Kloda Lorie Andrea, Bartlett Joan C
School of Information Studies, McGill University, McLennan Library Building, 3459 McTavish Street, Montreal, QC H3A 1Y1, Canada.
J Med Libr Assoc. 2009 Jul;97(3):194-202. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.97.3.008.
The review sought to synthesize existing research relevant to rehabilitation therapists' clinical information behavior and to identify gaps in evidence, particularly in comparison to what is already known about the information behavior of other health professionals, such as physicians.
A literature review was conducted of both quantitative and qualitative research studies that included information on the clinical information behavior of occupational therapists, physical therapists, and speech-language pathologists. Findings were organized according to a taxonomy of variables derived from the literature.
Findings from seventeen studies, mostly surveys, conducted since 1990 demonstrate that very little is known about the clinical information needs of and information use by rehabilitation therapists. The sources most often consulted by rehabilitation therapists are printed materials (books and journals) and colleagues. Databases are consulted less often, and few rehabilitation therapists are aware of databases other than MEDLINE.
Methodological flaws limit the generalizability and validity of much of the research conducted on the clinical information behavior of this population. More research is needed to better understand the clinical questions that arise in rehabilitation therapists' practice, reasons for consulting certain sources, and ways in which information seeking enhances evidence-based practice.
本综述旨在综合与康复治疗师临床信息行为相关的现有研究,并找出证据方面的差距,特别是与已了解的其他卫生专业人员(如医生)的信息行为相比。
对定量和定性研究进行文献综述,这些研究包含职业治疗师、物理治疗师和言语治疗师临床信息行为的相关信息。研究结果根据从文献中得出的变量分类法进行整理。
自1990年以来进行的17项研究(大多为调查)结果表明,我们对康复治疗师的临床信息需求和信息使用情况了解甚少。康复治疗师最常查阅的信息来源是印刷材料(书籍和期刊)以及同事。较少查阅数据库,而且很少有康复治疗师知晓除MEDLINE之外的其他数据库。
方法上的缺陷限制了针对该人群临床信息行为所开展的大部分研究的普遍性和有效性。需要开展更多研究,以更好地理解康复治疗师实践中出现的临床问题、查阅特定信息来源的原因,以及信息检索促进循证实践的方式。