based communications to integrate and support the HEALTHY study intervention.基于社会营销的传播来整合和支持 HEALTHY 研究干预。
Int J Obes (Lond). 2009 Aug;33 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S52-9. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2009.117.
5
Rationale, design and methods of the HEALTHY study behavior intervention component.HEALTHY 研究行为干预部分的原理、设计和方法。
Int J Obes (Lond). 2009 Aug;33 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S44-51. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2009.116.
6
HEALTHY study rationale, design and methods: moderating risk of type 2 diabetes in multi-ethnic middle school students.健康研究的基本原理、设计和方法:降低多民族中学生 2 型糖尿病风险。
Int J Obes (Lond). 2009 Aug;33 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S4-20. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2009.112.
7
Rationale, design and methods of the HEALTHY study physical education intervention component.“HEALTHY 研究体育干预部分的原理、设计和方法。”
Int J Obes (Lond). 2009 Aug;33 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S37-43. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2009.115.
8
Rationale, design and methods of the HEALTHY study nutrition intervention component.HEALTHY 研究营养干预部分的原理、设计和方法。
Int J Obes (Lond). 2009 Aug;33 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S29-36. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2009.114.
9
School-based physical activity programs for promoting physical activity and fitness in children and adolescents aged 6-18.以学校为基础的体育活动项目,旨在促进6至18岁儿童和青少年的体育活动及健康状况。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jan 21(1):CD007651. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007651.
10
Physical activity and prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus.体育活动与2型糖尿病的预防
Sports Med. 2008;38(10):807-24. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200838100-00002.