• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用多重迷你面试法评估兽医课程申请者。

Assessment of applicants to the veterinary curriculum using a multiple mini-interview method.

作者信息

Hecker Kent, Donnon Tyrone, Fuentealba Carmen, Hall David, Illanes Oscar, Morck Doug W, Muelling Christoph

机构信息

Department of Veterinary Clinical and Diagnostic Science, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.

出版信息

J Vet Med Educ. 2009 Summer;36(2):166-73. doi: 10.3138/jvme.36.2.166.

DOI:10.3138/jvme.36.2.166
PMID:19625664
Abstract

This study describes the development, implementation, and psychometric assessment of the multiple mini-interview (MMI) for the inaugural class of veterinary medicine applicants at the University of Calgary Faculty of Veterinary Medicine (UCVM). The MMI is a series of approximately five to 12 10-minute interviews that consist of situational events. Applicants are given a scenario and asked to work through an issue or behavioral-type questions that are meant to assess one attribute (e.g., empathy) at a time. This structure allows for multiple assessments of the applicants by trained interviewers on the same questions. MMI scenario development was based on a review of the noncognitive attributes currently assessed by the 31 veterinary schools across Canada and the United States and the goals and objectives of UCVM. The noncognitive attributes of applicants (N=110) were assessed at five stations, by two interviewers within each station, on three items using a standardized rating form on an anchored 1-5 scale. The method was determined to be reliable (G-coefficient=0.88) and demonstrated evidence of validity. The MMI score did not correlate with grade-point average (r=0.12, p=0.22). While neither the applicants nor interviewers had participated in an MMI format before, both groups reported the process to be acceptable in a post-interview questionnaire. This analysis provides preliminary evidence of the reliability, validity, and acceptability of the MMI in assessing the noncognitive attributes of applicants for veterinary medical school admissions.

摘要

本研究描述了针对卡尔加里大学兽医学院(UCVM)首届兽医学申请者的多重迷你面试(MMI)的开发、实施和心理测量评估。MMI是一系列约五到十二个10分钟的面试,由情景事件组成。会给申请者一个情景,并要求他们解决一个问题或回答行为类型的问题,每次旨在评估一个属性(如同理心)。这种结构允许经过培训的面试官就相同问题对申请者进行多次评估。MMI情景的开发基于对加拿大和美国31所兽医学院目前评估的非认知属性以及UCVM的目标和宗旨的审查。使用1-5分的标准评分表,在五个站点由每个站点的两名面试官对1百10名申请者的非认知属性在三个项目上进行评估。该方法被确定为可靠的(G系数 = 0.88),并证明了有效性。MMI分数与平均绩点不相关(r = 0.12,p = 0.22)。虽然申请者和面试官之前都没有参与过MMI形式,但两组在面试后的问卷中都表示该过程是可以接受的。该分析为MMI在评估兽医学院入学申请者的非认知属性方面的可靠性、有效性和可接受性提供了初步证据。

相似文献

1
Assessment of applicants to the veterinary curriculum using a multiple mini-interview method.使用多重迷你面试法评估兽医课程申请者。
J Vet Med Educ. 2009 Summer;36(2):166-73. doi: 10.3138/jvme.36.2.166.
2
A generalizability analysis of a veterinary school Multiple Mini Interview: effect of number of interviewers, type of interviewers, and number of stations.对兽医学校多站式面试的可推广性分析:面试官人数、面试官类型和站点数量的影响。
Teach Learn Med. 2011 Oct;23(4):331-6. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2011.611769.
3
Assessment of non-cognitive traits through the admissions multiple mini-interview.通过入学多重迷你面试评估非认知特质。
Med Educ. 2007 Jun;41(6):573-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02767.x.
4
The acceptability of the multiple mini interview for resident selection.用于住院医师选拔的多重迷你面试的可接受性。
Fam Med. 2008 Nov-Dec;40(10):734-40.
5
Using standardized essays in the veterinary medicine admissions process: are the ratings reliable and valid?在兽医学入学过程中使用标准化短文:评分是否可靠且有效?
J Vet Med Educ. 2010 Fall;37(3):254-7. doi: 10.3138/jvme.37.3.254.
6
Multiple mini-interviews versus traditional interviews: stakeholder acceptability comparison.多轮迷你面试与传统面试:利益相关者可接受性比较。
Med Educ. 2009 Oct;43(10):993-1000. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03447.x.
7
The multiple mini-interview for selection of international medical graduates into family medicine residency education.国际医学毕业生选择家庭医学住院医师教育的多站迷你面试。
Med Educ. 2009 Jun;43(6):573-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03380.x.
8
Introduction of the multiple mini interview into the admissions process at the University of Calgary: acceptability and feasibility.将多重迷你面试引入卡尔加里大学招生流程:可接受性与可行性
Med Teach. 2007 May;29(4):394-6. doi: 10.1080/01421590701311713.
9
Enhancing the reliability of the multiple mini-interview for selecting prospective health care leaders.提高多站式面试在选拔未来医疗保健领导者中的可靠性。
Acad Med. 2011 Aug;86(8):1032-9. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182223ab7.
10
The multiple mini-interview: how long is long enough?多重迷你面试:多长时间才算足够?
Med Educ. 2009 Feb;43(2):168-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03260.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Investigating the internal structure of multiple mini interviews-A perspective from Pakistan.探究多站式面试的内部结构——来自巴基斯坦的视角。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 11;19(4):e0301365. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301365. eCollection 2024.
2
Employing Multiple Mini Interviews in Selection Processes for Psychology Professional Training Programs: Ten Tips for Effective Implementation.在心理学专业培训项目选拔过程中采用多次小型面试:有效实施的十点建议。
MedEdPublish (2016). 2020 Sep 14;9:192. doi: 10.15694/mep.2020.000192.1. eCollection 2020.
3
Multiple Mini-Interviews: Current Perspectives on Utility and Limitations.
多次小型访谈:关于效用与局限性的当前观点
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2019 Dec 12;10:1031-1038. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S181332. eCollection 2019.
4
Is a veterinary student's performance on multiple-mini interviews affected by personality preferences?兽医专业学生在多重迷你面试中的表现会受到性格偏好的影响吗?
Int J Med Educ. 2019 Jan 25;10:16-22. doi: 10.5116/ijme.5c39.c815.
5
Multiple mini interviews: revealing similarities across institutions.多站面试:揭示不同机构之间的相似之处。
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Aug 6;18(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1298-8.
6
The effect of personality traits on undergraduate dental students' performance in multiple mini interviews.人格特质对本科牙科学生在多对一迷你面试中表现的影响。
Electron Physician. 2017 May 25;9(5):4322-4329. doi: 10.19082/4322. eCollection 2017 May.
7
Perceptions and Cost-Analysis of a Multiple Mini-Interview in a Pharmacy School Admissions Process.药学院招生过程中多重迷你面试的认知与成本分析。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2015 Nov 25;79(9):135. doi: 10.5688/ajpe799135.
8
Academic entitlement in pharmacy education.药学教育中的学术权利。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2012 Dec 12;76(10):189. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7610189.
9
What should we be selecting for? A systematic approach for determining which personal characteristics to assess for during admissions.我们应该选择什么?一种系统的方法,用于确定在入院期间评估哪些个人特征。
BMC Med Educ. 2012 Nov 5;12:105. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-12-105.