• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Scaling properties of European research units.欧洲研究单位的规模属性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Aug 11;106(32):13160-3. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0903190106. Epub 2009 Jul 22.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
Universities scale like cities.大学的发展规模如同城市。
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e59384. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059384. Epub 2013 Mar 27.
4
Determinants of the incidence of non-academic staff in European and US HEIs.欧美高等教育机构非教学人员发生率的决定因素。
High Educ (Dordr). 2023;85(1):55-83. doi: 10.1007/s10734-022-00819-7. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
5
Model selection for identifying power-law scaling.用于识别幂律缩放的模型选择
Neuroimage. 2016 Aug 1;136:215-26. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.01.008. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
6
Network-state modulation of power-law frequency-scaling in visual cortical neurons.网络状态对视觉皮层神经元中幂律频率标度的调制。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2009 Sep;5(9):e1000519. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000519. Epub 2009 Sep 25.
7
Geometry of river networks. I. Scaling, fluctuations, and deviations.河网的几何学。I. 尺度、波动与偏差。
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2001 Jan;63(1 Pt 2):016115. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.63.016115. Epub 2000 Dec 27.
8
Scaling range of power laws that originate from fluctuation analysis.源自波动分析的幂律的标度范围。
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2013 May;87(5):052809. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.87.052809. Epub 2013 May 23.
9
World Wide Web scaling exponent from Simon's 1955 model.
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2001 Sep;64(3 Pt 2):035104. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.64.035104. Epub 2001 Aug 27.
10
Scaling laws of human interaction activity.人类互动活动的标度律。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Aug 4;106(31):12640-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0902667106. Epub 2009 Jul 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Systematic shifts in scaling behavior based on organizational strategy in universities.基于大学组织策略的规模行为的系统转变。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 28;16(10):e0254582. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254582. eCollection 2021.
2
Size, Accumulation and Performance for Research Grants: Examining the Role of Size for Centres of Excellence.研究资助的规模、积累与绩效:审视规模对卓越中心的作用。
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 10;11(2):e0147726. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147726. eCollection 2016.
3
Urban Scaling of Cities in the Netherlands.荷兰城市的城市规模缩放
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 11;11(1):e0146775. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146775. eCollection 2016.
4
The dynamics of mergers and acquisitions: ancestry as the seminal determinant.并购的动态变化:出身作为关键决定因素。
Proc Math Phys Eng Sci. 2014 Nov 8;470(2171):20140370. doi: 10.1098/rspa.2014.0370.
5
Universities scale like cities.大学的发展规模如同城市。
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e59384. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059384. Epub 2013 Mar 27.

本文引用的文献

1
The origin of allometric scaling laws in biology from genomes to ecosystems: towards a quantitative unifying theory of biological structure and organization.生物学中从基因组到生态系统的异速生长比例定律的起源:迈向生物结构与组织的定量统一理论。
J Exp Biol. 2005 May;208(Pt 9):1575-92. doi: 10.1242/jeb.01589.
2
Hierarchy measures in complex networks.复杂网络中的层次度量
Phys Rev Lett. 2004 Apr 30;92(17):178702. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.178702. Epub 2004 Apr 29.
3
Self-similar community structure in a network of human interactions.人类互动网络中的自相似社区结构。
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2003 Dec;68(6 Pt 2):065103. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.68.065103. Epub 2003 Dec 17.
4
Scaling laws in the functional content of genomes.基因组功能内容中的标度律。
Trends Genet. 2003 Sep;19(9):479-84. doi: 10.1016/S0168-9525(03)00203-8.
5
Specificity and stability in topology of protein networks.蛋白质网络拓扑结构的特异性与稳定性。
Science. 2002 May 3;296(5569):910-3. doi: 10.1126/science.1065103.
6
Size and form in efficient transportation networks.高效交通网络中的规模与形态。
Nature. 1999 May 13;399(6732):130-2. doi: 10.1038/20144.
7
A general model for the origin of allometric scaling laws in biology.生物学中异速生长比例定律起源的通用模型。
Science. 1997 Apr 4;276(5309):122-6. doi: 10.1126/science.276.5309.122.

欧洲研究单位的规模属性。

Scaling properties of European research units.

作者信息

Jamtveit Bjørn, Jettestuen Espen, Mathiesen Joachim

机构信息

Physics of Geological Processes, University of Oslo, PO Box 1048 Blindern, N-0316 Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Aug 11;106(32):13160-3. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0903190106. Epub 2009 Jul 22.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.0903190106
PMID:19625626
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2714277/
Abstract

A quantitative characterization of the scale-dependent features of research units may provide important insight into how such units are organized and how they grow. The relative importance of top-down versus bottom-up controls on their growth may be revealed by their scaling properties. Here we show that the number of support staff in Scandinavian research units, ranging in size from 20 to 7,800 staff members, is related to the number of academic staff by a power law. The scaling exponent of approximately 1.30 is broadly consistent with a simple hierarchical model of the university organization. Similar scaling behavior between small and large research units with a wide range of ambitions and strategies argues against top-down control of the growth. Top-down effects, and externally imposed effects from changing political environments, can be observed as fluctuations around the main trend. The observed scaling law implies that cost-benefit arguments for merging research institutions into larger and larger units may have limited validity unless the productivity per academic staff and/or the quality of the products are considerably higher in larger institutions. Despite the hierarchical structure of most large-scale research units in Europe, the network structures represented by the academic component of such units are strongly antihierarchical and suboptimal for efficient communication within individual units.

摘要

对研究单位规模相关特征进行定量描述,可能会为这些单位的组织方式及其发展方式提供重要见解。自上而下与自下而上的控制对其发展的相对重要性,可能会通过它们的标度性质得以揭示。在此我们表明,斯堪的纳维亚研究单位中辅助人员的数量(规模从20名到7800名工作人员不等)与学术人员数量遵循幂律关系。约为1.30的标度指数与大学组织的一个简单层级模型大致相符。不同规模、有着广泛目标和策略的大小研究单位之间类似的标度行为,反驳了自上而下的发展控制观点。自上而下的影响以及政治环境变化带来的外部影响,可以视作围绕主要趋势的波动。观察到的标度定律意味着,将研究机构合并为越来越大的单位的成本效益论据可能有效性有限,除非大型机构中学术人员的生产率和/或产品质量显著更高。尽管欧洲大多数大规模研究单位具有层级结构,但这些单位学术部分所代表的网络结构强烈反层级,并且对于单个单位内的高效沟通而言并非最优。