Jamtveit Bjørn, Jettestuen Espen, Mathiesen Joachim
Physics of Geological Processes, University of Oslo, PO Box 1048 Blindern, N-0316 Oslo, Norway.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Aug 11;106(32):13160-3. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0903190106. Epub 2009 Jul 22.
A quantitative characterization of the scale-dependent features of research units may provide important insight into how such units are organized and how they grow. The relative importance of top-down versus bottom-up controls on their growth may be revealed by their scaling properties. Here we show that the number of support staff in Scandinavian research units, ranging in size from 20 to 7,800 staff members, is related to the number of academic staff by a power law. The scaling exponent of approximately 1.30 is broadly consistent with a simple hierarchical model of the university organization. Similar scaling behavior between small and large research units with a wide range of ambitions and strategies argues against top-down control of the growth. Top-down effects, and externally imposed effects from changing political environments, can be observed as fluctuations around the main trend. The observed scaling law implies that cost-benefit arguments for merging research institutions into larger and larger units may have limited validity unless the productivity per academic staff and/or the quality of the products are considerably higher in larger institutions. Despite the hierarchical structure of most large-scale research units in Europe, the network structures represented by the academic component of such units are strongly antihierarchical and suboptimal for efficient communication within individual units.
对研究单位规模相关特征进行定量描述,可能会为这些单位的组织方式及其发展方式提供重要见解。自上而下与自下而上的控制对其发展的相对重要性,可能会通过它们的标度性质得以揭示。在此我们表明,斯堪的纳维亚研究单位中辅助人员的数量(规模从20名到7800名工作人员不等)与学术人员数量遵循幂律关系。约为1.30的标度指数与大学组织的一个简单层级模型大致相符。不同规模、有着广泛目标和策略的大小研究单位之间类似的标度行为,反驳了自上而下的发展控制观点。自上而下的影响以及政治环境变化带来的外部影响,可以视作围绕主要趋势的波动。观察到的标度定律意味着,将研究机构合并为越来越大的单位的成本效益论据可能有效性有限,除非大型机构中学术人员的生产率和/或产品质量显著更高。尽管欧洲大多数大规模研究单位具有层级结构,但这些单位学术部分所代表的网络结构强烈反层级,并且对于单个单位内的高效沟通而言并非最优。